• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.39 no.3
• /
• pp.221-226
• /
• 2009

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two alprazolam tablets, Xanax 0.25 mg (Pharmacia Korea Pharm. Co., Ltd.) and Zyren 0.25 mg (Kwang Dong Pharm. Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). The alprazolam release from two alprazolam tablets in vitro was tested using KP VIII Apparatus II method with various dissolution media (pH 1.2, 4.0, 6.8 buffer solutions and water). The dissolution profiles of two alprazolam tablets were very similar at all dissolution media. Twenty four healthy male volunteers were divided into two groups with a randomized 2${\times}$2 cross-over study. After four tablets (1 mg alprazolam) were orally administrated, blood was taken and the concentrations of alprazolam in serum were determined using LC/MS/MS. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t$, $C_max$ and $T_max$were determined. Our results showed that the differences in $AUC_t$, $C_max$ and $T_max$ between two alprazolam tablets based on the Xanax were -11.65%, -4.44% and -39.31%, respectively. There were no sequence effects between two tablets in these parameter. The 90% confidence intervals using logarithmically transformed data were within the acceptance range of log(0.8) to log(1.25)(e.g., log(0.8386)${\sim}$log(0.9453) and log(0.8596)${\sim}$log(1.1040) for $AUC_t$, $C_max$, respectively). Thus, Zyren 0.25 mg tablet was bioequivalent to Xanax 0.25 mg tablet.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.277-282
• /
• 2008

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two topiramate tablets, Topamax tablet (Janssen Korea. Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea, reference drug) and Topamin tablet (Myungmoon Pharm. Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea, test drug), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). Twenty-four healthy male Korean volunteers received one tablet at the dose of 100 mg topiramate in a $2{\times}2$ crossover study. There were two-weeks washout period between the doses. Plasma concentrations of topiramate were monitored by an LC-MS/MS for over a period of 96 hr after administration. $AUC_t$ (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 96 hr) was calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule method. $C_{max}$ (maximum plasma drug concentration) and $T_{max}$ (time to reach $C_{max}$) were compiled from the plasma concentration-time data. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$. The 90% confidence intervals of the $AUC_t$, ratio and the $C_{max}$ ratio for Topamin/Topamax were $\log0.88{\sim}\log1.02$ and $\log0.87{\sim}\log1.03$, respectively. These values were within the acceptable bioequivalence intervals of $\log0.80{\sim}\log1.25$. Taken together, our study demonstrated the bioequivalence of Topamax and Topamin with respect to the rate and extent of absorption.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.229-235
• /
• 2003

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two enalapril maleate tablets, $Renitec^{TM}$ (MSD Korea Ltd.) and $Enalace^{TM}$ (Welfide Korea Ltd.), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). Twenty-four normal male volunteers, $22.33{\pm}2.55$ year in age and $66.54{\pm}8.30$ kg in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized $2{\times}2$ cross-over study was employed. After two tablets containing 10 mg of enalapril maleate per tablet were orally administered, blood was taken at predetermined time intervals and concentrations of enalapril in plasma were determined using LC-MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t,\;C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ were calculated and ANOVA test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t,\;and\;C_{max}$ untransformed $T_{max}$. There were no sequence effects between two formulations in these parameters. The 90% confidence intervals for the log transformed data were acceptance range of log0.8 to log1.25$(e.g.,\;log1.02{\sim}log1.14\;and\;log1.03{\sim}log1.19\;for\;AUC_t\;and\;C_{max},\;respectively)$. The major parameters, $AUC_t,\;and\;C_{max}$, met the criteria of KDFA for bioequivalence indicating that $Enalace^{TM}$ tablet is bioequivalent to $Renitec^{TM}$ tablet.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.67-72
• /
• 1999

A bioequivalence study of the $Kerola^{\circledR}$ intramuscular injections (Dongkwang Pharmaceutical Co., Korea) to the $Tarasyn^{\circledR}$ intramuscular injections (Roche Co., Korea), formulations of ketorolac tromethamine (KTR), was conducted. Sixteen healthy Korean male subjects were received each formulation at the dose of 30 mg as KTR in a $2{\times}2$ crossover study. There was an one-week washout period between the doses. Plasma concentrations of KTR were monitored by a HPLC method. AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal method. $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were compiled from the plasma drug concentration-time data. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that there are no differences in AUC, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ between the formulations. The differences between the formulations in these parameters were all far less than 20% (i.e., 3.65, 2.59 and 4.35% for AUC, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ respectively). Minimum detectable differences (%) at ${\alpha}=0.1$ and $1-{\beta}=0.8$ were 12.87, 13.44, 20.62%, for AUC, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals for these parameters were also within 20%. These results satisfy the bioequivalence criteria of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) guidelines (No. 1998-86). Therefore, these results indicate that the two formulations of KTR are bioequivalent.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.34 no.1
• /
• pp.43-48
• /
• 2004

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two nizatidine capsules, Axid (Lilly Korea Pharm. Co., Ltd.) and Nex (Bi-nex Pharm. Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). The nizatidine release from the two nizatidine capsules in vitro was tested using KP Apparatus method with various dissolution media (pH 1.2, 4.0, 6.8 buffer solutions and water). The dissolution prefers of two nizatidine capsules were very similar at all dissolution media. Twenty four normal male volunteers were divided into two groups with a randomized 22 crossover study. After two capsules (300 mg nizatidine) were orally administrated, blood was taken and the concentrations of nizatidine in serum were determined using HPLC with UV detector. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were determined. The result showed that the differences in $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ between two nizatidine capsules based on the Axid were -6.16%, -8.26% and -1.82%, respectively. There were no sequence effects between two capsules in these parameter. The 90% confidence intervals using logarithmically transformed data were within the acceptance range of log(0.8) to log(125)(e.g., $log(0.91){\sim}log(0.97)$ and $log(0.85) {\sim}log(0.99)$ for $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$ respectively), indicting that Nex capsule is bioequivalent to Axid capsule.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.45-50
• /
• 2005

The purpose of the present study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of two ofloxacin tablets, Tarivid (Jeil Pharm. Co., Ltd.) and Favid (ILHWA Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). Twenty-four normal male volunteers, $23.67{\pm}3.12$ year in age and $68.50{\pm}7.23$ kg in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized $2{\times}2$ cross-over study was employed. After four tablets containing 100 mg of ofloxacin were orally administered, blood was taken at predetermined time intervals and concentrations of ofloxacin in plasma were determined using HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were calculated and ANOVA test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$ and untransformed $T_{max}$. There were no sequence effects between two formulations in these parameters. The 90% confidence intervals for the log transformed data were acceptance range of log 0.8 to log 1.25 (e.g., $log0.94{\sim}log1.04\;and\;log0.90{\sim}log1.07\;for\;AUC_t\;and\;C_{max}$, respectively). The major parameters, $AUC_t$, and $C_{max}$, met the criteria of KDFA for bioequivalence indicating that Favid tablet is bioequivalent to Tarivid tablet.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.187-192
• /
• 2005

The purpose of the present study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of two benidipine hydrochloride tablets, Codipine (Youngjin Pharm. Co., Ltd.) and Benipine (Myungmoon Pharm. Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). Twenty-four normal male volunteers, $23.00{\pm}1.82$ year in age and $70.08{\pm}9.59$ kg in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized $2{\times}2$ cross-over study was employed. After two tablets containing 4 mg of benidipine hydrochloride were orally administered, blood was taken at predetermined time intervals and concentrations of benidipine in plasma were determined using LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were calculated and ANOVA test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t$, and $C_{max}$. There were no sequence effects between two formulations in these parameters. The 90% confidence intervals for the log transformed data were acceptance range of log0.8 to log1.25 $(e.g., \;log1.04{\sim}log1.24\;and\;log0.91{\sim}log1.09$ for $AUC_t$, and $C_{max}$ respectively). The major parameters, $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$, met the criteria of KDFA for bioequivalence indicating that Benipine tablet is bioequivalent to Codipine tablet.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.35 no.4
• /
• pp.287-293
• /
• 2005

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two glimepiride tablets, Amaryl tablet (Handok & Aventis Korea, reference drug) and Mepiril tablet (Myungmoon Pharm. Co., Ltd., Korea, test drug), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). After adding an internal standard (glibenclamide) to human plasma, plasma samples were extracted using 1mL of methyl tertiary butyl ether. Compounds extracted were analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode analyte detection. This method for determination glimepiride proved accurate and reproducible, with a limit of quantitation of 2 ng/mL in human plasma. Twenty-four healthy male Korean volunteers received each medicine at the glimepiride dose of 2 mg in a $2{\times}2$ crossover study. There was a one-week washout period between the doses. Plasma concentrations of glimepiride were monitored by a LC-MS/MS for over a period of 12 hr after the administration. $AUC_t$ (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 12 hr) was calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule method. $C_{max}$ (maximum plasma drug concentration) and $T_{max}$ (time to reach $C_{max}$) were compiled from the plasma concentration-time data. Analysis of variance was carried out using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$. No significant sequence effect was found for all of the bioavailability parameters indicating that the crossover design was properly performed. The 90% confidence intervals of the $AUC_t$ ratio and the $C_{max}$ ratio for Amaryl/Mepiril were log 0.9583-log 1.1357 and log 1.0570-log 1.2376, respectively. These values were within the acceptable bioequivalence intervals of log 0.80-log 1.25. Taken together, our study demonstrated the bioequivalence of Amaryl and Mepiril with respect to the rate and extent of absorption.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.37 no.4
• /
• pp.249-254
• /
• 2007

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two baclofen tablets, $Baclan^{TM}$ tablet (Yooyoung Pharm. Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea, reference drug) and Taepyungyang Baclofen tablet (Pacificpharma Corporation, Seoul, Korea, test drug), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). Twenty-four healthy male Korean volunteers received three tablets containing baclofen 10 mg in a $2{\times}2$ crossover study. There was a one-week washout period between the doses. Plasma concentrations of baclofen were monitored for over a period of 24 hr after the administration by using an LC-MS/MS. $AUC_t,\;C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ were compiled from the plasma concentration-time data. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t\;and\;C_{max}$. The 90% confidence intervals of the $AUC_t$ and the $C_{max}$ for Taepyungyang $Baclofen/Baclan^{TM}$ were $log0.92{\sim}log1.06\;and\;log1.03{\sim}log1.22$, respectively. These values were within the acceptable bioequivalence intervals of $log0.80{\sim}log1.25$. It was concluded that Taepyungyang Baclofen tablet was bioequivalent to $Baclan^{TM}$ tablet, in terms of both rate and extent of absorption.

• Journal of Physiology & Pathology in Korean Medicine
• /
• v.23 no.5
• /
• pp.993-1002
• /
• 2009

The object of this study was to evaluate the single dose toxicity of Taeumjowui-tang(TUJWT), a polyherbal formula have been traditionally used as prevention or treatment agent for obesity, in male and female mice. Aqueous extracts of TUJWT (Yield = 10.5%) was administered to female and male ICR mice as an oral dose of 2000, 1000 and 500 mg/kg (body wt.) according to the recommendation of KFDA Guidelines. Animals were monitored for the mortality and changes in body weight, clinical signs and gross observation during 14 days after dosing, upon necropsy, organ weight and histopathology of 12 principle organs were examined. As results, we could not find any mortality, clinical signs, and changes in the body and organ weight except for diarrhea restricted in TUJWT 2000 mg/kg treated one male mouse at 1 day after administration, and increases of popliteal lymph node weights in all TUJWT administered groups. In addition, no TUJWT-treatment related abnormal gross findings and changes in histopathology of principle organs were detected except for increases of the frequency of hypertrophy and hyperplasia of lymphoid cells in the popliteal lymph nodes in all TUJWT treatment groups with some sporadic accidental findings. These increases of popliteal lymph node weights with hypertrophy and hyperplasia of lymphoid cells were considered that related to the immune modulate effect of TUJWT not toxicological signs. The results obtained in this study suggest that the TUJWT does not cause any toxicological signs. The 50% lethal dose and approximate lethal dose of TUJWT aqueous extracts in both female and male mice were considered as over 2000 mg/kg.