• 제목/요약/키워드: K-hospital

검색결과 43,080건 처리시간 0.052초

국소적 섬유화 세로칸염에 의해 유발된 상대정맥증후군 1예 (Localized Fibrosing Mediastinitis with Superior Vena Caval(SVC) Syndrome)

  • 신상윤;김범경;박병훈;박선철;박준철;손명균;이승률;임의;전한호;정경수;정재헌;최유리;강경훈;최윤정;홍용국;김정주
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제63권4호
    • /
    • pp.387-391
    • /
    • 2007
  • 섬유화 세로칸염은 드문 양성질환으로 종격동 조직 내에 국소적이거나 광범위한 심한 섬유화성 병변을 유발하고 세로칸 내 장기들을 침범하거나 압박하여 증상이나 증후를 나타내는 질환이다. 그러나 저자들은 세로칸의 침범이 거의 없으면서 상대정맥 주위에 발생한 아주 국소적인 병변에 의하여 상대정맥증후군을 유발한, 혈관종양과 감별이 필요하였던 국소적 섬유화 세로칸염 1예를 경험하였기에 보고하는 바이다.

1주기 의료기관 평가에 대한 평가대상 기관 실무자들의 인식과 태도 조사 (The Opinion and Attitude of Hospital Managers toward Hospital Evaluation Program)

  • 이선희;김현미;하귀염;조희숙;채유미
    • 한국의료질향상학회지
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.77-91
    • /
    • 2008
  • Objectives : The purpose of this study was to survey the opinion and attitude of hospital managers toward the hospital evaluation program. Method : Managers of 157 hospitals which had participated in the hospital evaluation program were requested to respond to structured self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was composed with five categories: the preparation for the hospital evaluation program, the expertise levels of surveyors, the process and contents of the hospital evaluation program, the applying strategies for the result of the hospital evaluation to manager's work at their hospitals, and the main points to improve the hospital evaluation program. Result : 135 out of the 157 subjects completed the questionnaire, and the overall response rate was 86%. The hospital managers answered that they didn't have enough information such as the scoring rule of the standards, the process of the evaluation, and how to ask and get an answer to prepare the hospital evaluation. Furthermore, they estimated that the surveyors weren't specialized enough and didn't give a chance of checking over the result of the evaluation. In addition, they experienced that the result and feedback of the evaluation weren't enough information to be used as a guideline to improve in hospital management. Managers of the hospitals responded that the standards and method of survey in the hospital evaluation system should be reformed. Conclusion : Most of the responded managers seemed to have negative opinion on the hospital evaluation system, even though they were pushed up for interest in quality. Further studies and extensive evaluation of the hospital evaluation program are needed to bring up various information such as receptiveness and effectiveness.

  • PDF