• Title/Summary/Keyword: Motion VAE

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

An Auto Obstacle Collision Avoidance System using Reinforcement Learning and Motion VAE (강화학습과 Motion VAE 를 이용한 자동 장애물 충돌 회피 시스템 구현)

  • Zheng Si;Taehong Gu;Taesoo Kwon
    • Journal of the Korea Computer Graphics Society
    • /
    • v.30 no.4
    • /
    • pp.1-10
    • /
    • 2024
  • In the fields of computer animation and robotics, reaching a destination while avoiding obstacles has always been a difficult task. Moreover, generating appropriate motions while planning a route is even more challenging. Recently, academic circles are actively conducting research to generate character motions by modifying and utilizing VAE (Variational Auto-Encoder), a data-based generation model. Based on this, in this study, the latent space of the MVAE model is learned using a reinforcement learning method[1]. With the policy learned in this way, the character can arrive its destination while avoiding both static and dynamic obstacles with natural motions. The character can easily avoid obstacles moving in random directions, and it is experimentally shown that the performance is improved, and the learning time is greatly reduced compared to existing approach.

The effects of functional movement recovery of physical therapy after ACL reconstruction with MCL injury (물리치료가 슬관절 내측측부인대 손상을 동반한 전방십자인대 재건술 후 운동기능 회복에 미치는 영향)

  • Kim, In-Sup;Lim, Weon-Sik;Vae, Sung-Soo
    • The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
    • /
    • v.14 no.1
    • /
    • pp.27-37
    • /
    • 2002
  • This is the study of the knee joint injured patients at the orthopaedic surgery clinic where is located in Daejon, who has MCL combine injured ACL reconstruction caused by sport activity and accident during the period from Jan. 2001 to Oct. 2001. By comparing with groups between 7th case of I-group for MCL combined stitch and II-group for ACL reconstruction since 6weeks cast. We have been concluded with that following results. 1. Range of motion for the knee was not limited at 5th case(37%) of I-group, 6th case(42%) of II-group and the cases of Flexion deficit less then 10 -degree were 2nd case(13%) of I-group and II-group 1st case(8%) with no extension deficit more then 5 -degree. 2. The level of activity that tells you whether you are capable of exercise for six month after operation. It han been divided by 3 levels. The case of capable of doing low risk exercise(swimming, cycling, etc.) was 5th case of I-group, the case of capable of doing medium risk exercise(jogging, etc.) was 3rd case of I-group and 4th case of II-group and the case of capable of doing high risk exercise(football, etc.) were 3rd case of I-group and 3rd case of II-group. 3. The timing of the return to their job were average 6.4 weeks for I-group and average 22.9 weeks for II-group(P<.05, statistical difference). 4. There was no statistical difference between I-group and II-group for the timing of the return to their job(P>.05). 5. By using VAS to compare them there was no statistical difference between I-group and II-group of clinical results according to Lysholm scale.

  • PDF