• 제목/요약/키워드: Junctional Adhesion Molecules

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.016초

Cadms/SynCAMs/Necls/TSLCs와 multi-PDZ domain protein MUPP1 단백질의 결합 (Cadms/SynCAMs/Necls/TSLCs Interact with Multi-PDZ Domain Protein MUPP1)

  • 장원희;정영주;최선희;김상진;엄상화;문일수;석대현
    • 생명과학회지
    • /
    • 제24권12호
    • /
    • pp.1276-1283
    • /
    • 2014
  • 조직의 구조 안정성을 유지하는 세포 사이 연접복합체는 multi-PDZ domain protein 1 (MUPP1)을 포함하여 50종류 이상의 단백질로 이루어져 있다. MUPP1은 13개의 PDZ 도메인을 가지는 단백질로서 막경유(transmembrane) 단백질과 세포골격단백질이나 신호단백질 사이에서 scaffold로 작용한다고 알려져 있지만, MUPP1이 어떻게 세포막인접 단백질들을 연결하고 구조 안정화에 기여하는지에 대해 아직 명확히 밝혀지지 않았다. 본 연구에서 MUPP1의 PDZ 도메인과 상호 작용하는 단백질을 규명하기 위하여 효모 two-hybrid 방법을 이용, cell adhesion molecule 1 (Cadm1; SynCAM1, Necl-2 또는 TSLC1로도 알려짐)이 MUPP1과 결합하는 것을 확인하였다. Cadm1은 MUPP1의 2번째 PDZ 도메인과 결합하며, Cadm1의 C-말단에 존재하는 II 형 PDZ-결합모티프(-Y-F-I)가 MUPP1과의 결합에 필수적임을 확인하였다. 또한 MUPP1은 다른 Cadm family 단백질들인 Cadm2, Cadm3, 그리고 Cadm4와도 결합하며, 이러한 단백질간 결합은 glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down assay와 공동면역침강으로도 추가 확인하였다. 생쥐의 뇌 파쇄액을 MUPP1 항체로 면역침강하였을 때 Cadm1과 Cadm4가 같이 침강하였다. 이러한 결과들은 MUPP1이 세포 사이 연접에서 Cadms와 세포골격 단백질 사이를 연결한다는 것을 시사한다.

성견 1면 골결손부에서 rhBMP-2/ACS가 치주조직 치유에 미치는 영향 (The Effects of rhBMP-2/ACS on the Periodontal Healing of 1-Wall Intrabony Defects in Dogs)

  • 전혜영;조규성;김종관;채중규
    • Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
    • /
    • 제29권4호
    • /
    • pp.873-893
    • /
    • 1999
  • The ultimate goal of periodontal therapy is the regeneration of periodontal tissue and repair of function. For more than a decade there have been many efforts to develop materials and bioactive molecule(such as growth factor and differentiation factors) to promote periodontal wound healing. Among the bioactive molecules, bone morphogenetic protein(BMP) was studied for periodontal wound healing. Since Urist demonstrated that demineralized bone matrix could induce the formation of cartilage and bone in ectopic site, many studies on BMP have been reported. Among those BMPs, it was reported that rhBMP-2 enhanced the healing of bone defects in animal studies and clinical studies. However, its efficacy in periodontal regeneration, especially 1-wall intrabony defects is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of rhBMP-2/ACS on the epithelial migration, gingival connective tissue adhesion, cementum formation, alveolar bone regeneration in intrabony defects of dogs. Four millimeter deep and four millimeter wide 1-wall defects were surgically created in the mesial aspects of the 3rd incisors. The test group received rhBMP-2/ACS with a flap procedure and the control underwent buffer/ACS with a flap procedure. Histologic analysis after 8 weeks of healing revealed the following results: 1. The length of epithelial growth(the distance from alveolar crest to the apical end of JE) was $0.9{\pm}1.5mm$ in the control group and $1.2{\pm}1.4mm$ in the test group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. 2. The length of connective tissue adhesion was $2.4{\pm}1.3mm$ in the control group and $1.2{\pm}1.1mm$ in the test group. The control group showed significantly enhanced adhesion(P<0.05). 3. The length of new cementum was $0.9{\pm}1.0mm$ in the control group and $1.7{\pm}0.8mm$ in the test group. The test group showed significantly enhanced cementum regeneration(P<0.05). 4. The length of new bone height was $1.9{\pm}0.6mm$ in the control group and $2.4{\pm}0.9mm$ in the test group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. 5. The new bone area was $4.7{\pm}1.7mm^2$ in the control group and $8.0{\pm}2.0mm^2$ in the test group. The test group showed significantly enhanced bone formed area(P<0.05). 6. The new bone density was $73.0{\pm}8.6%$ in the control group and $66.6{\pm}15.3%$ in the test group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. These results suggest that the use of rhBMP-2 in 1-wall intrabony defects has significant effect on new cementum and new bone formation area, but doesn't have any significant effect on the prevention of junctional epithelium migration and new bone formation height.

  • PDF