• 연구윤리
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.21-24
• /
• 2021

Purpose: This paper aims to evaluate and reinstate preventative guidelines necessary for a sound academic journal (or academic conference) for the articles published by KODISA and its branch journals. As questionable or predatory academic journals and academic conferences are rapidly increasing, preemptively establishing preventative standards have become essential to obviate questionable academic activities. Research design, data and methodology: This is an analytical study that explores and examines research, publication ethics, and misconducts. For this purpose, research ethics related data in overseas and domestic academic journals have been examined and analyzed. Results: The issues identified from this research are as follows: enhancing the expertise of editor-inchief (no concurrent jobs for major and non-major area); clarifying the index; complying with the review policy (The review policy should be publicly announced); complying with anonymous review process; complying with 3 peer-review policy, complying with the publication policy as per field of study; avoiding conference hosting at holiday resorts unless unavoidable; complying with the planned programs and cancelling events if not feasible; following proper review standards and management for all journals, including the journals publishing large number of articles (all materials should be prepared in case explanatory data is required); complying with the marketing policy standards; complying with the impact factor; excluding personal solicitation; and complying with the general policy. Conclusions: Questionable and predatory academic activities by academic organizations and journals will continue, and it is the responsibility of the individual scholars to identify and reject these types of dubious academic activities. This study provides standards to prevent the possibility of questionable academic activities that have been conducted in the past. The analysis and findings will strengthen the continued efforts of KODISA as it strives to be a transparent, ethical, and professional academic association, and the association will continue to foster an academic environment that is well-respected by scholars and practitioners throughout the world.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.49-52
• /
• 2017

Purpose - To improve and strengthen existing publication and research ethics, KODISA has identified and presented various cases which have violated publication and research ethics and principles in recent years. The editorial office of KODISA has been providing and continues to provide advice and feedback on publication ethics to researchers during peer review and editorial decision making process. Providing advice and feedback on publication ethics will ensure researchers to have an opportunity to correct their mistakes or make appropriate decisions and avoid any violations in research ethics. The purpose of this paper is to identify different cases of ethical violation in research and inform and educate researchers to avoid any violations in publication and research ethics. Furthermore, this article will demonstrate how KODISA journals identify and penalize ethical violations and strengthens its publication ethics and practices. Research design, data and methodology - This paper examines different types of ethical violation in publication and research ethics. The paper identifies and analyzes all ethical violations in research and combines them into five general categories. Those five general types of ethical violations are thoroughly examined and discussed. Results - Ethical violations of research occur in various forms at regular intervals; in other words, unethical researchers tend to commit different types of ethical violations repeatedly at same time. The five categories of ethical violation in research are as follows: (1) Arbitrary changes or additions in author(s) happen frequently in thesis/dissertation related publications. (2) Self plagiarism, submitting same work or mixture of previous works with or without using proper citations, also occurs frequently, but the most common type of plagiarism is changing the statistical results and using them to present as the results of the empirical analysis; (3) Translation plagiarism, another ethical violation in publication, is difficult to detect but occurs frequently; (4) Fabrication of data or statistical analysis also occurs frequently. KODISA requires authors to submit the results of the empirical analysis of the paper (the output of the statistical program) to prevent this type of ethical violation; (5) Mashup or aggregator plagiarism, submitting a mix of several different works with or without proper citations without alterations, is very difficult to detect, and KODISA journals consider this type of plagiarism as the worst ethical violation. Conclusions - There are some individual cases of ethical violation in research and publication that could not be included in the five categories presented throughout the paper. KODISA and its editorial office should continue to develop, revise, and strengthen their publication ethics, to learn and share different ways to detect any ethical violations in research and publication, to train and educate its editorial members and researchers, and to analyze and share different cases of ethical violations with the scholarly community.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.7-17
• /
• 2012

2014년도 12월말부터 시행하는 한국연구재단의 등재지 제도의 폐지는 한국 내에 존재하는 연구논문집 향방에 커다란 지각변동의 요인으로 작용할 것으로 예상되고 있다. 이러한 상황은 한국유통과학회에서 발행하는 유통과학연구를 비롯한 3개의 연구논문집에게는 커다란 기회로 작용할 것이며, 이번 기회를 잘 활용한다면 조속한 성장과 발전을 도모할 수 있을 것이다. 한국유통과학회에서 발행하는 유통과학연구는 1999년을 시작으로 꾸준한 발전을 유지하여 왔고, 초창기 연 2회 발행하던 체제를 개편하여, 연 4회를 발행 하다가, 2012년에는 연 12회 발행하는 사회과학분야에서 가장 선두로 나가는 연구논문집으로 성장했다. 2011년 7월에는 전면 영문으로 홈페이지를 개편하여, 지속적으로 게재논문을 무료로 열람토록 하였고, 그 결과 2012년 들어서서 해외에서 접속하여 유통과학연구 홈페이지를 열람하는 이용자의 숫자가 급속히 증가하였다. 더욱이 최근 들어서서는 해외석학들의 논문 투고가 꾸준한 증가 추세에 있다. 예를 들어서, 2012년 3월에는 종전과 달리 해외석학들의 투고논문이 4편에 이를 정도로 학회의 지명도가 높아지고 있다. 이러한 상황은 본 유통과학연구가 한국내에서의 지명도보다 외국에서의 지명도가 높아지고 있다는 점을 의미하는 것이다. 그러나, 현시점에서 반추할 때, 이러한 발전은 현재로서는 긍정적인 요인으로 작용될 수는 있으나, 학회운영및 연구논문집의 지속적인 상태점검과 특성에 맞는 전략도출 및 실행이 없는 한 미래의 경쟁력을 기약할 수 없는 불투명한 환경에 처해 있다는 점을 인지해야 한다. 따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 한국유통과학회에서 발행하는 유통과학연구가 국내외 위상을 높이고 해외에서 유명저널이 되기 위해서는 당면과제와 문제점을 찾아내고 효율적이고 실용적인 여러가지 해결 대안을 모색 제시하고자 함에 있다. 즉, 본 연구는 한국유통과학회의 연구논문집인 유통과학연구의 과거, 현재, 그리고 미래에 대하여 논하고, 학회운영과 관련하여 편집관리 및 시스템운영을 전반적으로 점검하여 문제점과 해결점을 모색하고 제시하였다.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.5-10
• /
• 2016

Purpose - The purpose of this research is to suggest researchers to know the standards of research ethics violation and eliminate the researchers' anxiety for the possible cases in violation of research ethics through the notification on the web site with online paper submission system for over the last year. We have made an effort and achieved the most exemplary and leading position in the academic journals, however, not satisfied with this, we will endeavor to strengthen it. Research design, data and methodology - Plagiarism and overlapping publications are the most serious problems in research ethics. Therefore, it is necessary to verify the submitted articles making use of paper similarity test programs such as copy killer, KCI test, etc. Editorial board and reviewers should present clear evidences and notify contributors on research ethics violation after close review the contributors' article content. Results - This research focused on the submitted articles which were verified as research ethics violation, and categorized them into 7 cases. Conclusions - With analyzing the verified 7 cases from KODISA journals, this research will examine closely the verification system and regulations in the current academic research ethics. Afterwards, this research will seek for solution to the problems and make an effort to get improvement for them.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.5-8
• /
• 2015

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review, analyze, and learn from the most recent cases of plagiarism and to identify and promote ethical practices in research and publication. Research design, data, and methodology - This is a case study, an analytical approach, which focuses on analyzing the most recent cases of plagiarism to identify ethical issues and concerns in journal publication practices. Results - Despite the availability of many software and web-based applications and programs to detect plagiarism, there is no universal or perfect plagiarism detection application available to ease the editorial responsibility. Lack of understanding the concept and ignorance of plagiarism were the main reasons for the cases of plagiarism. Conclusions - Some of the plagiarism cases reveal a lack of knowledge in proper application of in-text citations and references, including quoting, requiting, paraphrasing, and citing sources, etc. Furthermore, the need for recognizing and considering the distorted and falsified primary and secondary research data as plagiarism is essential to enhance ethical practices in journal publication.

• 연구윤리
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.23-28
• /
• 2020

Purpose: Focusing on Supreme Court precedents, we intend to establish criteria for judging research misconduct. Research design, data and methodology: In addition, I would like to propose the criteria for judging research misconduct by the KODISA, which applies the court's standards well in practice, and guidelines for preventing research misconduct. Research design, data and methodology: After classifying the case of research misconduct into six cases, the court's judgment and practical application will be reviewed. Results: First, research misconduct that has passed the disciplinary prescription can be punished. This is because the state of illegality continues to this day. Second, even if there were no punishment regulations at the time of research misconduct, it can be retroactively punished with the current punishment regulations. This is because research ethics is a universal and common standard and does not change. Third, if there is a fact that infringes on intellectual property rights, it is presumed unwritten intentions. Therefore, the act of taking and using the work of another person without permission or proper citation procedure, even if it is unintentional and for the public interest, is a research misconduct. Fourth, if there is an inappropriate citation notation, the intention of research misconduct is presumed. It is the judgment of the court that even if a quotation is marked, if it is incomplete, it is recognized as plagiarism. Fifth, if the author uses the work of another person without proper source indication, it is plagiarism even if the other person who owns the copyright agrees to it. The understanding or consent of some parties does not justify research misconduct in violation of public trust. Sixth, it is a research misconduct to create a new work without citations for one's previous work. In addition, even if there is a citation, if the subsequent writing is not original, it is a research misconduct. Conclusions: Academia should clarify the scope of research misconduct by referring to the Research Ethics Regulations of KODISA, and deal with research results that lack the value as creative works similar to those of research misconduct.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.59-69
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide information for other journals as well as the continuous development of distribution science research by confirming the globalization performance of the Journal of Distribution Science (JDS), the main journal of KODISA. Research Design, Data, and Methodology: A total of 863 papers published in JDS from 2011 to 2021 searched by scienceON were divided into 4 periods and analyzed under the headings of submission system, standardity, collaboration, and degree of achievement of publication goals. SPSS 24.0 and R 4.1.1 package were used to perform the publication frequency analysis, crosstab-analysis, keyword frequency analysis, and LDA topic modeling were performed. In addition, trend analysis with weight applied to each word was performed. Results: It was found that the ratio of English-written papers, which is the indicator of a journal's starndardity, is continuously increasing, and the ratio of overseas authors, which is the indicator of collaboration, is also continuously increasing. It was confirmed through keyword trend analysis by period and LDA topic modeling results - which were weighted to confirm the degree of achievement of the journal's publication goal - that the articles published by the journal has been in agreement with monthly research topic proposed by JDS. Conclusion: By examining the five criteria for globalization, it can be concluded that JDS's efforts for globalization are achieving significant results and providing effective directions for other academic journals. However, in order for JDS to become a top academic journal, it was suggested that efforts should be made to establish a system for collaborative research by domestic and foreign authors, as well as to provide a clear definition for the monthly research topics and classification of sub-topics.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.5-15
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 한국유통과학회가 발행하고 있는 유통과학연구에 게재된 논문의 연구 동향을 분석하고 학회지의 질적 향상을 위한 시사점을 제시하고자 하였다. 즉, 유통분야의 학문체계를 분류하여 연구동향을 분석하고, 유통 관련 다른 학회지와 비교한 후 유통과학연구의 질적 향상을 위한 시사점을 도출하고자 하였다. 특히, 한국유통과학회는 1999년 「유통과학연구」 제1권 제1호 창간을 시작으로 2010년 9월 제8권 제3호까지 총 109편의 논문을 게재하였다. 109편의 논문을 대상으로 연구주제, 연구 주체, 연구 참여자의 수, 연구방법론, 국문 및 영문논문 빈도, 내국인 및 외국인 참여빈도, 참고문헌 활용 등에 대하여 분석하였다. 추가적으로 유통을 연구대상으로 하는 한국유통학회의 유통연구 및 한국유통경영학회의 유통경영학회지와 유통과학연구를 비교 분석하여 발전방안을 모색하고자 한다. 결론적으로 유통과학연구의 연구동향 및 유사 학회지의 비교 분석을 바탕으로 다음과 같은 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. 먼저, 유통과학연구가 SSCI를 준비하기 위해서는 해외 투고자를 적극 유치해야한다. 또한, 영문논문의 비중을 대폭 늘려야 할 것이다. 셋째, 학술지의 질 향상을 위한 다양한 연구방법론 수용을 해야할 것이다. 넷째, 유통과학연구의 피인용율울 확대하기 위하여 학술지의 해외 공급을 원활하게 할 수 있도록 구글 등 웹검색 기능을 보강해야 할 것이다. 이상의 시사점을 통한 개선을 한다면 국내 뿐 아니라 해외에서도 인정받는 세계적인 학술지 반열에 올라설 수 있을 것이다.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제10권8호
• /
• pp.17-24
• /
• 2019

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to find out research directions for distribution and fusion and complex field to many domestic and foreign researchers carrying out related academic research by confirming research trends in the Journal of Distribution Science (JDS). Research Design, Data, and Methodology - To do this, I used keywords from a total of 904 papers published in the JDS excluding 19 papers that were not presented with keywords among 923. The analysis utilized word clouding, topic modeling, and weighted frequency analysis using the R program. Results - As a result of word clouding analysis, customer satisfaction was the most utilized keyword. Topic modeling results were divided into ten topics such as distribution channels, communication, supply chain, brand, business, customer, comparative study, performance, KODISA journal, and trade. It is confirmed that only the service quality part is increased in the weighted frequency analysis result of applying to the year group. Conclusion - The results of this study confirm that the JDS has developed into various convergence and integration researches from the past studies limited to the field of distribution. However, JDS's identity is based on distribution. Therefore, it is also necessary to establish identity continuously through special editions of fields related to distribution.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.7-12
• /
• 2019

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status of various fusion research journals and its operational strategies, comparing them to those of IJIDB. Research design, data, and methodology - This study focused on the content analysis and strategies of operations for other convergence journals, comparing them to IJIDB in terms of the number of publication journals, publications, academic scope, and the impact factor. Results - IJIDB is relatively new and in its developmental stages compared to other convergence journals. But, IJIDB also shows much promise in that it came second in the field of economic publications of 54 journals in 2017. In order to To elevate IJIDB journal to the top in Korea Citation Index Journals, KODISA should host more international conferences to increase its international recognition levels, develop its managerial functions for increased stability, and open more opportunities for Candidates of Ph.D and Masters degree students to publish for fostering and building potential leaders and innovators. Conclusions - IJIDB is a newly born academic journal. In the future, IJIDB will be able to develop exponentially and be one of the leading journals in the Korea Citation Index by continually learning and developing its operational strategies.