• 중국학논총
• /
• no.61
• /
• pp.341-363
• /
• 2019

作者在本文中主要探讨了李泽厚的"西体中用"论所具有的政治思想含义以及支撑它的"度"本体论的技术哲学意义. "西体中用"论在政治思想上主要反对教条主义的马克思列宁主义和儒学复兴论, 他认为现代化基本上是西化, 在这一点上, 更接近于全盘西化论. 但他又认为马克思主义與儒学在现代化的历程中可以发挥出积极的作用, 这一点则与全盘西化论不同. 论"西体"时, 李澤厚强调合乎大工业生产的生产力與科技. 论"中用"时, 他认为生活方式的现代化可以消除过去社会主义社会和儒家文化的不合理因素, 但還认为我們可以用马克思主义和儒学中的合理思想来克服现代社会的各种弊病. 另外, 2000年以后, 李澤厚還提出了"度"本体論. 論它時, 一方面他强调工商性劳动, 为人服务的技术, 数学, 逻辑, 理性等. 这是"西体"论的基础. 另一方面, 他把传统中庸概念重新解为工业技术使用恰当, 却批評现代大工业技术不是"恰到好處"的技术. 这是"中用论"的哲学基础. 总之, "西体中用"论揭示了中国现代化的正确方向, "度"本体论在技术哲学上也较好地支持了這一社会理论. 可惜的是, 他未能找到现代社会的种种弊病产生的"体"上的原因, 因此也未能探索新的"体".

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.130
• /
• pp.1-22
• /
• 2014

Li Zehou(李澤厚) regards Chuang-tzu's fatalism as a kind of pessimism and slavish conformism. The main issue of this paper is to opposes Li Zehou(李澤厚)'s view, and reveal that Chuang-tzu's fatalism is not the negative and slavish conformism but the true positivism of the fate. These Chuang-tzu's fatalism can be conceptualized as a 安之若命. When the human was faced with unavoidable fate, Chuang-tzu's 安之若命 is not pessimistically surrender itself to the fate such as a slave, but pleasantly accepts and affirms the fate. Now, the next three process proves that Chuang-tzu's 安之若命 affirms the fate.The attitude of 安之若命, First, takes the unavoidable(不得已) fate as it is. Second, it resolves a humane 'sadness and joy(哀樂)' through 'the forgetting(忘).' Third, it understands the life and death, the change of world, the human body as the stream of energy(氣). Fourth, in conclusion, it affirms the fate by these processes. These point of view can conceptualize as Chuang-tzu's Amor Fati. That is to say, Chuang-tzu' 安之若命 is not a pessimistic but a positive view of the fate.