• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.353-364
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to compare and to evaluate the combination use of 5 kinds of dentin adhesive systems and 5 kinds of composite resins using micro-shear bond test. Five adhesive systems (Prime & Bond NT (PBN). Onecoat bond (OC), Excite (EX), Syntac (SY), Clearfil SE bond (CS)) and five composite resins (Spectrum (SP), Synergy Compact (SC), Tetric Ceram (TC), Clearfil AP-X (CA), Z100 (Z1)) were used for this study ($5{\;}{\times}{\;}5{\;}={\;}25group$, n =14/group). The slices of horizontally sectioned human tooth were bonded with each bonding system and each composite resin, and tested by a micro-shear bond strength test. These results were analyzed statistically. The mean micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems were in order of CS (22.642 MPa), SY (18.368 MPa), EX (14.599 MPa). OC (13.702 MPa). PBN (12.762 MPa). The mean bond strength of self-etching primer system group (CS, SY) in dentin was higher than that of self-priming adhesive system groups (PBN, EX, OC) significantly (P<0.05). The mean bond strength of composite resins was in order of SP (19.008 MPa), CA (17.532 MPa). SC (15.787 MPa), TC (15.068 MPa). Z1 (14.678 MPa). Micro-shear bond strength of SP was stronger than those of other composite resins significantly (P < 0.05). And those of TC and Z1 were weaker than other composite resins significantly (P < 0.05). No difference was found in micro-shear bond strength of composite resin in self-etching primer adhesive system groups (CS, SY) statistically. However, there was significant difference of micro-shear bond strength of composite resin groups in self-priming adhesive systems group (PBN, EX, OC). The combination of composite resin and dentin adhesive system recommended by manufacturer did not represent positive correlation. It didn't seem to be a significant factor.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제42권6호
• /
• pp.654-663
• /
• 2004

Statement of problem. According to the fracture pattern in several reports, fractures most frequently occur in the interface between the ceromer and the substructure. Purpose. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the macro shear bond strength and microshear bond strength of a ceromer bonded to a fiber reinforced composite (FRC) as well as metal alloys. Material and methods. Ten of the following substructures, type II gold alloy, Co-Cr alloy, Ni-Cr alloy, and FRC (Vectris) substructures with a 12 mm in diameter, were imbedded in acrylic resin and ground with 400, and 1, 000-grit sandpaper. The metal primer and wetting agent were applied to the sandblasted bonding area of the metal specimens and the FRC specimens, respectively. The ceromer was placed onto a 6 mm diameter and 3 mm height mold in the macro-shear test and 1 mm diameter and 2 mm height mold in the micro-shear test, and then polymerized. The macro- and micro-shear bond strength were measured using a universal testing machine and a micro-shear tester, respectively. The macro- and micro-shear strength were analyzed with ANOVA and a post-hoc Scheffe adjustment ($\alpha$ = .05). The fracture surfaces of the crowns were then examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the mode of failure. Chi-square test was used to identify the differences in the failure mode. Results. The macro-shear strength and the micro-shear strength differed significantly with the types of substructure (P<.001). Although the ceromer/FRC group showed the highest macroand micro-shear strength, the micro-shear strength was not significantly different from that of the base metal alloy groups. The base metal alloy substructure groups showed the lowest mean macro-shear strength. However, the gold alloy substructure group exhibited the least micro-shear strength. The micro-shear strength was higher than the macro-shear strength excluding the gold alloy substructure group. Adhesive failure was most frequent type of fracture in the ceromer specimens bonded to the gold alloys. Cohesive failure at the ceromer layer was more common in the base metals and FRC substructures. Conclusion. The Vectris substructure had higher shear strength than the other substructures. Although the shear strength of the ceromer bonded to the base metals was lower than that of the gold alloy, the micro-shear strength of the base metals were superior to that of the gold alloy.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.401-412
• /
• 1998

The aim of this study was to measure the regional micro-shear bond strength of dentin bonding agents to dentin, and to investigate the relationship between the micro-shear bond strength and two dentinal characteristics ; Vickers hardness and remaining dentin thickness. Twenty-four freshly extracted, noncarious human molars were selected for this study. The materials tested in this study consisted of two commercially available dentin bonding agents (MAC-BOND, ONE-STEP) and two restorative light-cured composite resins (AELITEFIL, Z100). The occlusal or side surface of tooth crown was sectioned to expose dentin, and the exposed surface was finally polished with # 600 sandpaper. Four groups of application methods were used combining the filling materials and the dentin bonding agents. The composite resin-attached tooth specimens were embeded in a cold cure acrylic resin, and were cut with a low speed diamond saw to the dimension of 1mm $\times$ 1mm. Nine specimens were obtained from each tooth. The cut specimens were divided into three groups depending on the position of the dentin bonding surface. The micro-shear bond strength, remaining dentin thickness, and dentinal hardness were measured. Experimental results were then statistically analyzed with ANOVA. t-test, Scheffe test, and regression analysis. From this experiment, the following results were obtained : 1. In the case of occlusal surface bonding, the pooled micro-shear bond strength of ONST-AELIT group (16.62 MPa) was significantly higher than that of MACB-AELIT group (9.91 MPa) (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the micro-shear bond strength depending on the dentin position (p>0.05). 2. In the case of side surface bonding of crown, the pooled micro-shear bond strength of four different bonding groups was not significantly different among each other (p>0.05). However, in three of the test groups (ONST-AELIT, MACB-Z100, ONST-Z100), the micro-shear bond strength to the lower 1/3(III) position was significantly lower than that to middle 1/3(II) position of surface (p<0.05). 3. In the ONST-AELIT bonding group, the pooled micro-shear bond strength to the occlusal surface was significantly lower than that to the side surface of crown (p<0.05). 4. There was no significant correlation between the micro-shear bond strength and dentin hardness / remaining dentin thickness (p>0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.45.1-45.11
• /
• 2018

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate fluoride release and the micro-shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP)-remineralized caries-affected dentin (CAD). Materials and Methods: Exposed dentin surfaces of 30 human third molar teeth were divided into 2 equal groups for evaluating fluoride release and the micro-shear bond strength of RMGIC to CAD. Each group was subdivided into 3 equal subgroups: 1) control (sound dentin); 2) artificially demineralized dentin (CAD); 3) CPP-ACP remineralized dentin (remineralized CAD). To measure fluoride release, 15 disc-shaped specimens of RMGIC (4 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) were bonded on one flat surface of the dentin discs of each group. Fluoride release was tested using ion chromatography at different intervals; 24 hours, 3, 5, 7 days. RMGIC micro-cylinders were built on the flat dentin surface of the 15 discs, which were prepared according to the assigned group. Micro-shear bond strength was measured after 24 hours water storage. Data were analyzed using 1- and 2-way analysis of variance and the post hoc least significant difference test (${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: Fluoride detected in solutions (at all intervals) and the micro-shear bond strength of RMGIC bonded to CPP-ACP-remineralized dentin were significantly higher than those bonded to artificial CAD (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Demineralized CAD consumes more fluoride released from RMGIC into the solution for remineralization than CPP-ACP mineralized dentin does. CPP-ACP increases the micro-shear bond strength of RMGIC to CAD.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.339-345
• /
• 2004

The aim of this study was to measure and compare the micro shear bond strengths of the following dentin bonding systems to the dentin surfaces under simulated pulpal pressure: All Bond $2^{\circledR},{\;}Second^{\circledR},{\;}AdheSE^{\circledR}$, Adper Prompt $L-Pop^{\circledR}$. The occlusal surfaces of 180 extracted human molars were prepared so the dentin bonding surfaces could be exposed. The teeth were randomly assigned to 3 equal groups of 60 each and subdivided. The dentin surfaces were treated with the above mentioned bonding system and resin composite cylinders were built up under a simulated pulpal pressure when saline (Group II) or diluted bovine serum (Group III) was used as the pulpal fluid. As a control. the same procedures were performed in the dried dentin surfaces (Group I). After one day of storage in water. the micro shear bond strengths were measured using an EZ tester. Group II and III showed significantly lower shear bond strength than Group I statistically (p < 0.05). $SEbond^{\circledR}{\;}and{\;}AdheSE^{\circledR}$ showed no difference among the different dentin condition. In the Adper Prompt $L-Pop^{\circledR}$. a simulated pulpal pressure were applied to the specimens using diluted bovine serum. which showed a higher strength than the specimens in which saline was used (p < 0.05).

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제33권5호
• /
• pp.359-370
• /
• 2003

본 연구는 교정용 금속 브라켓에 다양한 방향에서의 복합적인 응력을 가하여 힘의 방향과 적용점에 따른 교정용 브라켓의 결합강도를 비교하고, 브라켓의 유지력을 평가하는데 기준이 되는 최소결합강도의 특성에 대해 알아보고자 시행되었다. 일정 한 표면특성을 갖는 금속봉에 Micro-Loc base, Chessboard base, Non-etched Foil-Mesh base 등 서로 다른 기저 면 형태를 가지는 3가지 종류의 금속 브라켓을 부착시키고, $0^{\circ},\;15^{\circ},\;30^{\circ},\;45^{\circ},\;60^{\circ},\;75^{\circ},\;90^{\circ}$의 Peel 결합강도$(_0PBS, \;_{15}PBS,\;_{30}PBS,\;_{45}PBS,\;_{60}PBS,\;_{75}PBS,\;_{90}PBS)$ 및 전단결합강도(SBS)와 인장결합강도(TBS)에 대한 브라켓의 결합강도를 측정하고, 각 브라켓의 기저면 면적을 고려하여 단위면적당 결합강도를 산출하여 비교한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. Micro-Loc base와 Chessboard base 및 Non-etched Foil-Mesh base 브라켓 모두에서 전단결합강도(SBS)가 가장 컸다(P<0.01). 2. Peel 응력의 방향 변화에 따른 peel 결합강도(PBS)의 변화양상은 Micro-Loc base와 Chessboard base, Non-etched Foil-Mesh base 브라켓 모두에서 유사하였으며 (p>0.05), peel 응력의 적용 각이 증가할수록 peel 결합강도(PBS)는 감소하였고 $60^{\circ}$에서 최저값을 보였다(p<0.05). 3. Micro-Loc base에서 최저 peel 결합강도$(_{60}PBS)$는 전단결합강도(SBS)의 $29\%$ 수준이었으며, 인장결합강토(TBS)에 대해서는 $52\%$ 수준이었고, Chessboard base에서 최저 Peel bond strength$(_{60}PBS)$는 전단결합강도(SBS)의 $34\%$ 수준이었으며, 인장결합강도(TBS)에 대해서는 $61\%$ 수준이었으며, Non-etched Foil-Mesh base에서 최저 Peel 결합 강도$(_{60}PBS)$는 전단결합강도(SBS)의 $34\%$ 수준이었으며, 인장결합강도(TBS)에 대해서는 $55\%$ 수준이었다. 4. 단위 면적 당 결합강도에 있어서 전단결합강도(SBS)와 인장결합강도(TBS) 및 $75^{\circ}\;와\;90^{\circ}$ peel 결합강도는 Micro-Loc base와 Chessboard base에서 차이 가 없었으며 Non-etched Foil-Mesh base에서 가장 작았고(p<0.05), $0^{\circ},\;15^{\circ},\;30^{\circ},\;60^{\circ}$ peel응력을 적용한 결과 Chessboard base에서 가장 큰 Peel결합강도를, Non-etched Foil-Mesh base에서 가장 작은 결합강도를 보였다(p<0.05).

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.641-657
• /
• 1998

본 연구는 열을 이용한 금속 브라켓의 재생 처리시, 기저부 형태와 브라켓 재생 방법에 따른 전단접착강도 및 브라켓 탈락 양상을 비교하고자 시행되었다. 교정 치료를 위해 발거된 건전한 소구치 252개를 수집하고, Type I, Type II, Type III 스탠다드 브라켓을 각각 재생 방법에 따라 네 군으로 나누어 준비된 소구치에 접착하고, Instron Universal Testing Machine(Model 4466)으로 전단접착강도를 측정하였으며, 브라켓의 탈락 양상을 관찰하고 브라켓 기저부의 주사전자현미경 소견을 관찰하였다. SPSS 통계처 리 프로그램을 이용하여 일원분산분석(oneway ANOVA), Scheffe's multiple range test를 실시하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 브라켓 기저부 형태에 따른 전단접착강도는 유의차가 있었으며(p<0.001), 그 크기는 Type III(round indentation, micro-etched base), Typ I(foil-mesh base), Type II(grooved integral base, micro-etched)의 순이었다. 2. 생 방법에 따른 전단접착강도는, Type I, Tpe II 브라켓에서는 Big Jane에 1분간 처리시 우수한 결과를 보였고 (p<0.05), Type III 브라켓에서는 각 군간 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p>0.05). 3. Type I, Type II 브라켓은 기저부-레진 계면에서 가장 높은 빈도로 탈락하였고, Type III 브라켓에서는 레진의 절반 가량이 치면에 잔존하는 탈락 양상이 가장 많았다. 4. 탈락 양상에 따라 탈락시의 전단접착강도가 유의성 있는 차이를 보였는데(p<0.05),브라켓 탈락시 접착제의 절반 가량이 치면에 잔존하는 경우 전단접착강도가 가장 큰 것으로 나타났다. 5. 브라켓 재생 후 기저부에 남아 있는 접착제는 전단접착강도의 감소에 영향을 미치지 않았다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.283-293
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 합착 술식에 따른 레진 합착제의 상아질에 대한 미세전단결합강도를 비교 연구하여 이중 접착 술식의 유용성을 평가하고자 시행되었다. 합착 술식은 전통 합착 술식과 이중 접착 술식, 임시 합착제는 Propac과 Freegenol, 상아질 접착제는 All-Bond 2, One-Step, Clearfil SE Bond를 사용하였다. 이중 접착 술식을 적용한 군에서만 상아질 접착제 처리 후, 모든 시편에 임시 합착제를 도포하였다. 이후 임시 합착제를 제거하고 상아질 접착제 적용 후 유리봉에 레진 합착제를 도포하여 상아질 면에 접착하였다. 미세전단결합 강도를 측정하고 접착 계면을 주사전자현미경으로 관찰하였다. 1. 전통 합착 술식이 이중 접착 술식보다 높은 미세전단결합강도를 보였으나 통계학적 유의 차가 없었다. 2. Freegenol이 Propac보다 높은 미세전단결합강도를 보였으나 유의차가 없었다. 3. 미세전단결합강도는 이중 접착 술식 을 적용한 경우 Clearfil SE Bond가 One-step, All-Bond 2보다 유의성 있게 높았으나(p<0.05) One-step, All-Bond 2 간 유의차는 없었다. 4. 전자현미경 소견에서 All-Bond 2와 One-Step을 사용한 군은 길고 수많은 resin tag가 관찰되었다. 본 연구 결과 전통 합착 술식과 비교하여 이중 접착 술식의 우수함을 확인하지 못하였다.

• Advances in concrete construction
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.265-279
• /
• 2022

The roughness of substrate concrete interfaces before new concrete placement has a major effect on the interface bond behaviour. However, there are challenges associated with the consistency of the final roughness interface prepared using conventional roughness preparation methods which influences the interface bond performance. In this study, five quantitative interface roughness textures with different roughness tooth angles, depths, and tooth distribution were created to ensure consistency of interface roughness and to evaluate the bond behaviour at a precast and new concrete interface using the splitting tensile test, slant shear test, and double-shear test. In addition, smooth interface specimens and two separate the pitting interface roughness were also utilized. Obtained results indicate that the quantitative roughness has a very limited effect on the interface tensile bond strength if no extra micro-roughness or bonding agent is added at the interface. The roughness method however causes enhanced shear bond strength at the interface. Increased tooth depth improved both the tensile and shear bond strength of the interfaces, while the tooth distribution mainly influenced the shear bond strength. Major failure modes of the test specimens include interface failure, splitting cracks, and sliding failure, and are influenced by the tooth depth and tooth distribution. Furthermore, the interface properties were obtained and presented while a comparison between the different testing methods, in terms of bond strength, was performed.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.30-36
• /
• 2015

Objectives: This study was performed to determine whether the combined use of one-bottle self-etch adhesives and composite resins from same manufacturers have better bond strengths than combinations of adhesive and resins from different manufacturers. Materials and Methods: 25 experimental micro-shear bond test groups were made from combinations of five dentin adhesives and five composite resins with extracted human molars stored in saline for 24 hr. Testing was performed using the wire-loop method and a universal testing machine. Bond strength data was statistically analyzed using two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test. Results: Two way ANOVA revealed significant differences for the factors of dentin adhesives and composite resins, and significant interaction effect (p < 0.001). All combinations with Xeno V (Dentsply De Trey) and Clearfil $S^3$ Bond (Kuraray Dental) adhesives showed no significant differences in micro-shear bond strength, but other adhesives showed significant differences depending on the composite resin (p < 0.05). Contrary to the other adhesives, Xeno V and BondForce (Tokuyama Dental) had higher bond strengths with the same manufacturer's composite resin than other manufacturer's composite resin. Conclusions: Not all combinations of adhesive and composite resin by same manufacturers failed to show significantly higher bond strengths than mixed manufacturer combinations.