• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.141-146
• /
• 2002

KCR4판 초안의 제5장 '악보'부분에 대한 각 조문을 일본목록규칙(NCR, 1996), 영미목록규칙(AACR2R, 1998), ISBD(PM, 1991)와 비교해 그 차이점과 논란이 될 수 있는 부분에 대한 분석을 시도해 보았다.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.32 no.2
• /
• pp.213-237
• /
• 2001

This paper aims to improve the KCR and KORMARC for the cataloging electronic resources. In this study, therefore, at first the characteristics and kinds of electronic resources were examined as the backgrounds. Then the cataloging rules (AACR2R NCR1994, ISBD(ER) and KORMARC Descriptive Rule) and the MARC formats (MARC21, OCLC-MARC and KORMARC) were analyzed. Finally, the improvements of KCR and KORMARC for the cataloging electronic resources were suggested.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.46 no.2
• /
• pp.261-280
• /
• 2012

This study seeks to replace PaRIS Principles and find directions of revising KCR4 by analyzing the international Cataloging Principles 2009(ICP 2009) established in the environment of Machine Readable Cataloging. ICP 2009 was reflected in cataloging rules such as RDA and ISBD 2010 as the minimal principles for uniformity in establishing each nation's cataloging rules. In contrary, KCR4 needs to be revised because it has never been changed after 2003, and has only description rules without any rules for the choice and forms of access points. Therefore, this study aims to grasp requirements that should be reflected in KCR4 through analyzing ICP 2009. In first step, it is to grasp the features of ICP 2009 by comparing PaRIS Principle and ICP 2009 and to compare KCR4 in aspects of ICP 2009. The detailed elements for comparison between ICP 2009 and KCR4 are scope, general principles, entitles, attributes, and relationships, objectives and functions of the catalogue, bibliographic description, access points, foundations for search capabilities as the contents of ICP 2009. As a result, this study could give some directions of KCR4 in the future. First, ISBD 2010 and conceptual models should be reflected in KCR4 in description. Second, it should regulate the authority access points in KCR4 based on ICP 2009. Third, it will describe essential access points of work and expression attributes in bibliographic records and authority records to find works and expression. This study will contribute to guide the national cataloging rules.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.40 no.1
• /
• pp.181-207
• /
• 2009

The Korean Library Association has developed the Korean Cataloging Rules, fourth edition(KCR4) in 2003 and the National Library of Korea developed integrated version of KORMARC formats in 2006 on the basis of KCR4. Many educational institutions and libraries are currently cataloging based on KORMARC. Nevertheless, we have encountered many problems on KCR4 and KORMARC formats which needed to be modified. This study is aimed at pointing out the problems of KCR4 in describing 245 field which has a crucial and important role. Therefore, this study proposes the improvement methods of the use of parenthesis and subfield code in 245 field, and presents a description format of volume number, statement of responsibility and joint works including more than four persons.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.5-23
• /
• 2014

The bibliographic records have been built up following the Digital Library System (DLS) cataloging rules in the school libraries. But it is hard to use DLS cataloging rule as the standardization guidelines in building up the bibliographic records in school libraries because it is not the detailed cataloging rules, has inconsistency in its own rules, and disagrees with KCR4 rules. Therefore, this study is to suggest the new amendment for DLS cataloging rule to improve the bibliographic records quality and to produce the standardized bibliographic records. To grasp the problems of the DLS cataloging rules, DLS cataloging rule was analyzed with KCR4 rule and the interviews were conducted to the 9 school librarian that have experienced over 3 years. The result showed that it was needed to correct the terms to accord with KCR4, and to amend the DLS rule in each area.

• KLA journal
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.2-4
• /
• 1982

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.235-256
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to suggest a reform after detecting out issues and problems associated with the KCR 4th ed.(draft). KCR(Korean Cataloguing Rules) is representative cataloguing rules in Korea, the 4th ed.(draft) of which was prepared by Cataloguing Committee(department of KLA) in 2001. As a result of this study, a lot of problem which are glossary, context, inconsistency of the contents, rules applied to card catalog, and others, were found out. Thus, substantial improvements were able to be suggested.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 1997.08a
• /
• pp.117-120
• /
• 1997

KCR3과 AACR2R이 온라인 환경 즉, 온라인 목록에 부합되도록 실제적인 개선방안을 제시하고 있다. 구두법과 약자, 즉 몇몇 구두법에 대한 재정리 및 약자에 대한 완전철자 사용, masterfile에서의 청구기호의 위치, 서명저자사항에서 공저서 및 공저자 등의 생략없는 완전한 나열, 주기사항에 내용 및 목차주기의 제공, 표목지시로 이용자에게 다양한 접근점의 부출 등을 제시함으로서 온라인 목록에 부합되는 합리적인 편목규칙이 성립될 수 있을 것이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.147-154
• /
• 2002

본고에서는 한국목록규칙 제4판 초안에 있어서, 제8장 "정지화상자료"의 목록규칙을 분석하고자 한다. 이를 위해, International Standard Bibliographic Description for Non-Book Materials(1987), Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed. (1998), 그리고 일본목록규칙(1994)을 중심으로 비교하였다. 이에, 다양한 형태를 띄고 있는 정지화상자료에 있어서, KCR 4판의 "정지화상자료" 목록규칙이 목록규칙 사용자나 자료를 찾는 이용자로 하여금 편리하게 이용할 수 있도록 서지사항을 일관성있게 규정되어 있는지에 관하여 분석해 보고자 한다. 그리하여 초안을 더 수정·보완하여, KCR 4판을 발행하는데 있어서 조금이나마 도움이 되고자 한다.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.47 no.2
• /
• pp.201-229
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to make a suggestion on the Korean cataloging rules (KCR) for personal name access points. KCR4 revised in 2003 has been criticized in the absence of related rules. To the end, this study investigates (1) the objectives and functions of personal name access points in the changing bibliographic universe, (2) the detailed rules for persons in RDA and new NCR, and (3) the cases of personal name access points in LC(Library of Congress), NDL(National Diet Library in Japan) authority records. (4) Based on theses, suggested are rules and examples for recording attributes and the authorized access points of persons in KCR to be revised. The data were collected from literature review, the case study, and the interviews with catalogers.