• 제목/요약/키워드: Micro-Scratch

검색결과 82건 처리시간 0.017초

전기도금법을 이용한 FCCL용 구리박막 제조시 레벨러의 영향 연구 (The Effects of Levelers on Electroplating of Thin Copper Foil for FCCL)

  • 강인석;구연수;이재호
    • 마이크로전자및패키징학회지
    • /
    • 제19권2호
    • /
    • pp.67-72
    • /
    • 2012
  • 최근에 전자 산업 분야에서 장치의 고용량을 구현 하기 위해 구동 drive IC의 선폭은 좁아지고 집적도는 증가하고 있다. 이러한 반도체, 전자 산업 분야의 초소형화, 고밀도화에 따라 FCCL(Flexible Copper Clad Laminate)의 표면 품질이 더욱 중요해 지고 있다. FCCL의 표면 결함으로는 돌기, 스크레치, 덴트 등이 있다. 특히 돌기가 표면에 존재할 경우 후속 공정에서 쇼트와 같은 불량을 유발할 수 있으며, 제품의 품질 저하를 야기 시킬 수 있다. 하지만 표면에 돌기가 존재한다 하더라도, 전해액의 레벨링 특성이 우수하다면 돌기의 성장을 막을 수 있다.평탄하고, 결함이 없는 도금표면을 얻기 위해서는 첨가제의 역할이 필수적이다. 평탄한 구리 표면을 형성하기 위해서 stock solution에 가속제, 억제제, 레벨러를 첨가하였다. 레벨러를 첨가하는 이유는 평탄한 표면을 얻고, 돌기의 형성을 억제하기 위함이다. 구리도금 표면 형상을 향상시키기 위한 레벨러로는 SO(Safranin O), MV(Methylene Violet), AB(Alcian Blue), JGB(Janus Green B), DB(Diazine Black) and PVP(Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone)가 사용되었다. 도금 첨가제와 도금 조건의 변화를 통해 도금시레벨링 특성을 향상시키고, 레벨링 특성 측정을 위해 니켈 인공돌기를 제작 한 후 레벨링 특성을 측정하였다.

지대주의 반복적인 착탈에 따른 임플랜트 고정체의 external hexagon과 지대주 internal hexagon의 변화에 관한 연구 (SURFACE CHANCE OF EXTERNAL HEXAGON OF IMPLANT FIXTURE AND INTERNAL HEXAGON OF ABUTMENT AFTER REPEATED DELIVERY AND REMOVAL OF ABUTMENT)

  • 정석원;김희중;정재헌
    • 대한치과보철학회지
    • /
    • 제43권4호
    • /
    • pp.528-543
    • /
    • 2005
  • Statement of problem: Repeated delivery and removal of abutment cause some changes such as wear, scratch or defect of hexagonal structure. It may increase the value of rotational freedom(RF) between hexagonal structures. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surface changes and rotational freedom between the external hexagon of the implant fixture and internal hexagon of abutment after repeated delivery and removal under SEM and toolmaker's microscope. Materials and methods: Implant systems used for this study were 3i and Avana. Seven pail's of implant fixture, abutment and abutment screws for each system were selected and all fixtures were perpendicularly mounted in liquid unsaturated polyesther with dental surveyor. Each one was embedded beneath the platform of fixture. Surfaces of hexagonal structure before repeated closing and opening of abutment were observed using SEM and rotational freedom was measured by using toolmaker's microscope. Each abutment was secured to the implant future by each abutment screw with recommended torque value using a digital torque controller and was repeatedly delivered and removed by 20 times respectively. After experiment, evaluation for the change of hexagonal structures and measurement of rotational freedom were performed. Result : The results were as follows; 1. Wear of contact area between implant fixture and abutment was considerable in both 3i and Avana system. Scratches and defects were frequently observed at the line-angle of hexagonal structures of implant fixture and abutment. 2. In the SEM view of the external hexagon of implant fixture, the point-angle areas at the corner edge of hexagon were severely worn out in both systems. It was more notable in the case of 3i systems than in that of Avana systems. 3. In the SEM view of the internal hexagon of abutment, Gingi-Hue abutment of 3i systems showed severe wear in micro-stop contacts that were machined into the corners to prevent rotation and cemented abutment of Avana systems showed wear in both surface area adjacent to the corner mating with external hexagon of implant fixture. 4 The mean values of rotational freedom between the external hexagon of the implant fixture and internal hexagon of abutment were 0.48$\pm$0.04$^{\circ}$ in pre-tested 3i systems and 1.18$\pm$0.25$^{\circ}$ after test, and 1.80$\pm$0.04$^{\circ}$ in pre-tested Avana systems and 2.61$\pm$0.16$^{\circ}$ after test. 5. Changes of rotational freedom after test shouted statistical)y a significant increase in both 3i and Avana systems(P<0.05, paired t-test). 6. Statistically, there was no significant difference between amount of increase in the rotational freedom of 3i systems and amount of increase in that of Avana ones(P>0.05, unpaired t-test). Conclusion: Conclusively, it was considered that repeated delivery and remove of abutment by 20 times would not have influence on screw joint stability. However, it caused statistically the significant change of rotational freedom in tested systems. Therefore, it is suggested that repeated delivery and remove of abutment should be minimal as possible as it could be and be done carefully Additionally, it is suggested that the means or treatment to prevent the wear of mating components should be devised.