• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.117-131
• /
• 2001

The character of the educational tradition of Germany could be divided into two aspects. One is the humanistic liberal tendency and the other is vocational. From the beginning of the Twentieth Century, however, there has been an attempt to unify these two trends by the . Georg Kerschensteiner is the first of importance to make some comprehensive curriculum for this goal. In Kerschensteiner, the genuine education makes the individual assume his work and role in society, and to develop them by cultivating insight, will and power. His view is well expressed in the slogn "The vocational education is the beginning of the humanistic education." His goal is to make men of independence and autonomy through vocational education. The theory of Kerschensteiner's education is called 'general vocational education'. The reason why is that his vocational education concerns not just technical training for industry, but also general liberal arts. In this point, Kerschensteiner's point of view goes back to Wilhelm von Humboldt, neo-humanist afar in the first half of the Ninteenth Century, and to John Dewey, pragmatist in the contemporary age of Kerschensteiner. Kerschensteiner was much influenced by Humboldt's concepts of power and individuality. These concepts came to be embodied as a principle of vocational education in Kerschensteiner. Furthermore, Humboldt's concept of power could be associated with Dewey's theory of reflexive thinking. The power in Humboldt is to create spirit, which is connected with the world outside through language. The reflexive thinking of Dewey is a process that examines and selects some alternative thinking in the consciousness before acting. This process makes one find the method of problem-solving which results in behaviour. That is the experimental spirit or pragmatic behaviourism. These theories are reduced to the concept of 'work' in Kerschensteiner. And Kerschensteiner's theory of education that has both sides, humanistic and vocational, is similar to that of John Dewey. Dewey brings forward the idea that the vocational education is the best way to cultivate intelligence and emotion, as intelligence operates best in the life. The position of Dewey is in accord with that of Kerschensteiner who intends to cover experiences of various fields of society through practice-learning, and to have knowledge got from outside of school, refuting the misled trend of education isolated from real life. However, there is some difference between Kerschensteiner and Humbolt or Dewey. While the Neo-humanism of Humbolt and the pragmatic education of Dewey put emphasis rather on the liberal arts and culture of individuality, Kerschensteiner is concerned more with the work and life of the reality of society as a group. Kerschensteiner's concept of utility is related to education for the whole man and to the work of the individual and the nation as well as the will and power to practice it. The ideal man of utility of Kerschensteiner is to learn perfectly the value and behaviour of society through vocational life and to have right view of the state establishing a sound mutual relation between individual and state. Kerschensteiner is regarded as a devotee of 'the state of harmony' or 'the ideal of the state', as he makes the state as the criterion for defining the role of the individual. It can be said that Kerschensteiner is not a democrat of the American style as Dewey is, as he makes much of the value of the nation and state. However, he is a humanist and democrat in the point of vocational education. His purpose of education is to make whole men through work and vocational education.

• 한국심리학회지:학교
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.231-263
• /
• 2019

본 연구의 목적은 사회인지동기모형을 기반하여 개발한 대학생의 성장지향성 증진 그룹코칭 프로그램을 실시하여 성장지향성, 삶의 만족도, 지각된 스트레스, 긍정심리자본, 대인관계 변인에 대한 효과성을 검증하는데 있다. 본 프로그램은 성장지향에 유용한 성장지향성, 마인드셋과 뇌의 가소성, 자기 주도적 목표설정, 재능은 지속적 노력의 산물, 실패태도와 관점 변화, 긍정적 정서·사고 및 행동, 타인 이해, 성장지향 가치와 셀프코칭의 8가지 주제이고, 1회 120분씩 총 8회기로 구성하였으며, 3명의 대학생을 대상으로 예비프로그램을 실시한 후, 전문가의 평가와 참여자의 피드백 등을 토대로 일부 프로그램을 수정하였다. 본 프로그램 효과를 검증하기 위해 자율적으로 신청한 대학생 48명을 16명 실험집단, 16명 비교집단, 16명 통제집단으로 배치한 후, 실험집단은 성장지향성 증진 그룹코칭 프로그램을 실시하였고, 비교집단은 암묵증진이론에 기반한 학습목표지향성 향상 프로그램을 실시하였으며, 통제집단은 어떤 프로그램도 실시하지 않았다. 세 집단을 대상으로 프로그램 실시 전·후, 프로그램 종료 후 1개월·3개월 후의 시점에서 성장지향성, 삶의 만족도, 지각된 스트레스, 긍정심리자본, 대인관계를 측정하였다. 자료 분석은 세 집단이 동질 집단인지를 조사한 후, 시점과 집단에 대한 변량분석으로 상호작용효과를 측정하였다. 분석 결과, 성장지향성 증진 그룹코칭이 성장지향성, 삶의 만족도, 지각된 스트레스, 긍정심리자본, 대인관계에서 통계적으로 유의미하여 효과가 있었고 효과크기가 커서 비교 프로그램보다 더 효과가 있음이 확인되었다. 또한 프로그램 종료 후에도 코칭의 효과는 통계적으로 유의미하게 지속되었고, 효과크기가 커서 비교 프로그램 보다 더 효과적으로 지속됨을 확인하였다. 이 연구 결과를 토대로 본 연구는 성장지향성 증진 그룹코칭을 통해 대학생의 성장지향성, 삶의 만족도, 긍정심리자본, 대인관계 능력을 높이고 스트레스를 감소시키는 효과를 과학적 방법으로 검증하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.