• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.43-64
• /
• 2008

Kyeongbokgung succeeded in regaining its status as a royal palace after the reconstruction that began in the second year of King Gojong(1865) only to have most of its buildings taken down in the early 20th century. Fortunately, however, there is the Pukkwoldohyong(Map of North Palace), which drew out each of the buildings of Kyeongbokgung and their arrangement in details in 1907 when the royal palace lost its original appearance. And there is another plot plan of the royal palace at the Korea University Museum, which labeled it Kyeongbokgung-Baechido(Planning Map of Kyeongbokgung Palace). The map presents almost the same plan as Pukkwoldohyong in terms of making and expressive methods, being estimated to have been made in 1888 since its building arrangement doesn't show the changes made after 1890. The map also offers more information about the uses of each building than Pukkwoldohyong and matches the excavation results of the relics. Kyeongbokgung-Jeondo(Map of Kyeongbokgung Palace), which is recorded to be made during the reconstruction of the palace in the early years of King Gojong in historical materials, describes the shapes and arrangements of the buildings in a concrete and realistic fashion. The Kyeongbokgung-Baechido seems to be one of the plans made in the process of restoring and repairing buildings that were lost or destroyed in fire. The Kyeongbokgung-Baschido has the following historic values; 1) it provides dues to estimate the early state of the palace after the reconstruction during the reign of King Gojong. In fact the Sujeongjeon and Heungbokjeon show the early state of the reconstruction; 2) it contains data with which to understand the changes to the palace after 1890, around which they added Hamhwadang and Jibokjae; and 3) it offers information about the uses of the palace's buildings from 1885 to 1880 with its descriptions of the building purposes and relationships regarding the life in the palace.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.459-471
• /
• 2013

본 연구의 목적은 고궁관광지의 만족도를 측정하기 위하여 필요한 요인을 개발하는데 있다. Frochot & Hughes는 2000년 처음으로 문화유산관광지의 만족도 측정방법인 HISTOQUAL을 개발하였다. 본 연구는 발전된 HISTOQUAL에 전문성 요소를 추가하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 실증연구를 위한 모집단은 서울 경복궁에서 이루어졌으며 504부를 표본으로 하였다. 만족도에 미치는 영향을 검증한 결과 관광지 서비스의 품질이 만족도에 미치는 영향은 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 또한 만족도는 재방문 및 추천의도에 미치는 영향도 모두 유의한 것으로 나타났다.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2018

Gojong(高宗) had experienced extravagant change during a period of reign and he was located in the center of the change. He was the king who also experienced various changes in construction and accomplished a large number of construction activities aggressively. Gojong could acquire the information and details about anarchitecture, through the experience of a lot of large-scale construction activities in a regency period of Heungseon-Daewongun(興宣大院君). After opening of a port, as the western culture and technology was flowed in Korea, the knowledge of western architecture also was introduced. Gwanmungak(觀文閣) was constructed in Kyeongbokgung Palace under that influence in 1888, but the construction was not successfully finished. Due to the failure of Gwanmungak, Gojong no more constructed a western architecture until 1897. He was aware of the merits of western architectures while living in the western architecture during Agwanpacheon(俄館播遷). And he led a lot of constructions of the western architectures in Kyeongungung(慶運宮). It is possible to arrange in two reasons about the interest in an architecture of Gojong. Firstly, Gojong was individually interested in the architectures, and he constantly accomplished constructions of new buildings from childhood. And secondly, Gojong thought that western architecture has an advantage in the international situations. He held out the tendencies to construct the western architectures with excessive investments.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.45-56
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 덕수궁을 대한제국시기 전후를 기점으로 현재의 시민 중심의 공공성을 지향하는 '공원'의 성격을 띠는 장소로 변화하기까지 주체의 변화와 장소독해자의 해석에 따라 그 장소적 맥락과 장소성이 어떻게 변화해 왔는지를 살펴보고자 한 시도이다. 결론적으로 덕수궁은 수난과 비애의 장소이기도 했지만, 희망을 잃지 않고 꾸준히 출구를 모색한 재기의 장소였다. 덕수궁은 임진왜란이나 청일전쟁과 같은 조선 왕조의 변란 때마다 군주가 잠시 이곳에 머물며 난리를 극복한 중요한 역사의 무대였으며, 더욱 중요하게는 한국사상 최초의 황제국인 대한제국의 시련과 희망이 교차한 황궁이었다. 이와 더불어 현재의 덕수궁은 경복궁이나 창덕궁과 달리 영역 자체가 임진왜란 이후부터 현재에 이르기까지 시시각각 변해왔고 덕수궁 주변과의 끊임없이 영역이 변하면서 시대적 상황을 잘 표현해 주고 있는 현재의 덕수궁의 외관으로 드러나는 모습보다도 훨씬 더 다양한 장소성이 혼재된 곳이다. 때문에 최근에 논의되기 시작한 덕수궁 복원 사업은 다른 어떤 궁들의 복원보다도 어려운 작업이며 정치적 이권을 넘어서 신중히 고려되어야 할 사항이다.