• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.58 no.1
• /
• pp.265-290
• /
• 2006

The purposes of this study are: First, to investigate how the juvenile delinquents in the juvenile justice process evaluate their quality of life. Second, to examining which factors influence their quality of life. To accomplish these purposes, this study used sample of 570 juvenile delinquents in Seoul, Busan, Daejeon who are in the process of the juvenile justice and used the Korean Version of WHOQOL-BREF (brief version of WHO quality of life measure). To examine this purpose, Mean, standard deviation, t-test, One way ANOVA, multiple regression were conducted. The results are as follows: 1) juvenile delinquent in the process of the juvenile justice have complex problems and needs, and their quality of life are lower than the civil in the psychological, social relations, environment domain. 2) The factors influencing their quality of life in the general domain are stigma by parent, violent, undemocratic treatment in the process of the juvenile justice, family income level. But the factors of each domain of quality of life differ to some extent. Statistically significant factors of physical health domain are violent, undemocratic treatment in the process of the juvenile justice, first arrest time, stigma by others, sex, juvenile justice process. Significant factors of psychological health domain are delinquency frequency, stigma by parent, stigma by others, first arrest time, family income level, sex. Significant factors of social relations domain are first arrest time, stigma by parent, delinquency frequency, family income level, stigma by friend. Environment is significantly influenced by family income level, stigma by parent, sex, delinquency frequency, juvenile justice process.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.51
• /
• pp.183-210
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to investigate correction-level associated with the social support perceived by juvenile delinquents. To accomplish these purposes, this study used sample of 546 juvenile delinquents who are in the process of the beginning stage in the police and prosecution. Social support and correction were assessed with an instrument designed for this study. Juvenile delinquents completed instruments assessing the following variables: (1) perceived social support scale, specially social support types(esteem support, emotional support, informational support) and social support providers (parents, relatives, friends, teachers, community) (2) correction scale, specially social stigma, social deprivation, self reflection, legal consciousness, self concept. The resulting scale of the instrument had good internal reliability(Cronbach's alpha=. ) and was scored so that high scores indicated a willingness to access. To examine this purpose, One way ANOVA, multiple regression analysis were conducted. And the results are as follows: The relationship ratings of the correction factors were positively associated with their rating of the type of social support. Informational support was positively associated with self reflection and esteem support was positively associated with self concept, legal consciousness, self reflection and emotional support were positively associated with esteem. The type of support according to support providers was significant, explaining 25% of the variance in self concept scores. The significant predictor was esteem support from friends and emotional support from a community. The type of support according to support providers was significant, explaining 20% of the variance in legal consciousness scores. The significant predictor was informational support from teachers and esteem support from a community. The type of support according to support providers was significant, explaining 21% of the variance in self reflection scores. The significant predictor was esteem support and emotional one from relatives.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare
• /
• no.56
• /
• pp.69-99
• /
• 2016

Taking the perspective of children's welfare, this study aimed at critically analyzing the system of notification disposition which institutionalized children have experienced. Notification disposition is a juvenile justice process that, when a child (10 th 18 years old ) has been delinquent or is at risk for delinquency, is initiated without investigation or prosecution procedures by direct notification to a judge from the caregivers, school principals, chief probation officers, or directors of child care institutions. The data used in the analysis included case records of probation offices, and court sentencing documents of juvenile protective dispositions. Results showed that notification cases were initiated by directors of child shelters/care institutions. The most common reasons of notification were theft, runaway, physical violence, drinking, and smoking. Furthermore, there were more controversial reasons, such as "bad influence on another institutionalized children", "showing no remorse", "no sense of guilt"and "challenge of rearing in institutions" Based on the results, we discussed three problematic aspects of the direct notification system by directors of childcare institutions : (1) too much reliance on the judicature judgment of juvenile court; (2) less stability of the judicial status of notified children, and (3) inadequacies of the notifying eligibility for directors of child care institutions.