• Title/Summary/Keyword: Lichenoid dysplasia

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Lichenoid Dysplasia Misdiagnosed as Oral Lichen Planus: 3-Year Follow-up Case Report

  • Shim, Young-Joo;Yoon, Jung-Hoon
    • Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
    • /
    • v.40 no.4
    • /
    • pp.163-168
    • /
    • 2015
  • Lichenoid dysplasia is a lichenoid features with epithelial dysplasia clinically and histopathologically similar to oral lichen planus. It can be clinically mistaken for oral lichen planus, but has histopathologic features of dysplasia and a true malignant predisposition. The clinician should be able to differentiate between oral lichen planus and lichenoid dysplasia for the proper management. We experienced a 75-year-old man with erosive, erythematous lesion on the left buccal mucosa previously diagnosed as oral lichen planus. He underwent surgical excision and the final histopathological result confirmed it to be lichenoid dysplasia with massive candidal infection. We report this case with a review of the related literature.

LICHENOID DYSPLASIA ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIPLE LEUKOPLAKIA : A CASE REPORT (다발성 백반증을 동반한 태선양 이형성증)

  • Ahn, Shin-Young;Moon, Chul-Woong;Yoon, Jung-Hoon;Kim, Su-Gwan
    • Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    • /
    • v.27 no.6
    • /
    • pp.565-569
    • /
    • 2005
  • Lichenoid dysplasia is a lesion similar to oral lichen planus with epithelial dysplasia. It can be clinically mistaken for oral lichen planus, but has histologic features of dysplasia and a true malignant predisposition. It is not a variant or transitional form of lichen planus but, instead, represents a distinct entity that has a true potential for malignant transformation. In addition to abnormal epithelial maturation and cytology, lichenoid dysplasia exhibits other histologic features that separate it from oral lichen planus. Lichenoid dysplasia and lichen planus share many clinical and microscopic features, leading to the frequent misdiagnosis of unrecognized lichenoid dysplasia as lichen planus. We experienced a case of lichenoid dysplasia in the oral mucosa. We treated this patient with surgical excision. The patient has now been followed for two months. It is important to recognize this precancerous condition and inspect the excision site and remaining oral mucosa during long-term follow-up.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Histopathological Appearance Between Oral Leukoplakia and Lichen Planus (구강 백반증과 편평태선의 임상·병리조직학적 소견 비교 분석)

  • Ryu, Mi-Heon
    • Journal of dental hygiene science
    • /
    • v.5 no.4
    • /
    • pp.199-204
    • /
    • 2005
  • Background : Oral leukoplakia(OL) and lichen planus(LP) are common soft tissue lesions characterized by white plaque or striae with erosion. The clinical characteristics of these diseases are similar but the cause and clinical course of them are very different. I compared OL with LP by analysizing clinical and histopathological characteristics and follow up study. Patients and methods : The clinical analysis of 200 patients with OL and LP was performed by review of dental and medical charts. And H/E slides were examined under the light microscope. we examined H/E slides by the light microscope. The follow up study of patients was performed. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS/PC WINDOWS (version 13.0). Results : The age distribution of OL was in the range of 13-75 years old being most prevalent in the 5th decade and there was a tendency of male prevalent. The age distribution of LP was in the range of 20-79 years old being most prevalent in the 4th decade and there was a tendency of female prevalent. The most common site of involvement was the buccal mucosa in both diseases. The most common clinical features of OL and LP were white plaque type and white lesion with striae, respectively. In case of LP, the most common clinical sign was tenderness to palpation. Fifteen cases of OL and eight cases of LP showed epithelial dysplasia. Twelve cases of OL recurred after surgery of oral squamous cell carcinoma and 2 cases of LP were transformed into oral squamous carcinoma. Conclusion : There was statistically significant difference in age, sex, clinical signs of patients, frequency of epithelial dysplasia between OL and LP. The Pearson coefficient correlation efficient was 0.51(p < 0.05). The knowledge of the difference between OL and LP can help understand these diseases.

  • PDF