• 경영과학
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.11-29
• /
• 1997

This paper presents the better efficient evaluation of the Small and Medium Enterprises by use of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology under intersectional dependence relations. The five Small and Medium Enterprises alternative will be evaluated by Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process(FAHP) based on entropy weight in this study. A case study is presented to illustrate the use of entropy weight measurement with intersectional dependence problems. These problems are evaluated seven criteria : market criteria, thchnology criteria, management ability criteria, planning criteria, propulsion ability criteria, project propulsion basis criteria, propulsion result criteria.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2005년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.117-121
• /
• 2005

This paper reviews updated criteria for a project management body of knowledge(PMBOK) : 2004. The updated PMBOK model is generally recognized as good practice. Specific criteria are suggested for a project management body of knowledge.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권7호
• /
• pp.391-401
• /
• 2020

The objective of this study is to prioritize the Total Quality Management (TQM) factors based on fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in Vietnamese supporting industries. Through an in-depth literature review, eight criteria were identified. These criteria were then divided into 32 sub-criteria. The fuzzy AHP is used to determine the percent weightings of eight categories of performance criteria that were identified via a review of the quality-management literature. These criteria include management commitment, role of the quality department, training and education, continuous improvement, quality policies, quality data and reporting, communication to improve quality, and customer satisfaction orientation. An empirical analysis of the criteria of each stage using the fuzzy AHP methodology and the expert opinion of quality management are used to evaluate the percent weightings of the criteria and sub-criteria that are synonymous with TQM implementation. The results showed that management commitment is the most critical factor; among sub-criteria, supports and responsibilities of top management is the most important. The study also identified the rank order of critical success factors of TQM. The findings suggest a generic hierarchy model for organizations to prioritize the critical factors and formulate strategies for implementing TQM in supporting industries, as well as other industries in Vietnam.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.475-486
• /
• 2013

Purpose: In this study, we propose the evaluation criteria and method for selecting intensive management items which, in order to improve the parts management.1) Methods: Parts management such as MIL-STD-3018, SD-19, SD-22 is used for devising the proposed evaluation criteria and method of selecting intensive management items. Especially, proposed evaluation criteria is customized by using AHP method. Results: We approved the importance of evaluation criteria for selecting intensive management items using AHP method. In production step, the parts problem record, the parts reliability, the supplier reliability, DMSM S1). In development step, the parts problem record, a counterfeit, the parts reliability, MTTF2). Conclusion: The evaluation criteria and method for selecting intensive management items which is applicable to the domestic weapon acquisition environment is proposed.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제15호
• /
• pp.185-218
• /
• 2007

공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률이 시행되면서 업무과정에 기반을 둔 기록관리체계 도입 기관은 기록관리기준표를 운영해야 한다. 기록물관리기준표는 정부기능분류체계에 기반을 두고 업무설명, 보존기간, 보존기간 책정사유, 비치기록물 해당 여부와 공개여부 및 접근권한 등의 관리기준을 포함하고 있다. 과거에도 이런 기준들은 분산적으로 존재했었지만, 전자기록환경에서 '기록관리기준'이라는 범주로 묶여 더욱 체계적이고 합리적으로 운영되어야 할 필요성이 커졌다. 이 연구에서는 이미 기록관리기준을 도입 운영했던 사례를 살펴보고, 각각의 관리기준을 작성하기 위해서는 어떤 내용과 방법으로 조사가 이루어져야 하는지를 제시하였다. 기록관리기준표를 운영하는 목적과 목표에 따라 제대로 관리기준조사가 이루어지고, 그 결과들이 시스템으로 운영되어야만 기록관리의 일관성을 유지하면서 다이내믹하게 업무와 기록가치의 변화를 반영할 수 있을 것이다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.19-33
• /
• 2012

We analyze the problems of curriculum management and accreditation criteria through data analysis and survey on domestic and foreign curriculums and accreditation criteria, propose an efficient curriculum model based on educational realities and requirements of all university members and suggest improvement direction for more efficient curriculum management and accreditation criteria. For this study, we investigate curriculum data of several domestic and foreign universities, analyze the datum in various aspects and conduct a survey on curriculum management and accreditation criteria for collecting extensive opinion of university members on curriculum management and accreditation criteria. We expect that the proposed curriculum model and improvement direction of curriculum and accreditation criteria will help university members to efficiently manage accreditation programs.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2007년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.311-317
• /
• 2007

This study introduces 2007 criteria of Malcom Baldridge National Quality Award (MBNQA) for performance excellence. Baldridge criteria is composed of the seven categories such as leadership, strategic planning, customer and market focus, measurement, analysis, and knowledge management, workforce focus, process management, and results. Moreover this paper proposes various integrated systems with MBNQA.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.95-103
• /
• 2016

대다수의 흙막이 공사 계측현장에서 적용하고 있는 절대치 관리방법은 관리기준치와 계측결과를 절대 비교함으로서 공사현장의 안전성을 평가하는 기법이다. 따라서, 안전성 평가의 판단기준이 되는 관리기준치는 평가결과에 직접적으로 영향을 미치게 된다. 즉 아무리 최적의 계측시스템이 적용된 현장이라고 하더라도 관리기준치가 타당하지 않으면, 공사현장의 안전성을 정확히 판단할 수 없으므로 관리기준치의 선정은 매우 중요하다. 그러나 실질적으로 현장 기술자 등은 기존 절대치관리기준치에 대한 신뢰성이 매우 낮으며 관리기준치의 수정보완의 필요성을 인식하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 계측관리기준치의 수정보완 필요성에 대한 조사결과를 바탕으로 하여 흙막이 구조물의 거동 중 가장 기본이 되며 중요한 흙막이 벽체의 변위에 대한 계측결과를 토대로 확률론적 이론에 의해 관리기준치를 보다 적절하게 설정하여 적용하는 연구를 수행하였다. 본 연구에서는 계측관리기법 중 시공 전에 설정된 관리기준치와 시공 시 측정된 설측치를 비교 검토하여 그 시점에서 공사의 안전성을 확인하는 방법인 절대치관리방법을 적용하여 관리기준치를 수정하였다.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제53권4호
• /
• pp.1224-1235
• /
• 2021

An integrated waste management approach for irradiated graphite was developed during the European Commission project 'Treatment and Disposal of Irradiated Graphite and other Carbonaceous Waste'. This included the identification of potential options for the management of irradiated graphite, taking account of storage, retrieval, treatment and disposal methods. This paper describes how these options can be assessed using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for a case study relating to a generic power reactor. Criteria have been defined to account for safety, environmental, economic and socio-political factors, including radiological impact, resource usage, economic costs and risks. The impact of each option against each criterion has been assessed using data from the project and the wider literature. A linear additive approach has been used to convert the calculated impacts to scores. To account for the relative importance of the criteria, example weightings were allocated. This application has shown that MCDA approaches can be used to support complex decisions regarding irradiated graphite management, accounting for a wide range of criteria. Use of this approach by individual countries or organisations will need to account for the specific options, scores, weightings and constraints that apply, based on their national strategies, regulatory requirements and public acceptability.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.115-122
• /
• 2011

The critical role played by manufacturing performance measurement systems in achieving competitive success is increasingly recognized. Developing an integrated performance measurement model is significant for strategic management. This study consist of several principal steps. Performance criteria from the literature and an questionnaire were utilized prior to building the performance model. The AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is utilized to evaluate the weight of each criterion when generating the performance measurement model for Korea automobile parts manufacturing company. AHP analysis showed clear difference in the priority between 5 criteria and 24 sub-criteria in terms of manufacturing performance of Korean automobile parts manufacturing company. The result of priority evaluation in the 5 criteria of 2nd level was ranked quality, cost, delivery, employee, flexibility. And the critical sub-criteria in the 24 sub-criteria of 3rd level was ranked claim rate, process defect rate, outsourcing parts defect rate, ability to quality management innovation, claim cost, etc.