• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 1987

LRFD 설계형식의 개별안전계수를 확률이론에 의하여 구할 때 주로 AFOSM 방법이 이용되어 왔다. 그러나 이 방법에 의해 구한 하중 및 저항계수를 사용하면 결과적인 신뢰성지수는 목표 신뢰성지수와 다를 수 있다. 최근 Ayyub 등이 제안한 Reliability-Conditioned(RC) 방법은 목표 신뢰성지수에 부합하지만 계산의 신속성 및 일관적 체계를 유지할 수 없다. 본 연구에서 제안한 RC/AFOSM 조합방법을 이용하면 계산의 체계가 일관적이고, 다양한 설계조건에 대하여 거의 일정한 개별안전계수를 결정할 수 있으며 이로부터 결과되는 신뢰성지수도 목표 신뢰성지수에 매우 근접하다.

• Steel and Composite Structures
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.295-308
• /
• 2012

This paper experimentally investigated the buckling capacity of built-up steel columns mainly, Cruciform Columns (CC) and Side-to-Side (SS) columns fabricated from two Universal Beam (UB) sections. A series of nine experimental tests comprised of three UB sections, three CC sections and three SS sections with different lengths were tested to failure to measure the ultimate axial capacity of each column section. The lengths used for each category of columns were 1.8, 2.0, and 2.2 m with slenderness ratios ranging from 39-105. The measured buckling loads of the tested specimens were compared with the predicted ultimate axial capacity using Eurocode 3, AISC LRFD, and BS 5959-1. It was observed that the failure modes of the specimens included flexural buckling, local buckling and flexural-torsional buckling. The results showed that the ultimate axial capacity of the tested cruciform and side-by-side columns were higher than the code predicted design values by up to 20%, with AISC LRFD design values being the least conservative and the Eurocode 3 design values being the most conservative. This study has concluded that cruciform column and side-to-side welded flange columns using universal beam sections are efficient built-up sections that have larger ultimate axial load capacity, larger stiffness with saving in the weight of steel used compared to its equivalent universal beam counterpart.

• Computers and Concrete
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.303-311
• /
• 2019

The depth of superstructure is the summation of the height of girders and the thickness of the deck floor. In this study, it is aim to determine the maximum span length of girders and minimum depth of the superstructure of prestressed concrete I-girder bridge. For this purpose the superstructure of the bridge with the width of 10m and the thickness of the deck floor of 0.175m, which the girders length was changed by two meter increments between 15m and 35m, was taken into account. Twelve different girders with heights of 60, 75, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170 and 180 cm, which are frequently used in Turkey, were chosen as girder type. The analyses of the superstructure of prestressed concrete I girder bridge was conducted with I-CAD software. In the analyses AASHTO LRFD (2012) conditions were taken into account a great extent. The dead loads of the structural and non-structural elements forming the bridge superstructure, prestressing force, standard truck load, equivalent lane load and pedestrian load were taken into consideration. HL93, design truck of AASHTO and also H30S24 design truck of Turkish Code were selected as vehicular live load. The allowable concrete stress limit, the number of prestressed strands, the number of debonded strands and the deflection parameters obtained from analyses were compared with the limit values found in AASHTO LRFD (2012) to determine the suitability of the girders. At the end of the study maximum span length of girders and equation using for calculation for minimum depth of the superstructure of prestressed concrete I-girder bridge were proposed.

• 한국강구조학회 논문집
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.643-653
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 일반 강재로 제작된 수평보강재가 설치된 플레이트 거더에 대한 3차원 비선형 유한요소해석을 수행하여 휨에 대한 극한 거동과 연성에 대해 고찰하였다. AASHTO LRFD (2002)의 규정에 의하면 수평보강재가 설치된 플레이트 거더는 조밀단면 검토에서 제외되어 비조밀단면으로 간주되는데, 소성모멘트 구현과 휨연성 조건 등을 엄밀히 검토하여 조밀단면으로 설계될 수 있는 가능성에 대하여 살펴보았다. 복부판의 세장비, 수평보강재의 강성, 압축플랜지의 세장비 등을 주요 변수로 설정하여 다양한 조합에 대한 해석을 수행하였다. 복부판에 설치된 보강재의 강성이 보장된 상태에서 복부판 압축 패널의 국부좌굴을 방지하기 위한 세장비의 값을 제한함으로써 수평보강재가 설치된 플레이트거더일지라도 조밀단면의 조건이 충분히 만족될 수 있다는 것이 확인되었다. 해석 결과에 근거하여 수평보강재가 설치된 플레이트거더가 조밀단면으로 설계되기 위한 조건식이 제안되었다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 1999년도 말뚝기초위원회 워크샵
• /
• pp.35-52
• /
• 1999

This paper addresses on new codes of practice, limit state design; load resistance factored design and Eurocode 7, which have recently been adopted by foundation engineers in North America and European Communities. A brief description of the limit state design concepts and some introductions to Australia and Sweden national code for pile foundation are made on behalf of pile capacity determination. Also, simple closed form solution for rational resistance factor when resistance is log-normally distributed, has been derived for pile foundation.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제3권4호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 1983

본(本) 연구(硏究)는 나선(螺旋)기둥의 신뢰성(信賴性) 설계규준(設計規準)을 고찰(考察)하고, Ellingwood가 제안(提案)한 신뢰성(信賴性) 해석(解析)과 신뢰성(信賴性) 설계규준(設計規準) 산정(算定) 알고리즘으로부터 실용적(實用的)인 알고리즘을 유도(誘導)하였다. Cornell의 MFOSM 이론(理論)에 의해 나선(螺旋)기둥의 불확실량(不確實量) 산정(算定)알고리즘을 유도(誘導)하여 저항(抵抗)의 불확실량(不確實量)을 산정(算定)했으며, 하중(荷重)의 불확실량(不確實量)은 우리의 실정(實情)을 고려한 적절한 값을 택(擇)하여 신뢰성(信賴性) 해석(解析) 및 신뢰성(信賴性) 설계규준(設計規準)을 산정(算定)했다. 현행(現行) WSD와 USD 설계법(設計法)의 신뢰성(信賴性) 수준(水準)을 분석(分析)하고 외국(外國)의 경우와 비교(比較) 검토(檢討)함으로써, 우리 실정(實情)에 적당한 목표신뢰성지수(目標信賴性指數) ${\beta}_0=3.5$를 택(擇)하여 LRFD 설계규준(設計規準)에 의한 하중일저항계수(荷重一抵抗係數)를 제안(提案)했으며, 신뢰성설계(信賴性設計)와 비슷한 신뢰성(信賴性)을 갖는 WSD의 철근(鐵筋)과 콘크리트의 허용응력(許容應力)을 산정(算定) 제안(提案)했다. 본(本) 연구(硏究)에서 제안(提案)한 신뢰성(信賴性) 설계규준(設計規準) 및 허용응력(許容應力)은 일정(一定)한 신뢰성(信賴性)을 주는 보다 합리적(合理的)인 설계(設計)가 됨을 알 수 있었다.

• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.613-625
• /
• 2003

This paper presents the lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) of beams or girders with continuous lateral support at top flange. Traditional moment gradient factors ($C_b$) given by AISC in LRFD Specification for Structural Steel Buildings and by AASHTO in LRFD Bridge Design Specifications were reviewed. Finite-element method buckling analyses of doubly symmetric I-shaped beams with continuous top bracing were conducted to develop new moment gradient factors. A uniformly distributed load was applied at midheight and either or both end moments were applied at the ends of beams. The proposed solutions are simple and accurate for use by engineers to determine the LTB resistance of beams.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2008년도 추계 학술발표회
• /
• pp.779-783
• /
• 2008

LRFD Resistance factors for static bearing capacity of driven steel pipe piles were calibrated in the freamework of reliability theory. Reliability analysis was performed by the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) using resistance bias factor statistics.The target reliability indices are selected as 2.0 and 2.33 for group pile case and 2.5 for single pile case, based on the reliability level of the current design practice and considering redundancy of pile group, acceptable risk level, construction quality control, and significance of individual structure.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2006년도 춘계학술발표회 논문집(I)
• /
• pp.294-297
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to introduce design practice for prestressed concrete box girder with AASHTO LRFD Design Specification. Distinctive features of viaduct girder of Incheon Bridge are pre-tensioned transverse tendon, 3-dim. transverse analysis, enlarged opening in diaphragm and so on.

• Structural Monitoring and Maintenance
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.207-220
• /
• 2023

The safety of bridges are critical in our transportation infrastructure. Bridge design and analysis require complex structural analysis procedures to ensure their safety and stability. One common method is to calculate the maximum moment in the girders to determine the appropriate bridge section. Girder distribution factors (GDFs) provide a simpler approach for performing this analysis. A GDF is a ratio between the response of a single girder and the total response of all girders in the bridge. This paper explores the significance of GDFs in bridge analysis and design, including their importance in the evaluation of existing bridges. We utilized Bridge Weigh-in-motion (B-WIM) measurements of five simple supported girder bridge in Indonesia to develop a simple GDF provisions for the Indonesia's bridge design code. The B-WIM measurements enable us to know each girder strain as a response due to vehicle loading as the vehicle passes the bridge. The calculated GDF obtained from the B-WIM measurements were compared with the code-specified GDF and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) bridge design specification. Our study found that the code specified GDF was adequate or conservative compared to the GDF obtained from the B-WIM measurements. The proposed GDF equation correlates well with the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specification. Developing appropriate provisions for GDFs in Indonesian bridge design codes can provides a practical solution for designing girder bridges in Indonesia, ensuring safety while allowing for easier calculations and assessments based on B-WIM measurements.