• 동의신경정신과학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.81-93
• /
• 2021

Objectives: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is condition of cognitive decline shown in transition from normal aging to dementia. Hominis placenta pharmacopuncture (HPP) is a treatment that combines effects of medication and acupuncture by injecting Hominis placenta into acupoints. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HPP for MCI. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-center clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to either the HPP group or the placebo group. HPP or saline as placebo was administered to participants for eight weeks. Changes in symptoms were observed. The primary outcome was difference in mean change of Korean Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-K) score between the HPP group and the placebo group. Cognitive function, overall status of mood and sleep, and quality of life (QoL) were also assessed. Safety assessment and economic analysis were then conducted. Results: Thirty participants were enrolled. One participant in the placebo group dropped out. The score of MoCA-K increased after treatment. Its mean change was smaller in the HPP group than in the control group. HPP ameliorated Global Deterioration Scale and Korean Dementia Rating Scale subtests for attention, organization, and memory compared to the placebo. However, none of them was significantly different between the two groups. Mood, sleep, and QoL all improved more in the HPP group than in the placebo group, although differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. There was no adverse event probably related to the drug. HPP treatment needed KRW 345,000 more than the placebo group in improving Geriatric Quality of Life scale-Dementia score by one point for one year. Conclusions: Although HPP treatment did not significantly improve cognition, it changed behavioral and psychological symptoms in MCI.

• Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.279-285
• /
• 2005

목적 : 이 연구에서는 장시간 약물작용이 지속되는 MPH-OROS를 주의력결핍과잉운동장애 아동에게 투여하여 그 효용성과 안전성 및 부모 만족도를 평가하려고 하였다. 방법 : 연구대상은 DSM-IV의 진단기준을 이용하여 임상적으로 ADHD로 진단 받은 569명의 아동으로 하였다. 이미 약물을 복용중이거나 약을 복용한 적이 없는 아동을 대상으로 이전 약물에서 MPH-OROS로 약물을 바꾸거나 처음으로 MPH-OROS를 복용하였다. 증상의 정도는 MPH-OROS 약물 사용 전과 사용 1주 및 3주에 한국어판 Conners 부모용 평가척도를 사용하여 평가하였다. 임상 호전은 Clinical Global Impression Severity of illness(CGI-S)를 사용하여 MPH-OROS 약물 복용 전과 복용 1주 및 3주에 임상가가 평가하였고 Clinical global impression severity of improvement(CGI-I)로 약물 복용 1주 및 3주에 호전 정도를 평가하였다. 약물 복용 3주에는 약물 복용에 따른 부모 만족도를 설문 조사하였다. 결과 : MPH-OROS의 1일 평균 복용량은 기저선 $25.3{\pm}11.2mg$ 1주 $28.9{\pm}12.7mg$, 3주 $31.3{\pm}13.2mg$이었다. 시간에 따라 용량이 유의하게 증가하였고, 성에 따른 차이는 없었다. 전체의 $13\%$가 중도 탈락했으며, 그 원인으로는 부작용이 가장 많았다. CGI-I의 변화는 시간에 따라 유의하게 감소하는 모습을 보였고, 성에 따른 호전 정도의 차이는 나타나지 않았다. CGI-I에 의한 호전평가에서 MPH-OROS 치료 1주에 호전은 $72.3\%$이고 치료 3주에는 $87.4\%$였다. 한국판 Conners부모용 평가척도 합계 점수는 시간에 따라 유의하게 감소하였다. 한 가지 이상의 부작용을 경험하였던 환자는 119명으로 $20.7\%$에 달하였으며, 가장 많은 빈도로 나타난 것은 식욕부진이고, 불면, 두통, 오심의 순이었다. 기존에 속효성 메틸페니데이트를 사용하던 군과 약물을 처음 사용하는 군을 나누어 부작용 빈도를 살펴보았을 때 크게 차이가 나지 않았다. 부모만족도 설문 결과에서 MPH-OROS 약물치료에 대해 $94\%$의 부모는 전반적으로 만족한다고 응답하였다. 또한 부모가 보고하는 MPH-OROS 의 가장 큰 장점은 오후까지 약물효과 지속, 학교생활 및 수업태도, 가정생활 및 숙제, 과잉행동 개선의 순이었다. 결론 : MPH-OROS는 주의력결핍과잉운동장애의 치료에서 효과적이며 충분히 안전하다.

• 대한한방내과학회지
• /
• 제43권6호
• /
• pp.1105-1121
• /
• 2022

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of frequently used clinical herbal medicines (Yijung-tang [Lizhong-tang, LJT], Pyeongwi-san [Pingwei-san, PWS], and Shihosogan-tang [Chaihu Shugan-tang, SST]) in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) when administered according to herbal medicine and Korean medicine pattern identification. The results of this study will be used to standardize the diagnostic instrument used in Korean medicine and to investigate biomarkers of Korean medicine pattern identification. Methods: This study will be a randomized, assessor-blind, 3-arm, parallel, open-label, multi-center clinical trial. A total of 300 FD participants will be recruited from 3 Korean medical hospitals and assigned to the LJT (n=100), PWS (n=100), and SST (n=100) groups according to FD pattern identification. The patients will take the medication for 8 weeks, 3 times a day, before or between meals. The primary outcome will be total dyspepsia symptom (TDS) and the secondary outcomes will be adequate relief (AR) for dyspepsia, overall treatment effect (OTE), visual analogue scale (VAS), functional dyspepsia-related quality of life (FD-QoL), gastrointestinal symptom score (GIS), and pattern identification questionnaires. For the exploratory outcomes, we will analyze blood and fecal metabolome profiles, microbiota from fecal and saliva samples, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and results of Korean medicine diagnosis device measurements (heart rate variability, and tongue, pulse, and abdominal diagnosis). Conclusions: The results of this study will prove objectivity for Korean medicine pattern identifications, and the effectiveness and safety of herbal medicines for the population with FD.