QuEChERS법 및 LC-MS/MS를 이용한 농산물 중 Oxytetracycline의 잔류시험법 개발 및 검증 (Development and Validation of the Analytical Method for Oxytetracycline in Agricultural Products using QuEChERS and LC-MS/MS)
-
- 한국식품위생안전성학회지
- /
- 제34권3호
- /
- pp.227-234
- /
- 2019
옥시테트라사이클린은 침투이행성 살균제로 배추, 고추 등의 농산물에 무름병, 줄기속마름병에 효과가 있다. 본 연구는 농산물 중 기준신설 예정농약 옥시테트라사이클린이 농산물 대하여 등록되지 않아 이에 대한 공정시험법을 개발하기 위하여 수행되었다. 옥시테트라사이클린의 잔류물의 정의는 미국, 일본의 경우 농산물 대상으로 모화합물로 설정되어 있다. 현재, 국내에서는 농산물 중 옥시테트라사이클린의 잔류물의 정의 및 잔류허용기준이 설정되어있지 않고, 국내 농산물(고추 등)에 대한 잔류허용기준 신설이 최초 요청되었으며 국내 유통 농산물 중 잔류량에 대한 안전관리 확보를 위해 잔류물의 정의를 모화합물로 규정하고 적부판정을 위한 공정시험법을 개발하고자 하였다. 옥시테트라사이클린의 물리 화학적 특성을 고려하여 QuEChERS법을 이용한 추출 및 정제법을 최적화하여 LC-MS/MS에 의한 분석법을 확립하였다. 수용성 유기용매인 메탄올을 추출 용매로 사용하여 pH 조절 및 염화나트륨을 첨가하여 추출법을 최적화하고, d-SPE 흡착제를 이용하여 간섭물질을 효과적으로 제거하여 정제법을 확립하였다. 옥시테트라사이클린의 결정계수(
한국 시설원예 농업과 수경(양액)재배 방식은 증가하는 추세로 발생되는 배액(폐양액)의 관리 필요성이 확대되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 배출되는 폐양액의 비료 성분 양을 가격으로 평가하여 수처리비용 절감과 비료성분 재활용이라는 두가지 측면에서 기술개발과 활용 가능성을 알아보았다. 연구는 배출 배액의 수질환경 특성을 분석한 선행연구에서 제시한 분석결과를 바탕으로 비료성분의 유실 경제성을 평가하는 것으로 배출되는 배액의 총 배출량은 연간 259.7L·m2·-1을 적용하여 분석에 사용하였다. 토마토, 파프리카, 오이, 딸기 등 작물별 배액(폐양액)의 주요 수질 분석 결과를 바탕으로 평가하였으며, 인(P) 성분의 경우 인산(P2O5)의 양으로 환산하여 분석되었다. 질소(N)의 양은 토마토 1145.90kg·ha-1, 파프리카 920.43kg·ha-1, 오이 804.16kg·ha-1, 딸기가 405.83kg·ha-1로 평가되고 P2O5의 비료성분은 파프리카 830.65kg·ha-1, 토마토 622.32kg·ha-1, 오이 477.67kg·ha-1, 딸기 240.9·ha-1의 양만큼 배출하는 것으로 계산할 수 있다. 이 외에도 칼륨(K), 칼슘(Ca), 마그네슘(Mg)을 비롯해 철(Fe), 망간(Mn) 등 미량원소도 배출되는 것으로 분석되었다. 시중판매 비료가격을 기준으로 평균하여 계산한 항목별 kg당 가격은 질소(N) 860.7원, 인(P) 2,378.2원, 칼륨(K) 2,121.7원, 칼슘(Ca) 981.2원, 마그네슘(Mg) 1,036.3원, 철(Fe) 126,076.9원, 망간(Mn) 6,232.1원, 아연(Zn) 15,825.0원, 구리(Cu) 31,362.0원, 붕소(B) 4,238.0원, 몰리브덴(Mo) 149,041.7원으로 평가할 수 있다. 시중판매 비료가격을 기준으로 평균하여 계산한 항목별 kg당 가격과 앞서 분석한 작물별 폐양액의 농도, 수경재배의 평균적인 연간배출량 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 연간 유실되는 작물별 비료 유실액을 산출하였다. 분석결과 토마토의 경우 6,995,622.3원, 파프리카는 7,384,923.8원, 오이는 5,091,607.9원의, 딸기는 2,429,290.6원으로 평가되어 수경재배 4가지 작물 평균은 1ha 재배면적 기준 5,475,361.1원의 비료성분 유실이 확인되었다. 수경재배 배액을 하천으로 유출시켜 오염원으로 처리하는것 보다 배출 전 자체 처리 또는 타작물 활용을 통해 관리한다면 수처리 비용 절감과 더불어 가치있는 재이용 가능한 비료성분이 될 수 있다고 기대하였다.
The wall shear stress in the vicinity of end-to end anastomoses under steady flow conditions was measured using a flush-mounted hot-film anemometer(FMHFA) probe. The experimental measurements were in good agreement with numerical results except in flow with low Reynolds numbers. The wall shear stress increased proximal to the anastomosis in flow from the Penrose tubing (simulating an artery) to the PTFE: graft. In flow from the PTFE graft to the Penrose tubing, low wall shear stress was observed distal to the anastomosis. Abnormal distributions of wall shear stress in the vicinity of the anastomosis, resulting from the compliance mismatch between the graft and the host artery, might be an important factor of ANFH formation and the graft failure. The present study suggests a correlation between regions of the low wall shear stress and the development of anastomotic neointimal fibrous hyperplasia(ANPH) in end-to-end anastomoses. 30523 T00401030523 ^x Air pressure decay(APD) rate and ultrafiltration rate(UFR) tests were performed on new and saline rinsed dialyzers as well as those roused in patients several times. C-DAK 4000 (Cordis Dow) and CF IS-11 (Baxter Travenol) reused dialyzers obtained from the dialysis clinic were used in the present study. The new dialyzers exhibited a relatively flat APD, whereas saline rinsed and reused dialyzers showed considerable amount of decay. C-DAH dialyzers had a larger APD(11.70
Just before the Korean War, the total number of the North Korean troops was 198,380, while that of the ROK(Republic of Korea) army troops 105,752. That is, the total number of the ROK army troops at that time was 53.3% of the total number of the North Korean army. As of December 2008, the total number of the North Korean troops is estimated to be 1,190,000, while that of the ROK troops is 655,000, so the ROK army maintains 55.04% of the total number of the North Korean troops. If the ROK army continues to reduce its troops according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the total number of its troops will be 517,000 m 2020. If North Korea maintains the current status(l,190,000 troops), the number of the ROK troops will be 43.4% of the North Korean army. In terms of units, just before the Korean War, the number of the ROK army divisions and regiments was 80% and 44.8% of North Korean army. As of December 2008, North Korea maintains 86 divisions and 69 regiments. Compared to the North Korean army, the ROK army maintains 46 Divisions (53.4% of North Korean army) and 15 regiments (21.3% of North Korean army). If the ROK army continue to reduce the military units according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of ROK army divisions will be 28(13 Active Division, 4 Mobilization Divisions and 11 Local Reserve Divisions), while that of the North Korean army will be 86 in 2020. In that case, the number of divisions of the ROK army will be 32.5% of North Korean army. During the Korean war, North Korea suddenly invaded the Republic of Korea and occupied its capital 3 days after the war began. At that time, the ROK army maintained 80% of army divisions, compared to the North Korean army. The lesson to be learned from this is that, if the ROK army is forced to disperse its divisions because of the simultaneous invasion of North Korea and attack of guerrillas in home front areas, the Republic of Korea can be in a serious military danger, even though it maintains 80% of military divisions of North Korea. If the ROK army promotes the plans in [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of military units of the ROK army will be 32.5% of that of the North Korean army. This ratio is 2.4 times lower than that of the time when the Korean war began, and in this case, 90% of total military power should be placed in the DMZ area. If 90% of military power is placed in the DMZ area, few troops will be left for the defense of home front. In addition, if the ROK army continues to reduce the troops, it can allow North Korea to have asymmetrical superiority in military force and it will eventually exert negative influence on the stability and peace of the Korean peninsular. On the other hand, it should be reminded that, during the Korean War, the Republic of Korea was attacked by North Korea, though it kept 53.3% of troops, compared to North Korea. It should also be reminded that, as of 2008, the ROK army is defending its territory with the troops 55.04% of North Korea. Moreover, the national defense is assisted by 25,120 troops of the US Forces in Korea. In case the total number of the ROK troops falls below 43.4% of the North Korean army, it may cause social unrest about the national security and may lead North Korea's misjudgement. Besides, according to Lanchester strategy, the party with weaker military power (60% compared to the party with stronger military power) has the 4.1% of winning possibility. Therefore, if we consider the fact that the total number of the ROK army troops is 55.04% of that of the North Korean army, the winning possibility of the ROK army is not higher than 4.1%. If the total number of ROK troops is reduced to 43.4% of that of North Korea, the winning possibility will be lower and the military operations will be in critically difficult situation. [Military Reform Plan 2020] rums at the reduction of troops and units of the ground forces under the policy of 'select few'. However, the problem is that the financial support to achieve this goal is not secured. Therefore, the promotion of [Military Reform Plan 2020] may cause the weakening of military defence power in 2020. Some advanced countries such as Japan, UK, Germany, and France have promoted the policy of 'select few'. However, what is to be noted is that the national security situation of those countries is much different from that of Korea. With the collapse of the Soviet Unions and European communist countries, the military threat of those European advanced countries has almost disappeared. In addition, the threats those advanced countries are facing are not wars in national level, but terrorism in international level. To cope with the threats like terrorism, large scaled army trops would not be necessary. So those advanced European countries can promote the policy of 'select few'. In line with this, those European countries put their focuses on the development of military sections that deal with non-military operations and protection from unspecified enemies. That is, those countries are promoting the policy of 'select few', because they found that the policy is suitable for their national security environment. Moreover, since they are pursuing common interest under the European Union(EU) and they can form an allied force under NATO, it is natural that they are pursing the 'select few' policy. At present, NATO maintains the larger number of troops(2,446,000) than Russia(l,027,000) to prepare for the potential threat of Russia. The situation of japan is also much different from that of Korea. As a country composed of islands, its prime military focus is put on the maritime defense. Accordingly, the development of ground force is given secondary focus. The japanese government promotes the policy to develop technology-concentrated small size navy and air-forces, instead of maintaining large-scaled ground force. In addition, because of the 'Peace Constitution' that was enacted just after the end of World War II, japan cannot maintain troops more than 240,000. With the limited number of troops (240,000), japan has no choice but to promote the policy of 'select few'. However, the situation of Korea is much different from the situations of those countries. The Republic of Korea is facing the threat of the North Korean Army that aims at keeping a large-scale military force. In addition, the countries surrounding Korea are also super powers containing strong military forces. Therefore, to cope with the actual threat of present and unspecified threat of future, the importance of maintaining a carefully calculated large-scale military force cannot be denied. Furthermore, when considering the fact that Korea is in a peninsular, the Republic of Korea must take it into consideration the tradition of continental countries' to maintain large-scale military powers. Since the Korean War, the ROK army has developed the technology-force combined military system, maintaining proper number of troops and units and pursuing 'select few' policy at the same time. This has been promoted with the consideration of military situation in the Koran peninsular and the cooperation of ROK-US combined forces. This kind of unique military system that cannot be found in other countries can be said to be an insightful one for the preparation for the actual threat of North Korea and the conflicts between continental countries and maritime countries. In addition, this kind of technology-force combined military system has enabled us to keep peace in Korea. Therefore, it would be desirable to maintain this technology-force combined military system until the reunification of the Korean peninsular. Furthermore, it is to be pointed out that blindly following the 'select few' policy of advanced countries is not a good option, because it is ignoring the military strategic situation of the Korean peninsular. If the Republic of Korea pursues the reduction of troops and units radically without consideration of the threat of North Korea and surrounding countries, it could be a significant strategic mistake. In addition, the ROK army should keep an eye on the fact the European advanced countries and Japan that are not facing direct military threats are spending more defense expenditures than Korea. If the ROK army reduces military power without proper alternatives, it would exert a negative effect on the stable economic development of Korea and peaceful reunification of the Korean peninsular. Therefore, the desirable option would be to focus on the development of quality of forces, maintaining proper size and number of troops and units under the technology-force combined military system. The tableau above shows that the advanced countries like the UK, Germany, Italy, and Austria spend more defense expenditure per person than the Republic of Korea, although they do not face actual military threats, and that they keep achieving better economic progress than the countries that spend less defense expenditure. Therefore, it would be necessary to adopt the merits of the defense systems of those advanced countries. As we have examined, it would be desirable to maintain the current size and number of troops and units, to promote 'select few' policy with increased defense expenditure, and to strengthen the technology-force combined military system. On the basis of firm national security, the Republic of Korea can develop efficient policies for reunification and prosperity, and jump into the status of advanced countries. Therefore, the plans to reduce troops and units in [Military Reform Plan 2020] should be reexamined. If it is difficult for the ROK army to maintain its size of 655,000 troops because of low birth rate, the plans to establish the prompt mobilization force or to adopt drafting system should be considered for the maintenance of proper number of troops and units. From now on, the Republic of Korean government should develop plans to keep peace as well as to prepare unexpected changes in the Korean peninsular. For the achievement of these missions, some options can be considered. The first one is to maintain the same size of military troops and units as North Korea. The second one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea in terms of military force index. The third one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea, with the combination of the prompt mobilization force and the troops in active service under the system of technology-force combined military system. At present, it would be not possible for the ROK army to maintain such a large-size military force as North Korea (1,190,000 troops and 86 units). So it would be rational to maintain almost the same level of military force as North Korea with the combination of the troops on the active list and the prompt mobilization forces. In other words, with the combination of the troops in active service (60%) and the prompt mobilization force (40%), the ROK army should develop the strategies to harmonize technology and forces. The Korean government should also be prepared for the strategic flexibility of USFK, the possibility of American policy change about the location of foreign army, radical unexpected changes in North Korea, the emergence of potential threat, surrounding countries' demand for Korean force for the maintenance of regional stability, and demand for international cooperation against terrorism. For this, it is necessary to develop new approaches toward the proper number and size of troops and units. For instance, to prepare for radical unexpected political or military changes in North Korea, the Republic of Korea should have plans to protect a large number of refugees, to control arms and people, to maintain social security, and to keep orders in North Korea. From the experiences of other countries, it is estimated that 115,000 to 230,000 troops, plus ten thousands of police are required to stabilize the North Korean society, in the case radical unexpected military or political change happens in North Korea. In addition, if the Republic of Korea should perform the release of hostages, control of mass destruction weapons, and suppress the internal wars in North Korea, it should send 460,000 troops to North Korea. Moreover, if the Republic of Korea wants to stop the attack of North Korea and flow of refugees in DMZ area, at least 600,000 troops would be required. In sum, even if the ROK army maintains 600,000 troops, it may need additional 460,000 troops to prepare for unexpected radical changes in North Korea. For this, it is necessary to establish the prompt mobilization force whose size and number are almost the same as the troops in active service. In case the ROK army keeps 650,000 troops, the proper number of the prompt mobilization force would be 460,000 to 500,000.
The pharmacological and microbiological studies of Cefoperazone (T-1551, Toyama Chemical Co., Japan) were conducted in vitro and in vivo. The studies included stability and physicochemical characteristics, antimicrobial activity, animal and human pharmacokinetics, animal pharmacodynamics and safety evaluation of Cefoperazone sodium for injection. 1) Stability and physicochemical characteristics. Sodium salt of cefoperazone for injection had a general appearance of white crystalline powder which contained 0.5% water, and of which melting point was
가잠에 있어서 피해가 많은 전염성 연화병(Flacherie Virus; FV)과 농핵병 바이러스(Densonucleosis virus; DNV)의 증식에 관한 연구를 행하기 위하여 서당밀도 구배 초원심분리법에 의한 양바이러스의 정제 및 전자현미경에 의한 관찰, 바이러스 감염잠의 중장과 체액에서의 핵산과 단백질의 변동 및 감염중장 피막세포의 전자현미경에 의한 병리조직학적 관찰 등, 일연의 조사를 통하여 다음과 같은 연구결과를 얻었다. 1. 서당밀도구배에 의한 초원심분리법을 이용하여 FV 및 DNV를 분획한 결과, base line이 낮고 좌우상칭의 단일 peak를 나타내는 전형적인 바이러스 분획을 얻었으며, 또한 이들 바이러스의 negative 염색에 의한 전자현미경 관찰에서 FV는 27nm, DNV는 21nm의 균일한 구형입자임이 확인되었다. 2. 두 바이러스 감염잠의 체중은 바이러스 접종 6일 후부터, 중장중은 바이러스 접종 3일 후부터 건전잠에 비해 뚜렷한 감소를 나타냈다. 3. DNA의 양적 변화는 FV 및 DNV 감염잠에서 공히 중장에서는 전기간을 통해 건전잠에서 보다 높았고, 체액에서는 바이러스 접종 초ㆍ중기에는 큰 변화가 없고 바이러스 접종 7일 이후에는 건전잠에서 보다 훨씬 낮았다. 4. RNA의 양적 변화는 FV 및 DNV 감염잠에서 다같이 바이러스 접종 초기에 중장에서는 건전잠에 비해 높았고, 체액에서는 건전잠에 비해 매우 낮았으나, 바이러스 접종 말기에는 중장 및 체액의 경우 공히 건전잠에서 보다 현저히 낮았으며 그 정도는 DNV 감염잠에서 더 심했다. 5. FV 및 DNV 감염잠에서 중장과 체액의 단백질은 바이러스 접종 중기까지는 건전잠에 비해 큰 변화가 없었으나, 접종 말기에서는 건전잠에서 보다 월등히 낮았다. 6. 바이러스 접종 8일 후의 FV 및 DNV 감염잠 중장 RNA 전기영동상은 건전잠의 중장 RNA인 26S, 17S, 5S 및 4S의 4종 band와 동일했다. 7. FV 및 DNV 감염잠의 중장 단백질 전기영동상은 바이러스 접종 1일과 5일 후에는 건전잠의 것과 큰 차이가 없고, 접종 8일 후에는 건전잠에 존재하는 이동도가 낮은 L band가 양 바이러스 감염잠에서는 공히 소실되는 반면, 건전잠에서 볼 수 없는 이동도가 중간인 M band가 새로이 나타났으며 비교적 이동도가 높은 건전잠의 N band는 양 바이러스 감염잠에서는 2개로 분리되었다. 8. 체액단백질의 전기영동상은 FV 및 DNV감염잠 공히 건전잠의 것과 유사하나, 바이러스 접종 8일 후에는 양적인 감소를 나타내어 건전잠의 약 40%에 지나지 않았다. 9. FV 감염중장조직을 pyronin-methyl green 2종 염색을 하여 광학현미경으로 관찰한 결과, 바이러스 접종 8일 후의 중장원동세포내에서 A형 및 B형 봉입체가 형성되었음을 확인하였다. 10. FV감염 중장조직세포의 전자현미경 관찰에서는 바이러스 접종 5일 후에 배상세포의 'cytoplasmic wall'이 비대해지고 그 내부에 virus-specific vesicle이 형성되었으며, 바이러스 접종 8일 후에는 virus-specific vesicle, 바이러스 입자, linear structure, tubular structure 및 전자밀도가 높은 matrix 등의 바이러스 감염에 대한 특이적인 구조물이 배상세포의 세포질에서 관찰되었으며, microvilli내에서 바이러스 입자의 존재도 확정되었다. 특히 virus-specific vesicle 주위에서는 전자밀도가 높은 구형의 바이러스 입자 유사체가 관찰되었는데, 이것은 virus-specific vesicle 주위에서 바이러스 조립이 일어나는 것을 추정된다. 한편 원통세포 내에서 봉입체 관찰되고, 변형소구화된 배상세포가 중장강으로 탈락되는 것이 관찰되었다. 11. DNV감염 중장조직을 acridine orange 염색을 하여 형광현미경으로 관찰한 결과, DNV접종 5일 후에 본 바이러스 증식 장소인 원동세포핵의 비대가 뚜렷이 관찰되었다. 12. 전자현미경에 의해 DNV감염 중장조직세포를 관찰한 결과, 바이러스 접종 5일 후에 원동세포 핵내의 인이 소형 과립으로 붕괴되어 산재되었고, 접종 8일후에는 전자밀도가 높은 virogenic stroma가 출현하였으며, 감염 말기로 추정되는 핵내의 전자밀도가 전자보다 낮고 더욱 확대되어 핵의 대부분을 차지하는 virogenic stroma도 관찰되었다. 또한 이들 virogenic stroma내에서 바이러스 입자유사체가 관찰되는 것으로 보아 이 virogenic stroma는 바이러스 전구물질의 합성 및 바이러스 조립장소임을 시사하고 있다.