• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.1-24
• /
• 2003

This research investigates how teachers evaluate the School Comprehensive Evaluation administered by KEDI from 2000 to 2001. To provide basic data for improvement of the School Comprehensive Evaluation, the following six questions were asked: 1. What are the teachers' evaluations of the School Comprehensive Evaluation? 2. What are the teachers' evaluations of the operation of the School Comprehensive Evaluation? 3. What are the teachers' evaluations of the results of the School Comprehensive Evaluation? 4. What are the teachers' evaluations of the effects of the School Comprehensive Evaluation? 5. What are the teachers' opinions regarding the problems of the School Comprehensive Evaluation and solutions to them? 6. What are the teachers' evaluations of the open classrooms and evaluators? 360 questionnaires were distributed to teachers who had been working at the Busan and Ulsan Metropolitan City schools taken the School Comprehensive Evaluation, and 258 questionnaires were processed by a SPSS WIN. The followings are major findings of the study: 1. The teachers evaluated the School Comprehensive Evaluation to be more desirable compared to the usual School Evaluation. 2. They recognized the need for preliminary training with extended time about the School Comprehensive Evaluation. They evaluated that the procedure and area of the evaluation were quite valid. 3. They evaluated the evaluation reports were objective but not leading changes in the respective schools. 4. The School Comprehensive Evaluation did not much contributed to the improvement of the schools. 5. Stress from interview and class observation was the major problem to the teachers. 6. The teachers did prepare for their open classes, but highly evaluated the evaluator's professionalism.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제39권6호
• /
• pp.695-706
• /
• 2019

This study conducted a case study on the process-centered evaluation competency of a middle-school/high-school science teacher using Teacher's Process-centered Evaluation Competency (T-PEC) measurement tool. The case analysis shows that teacher A in a middle school represents high competency of process-centered evaluation planning and cooperative communication while the competency of utilizing process-centered evaluation results is low owing to the characteristics of non-standardized areas. Teacher B in a high school shows high level of cooperative communication competency whereas low level of process-centered evaluation execution competency because the freedom given to students is not enough during the process of evaluation. The teacher also shows very low level of utilizing process-centered evaluation results due to the lack of time and the school culture not giving feedback to the students. According to cross-case analysis, teacher A and B both represent the highest level of collaborative communication competency and the lowest level of utilization process-centered evaluation results competency. And the lack of clear criteria for process-centered evaluation leads to different understanding of process-centered evaluation between the two teachers, and teacher B shows low the level of utilizing process-centered evaluation affects results due to the students not being concerned on feedback, security problem, and the reality focusing on the university entrance examination in high schools. Based on the results, this study suggests providing clear guidelines of process-centered evaluation to teachers, introducing an application in order to solve the time-lack problem pointed out as the biggest problem of process-centered evaluation, ensuring objectivity and security about process-centered evaluation results, and building the school culture such as the expanded application of standardized areas in order to implementing process-centered evaluation.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.113-136
• /
• 2009

국가 연구개발사업의 효율성과 생산성을 제고하기 위하여, 정부에서는 '국가연구개발사업 등의 성과 평가 및 성과관리에 관한 법률'을 제정하여 정부 각 부처의 연구개발 사업 성과의 효율성을 증대시키고 있다. 본 논문은 국방연구개발사업 자체평가시스템 측면에서 메타평가를 실시하기 위하여 요인분석(Factor Analysis)을 통한 계층분석적 의사결정기법(AHP, Analytic Hierarchy Process)을 사용한 평가지표를 개발한 결과이다. 국방연구개발사업의 메타평가를 위한 평가요소로서 평가상황, 평가투입, 평가수행, 평가결과 등 4요소로 구분하여 평가지표를 개발하였다. 평가항목 선정을 위하여 평가요소 및 평가지표간 요인분석을 실시하여 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ 값을 측정한 결과, 평가상황요소는 0.877, 평가투입요소는 0.755, 평가결과요소는 0.792, 평가결과요소는 0.906으로 내적일관성을 고려한 신뢰성은 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 평가요소 및 평가항목별 가중치 산정은 AHP기법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과 조사자의 전체 일관성 지수는 0.09로 조사자의 일관성은 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.229-235
• /
• 2021

제4차산업혁명의 핵심기술 중의 하나로 인식되고 있는 블록체인은 인터넷을 기반으로 중앙집중적인 제어가 없이도 작동되는 자율적인 분산 정보관리시스템이다. 블록체인은 정보의 무결성, 신뢰성 등을 특징으로 하며, 이러한 특징을 필요로 하는 곳에는 블록체인을 활용할 수 있다. 대표적인 응용으로는 금융, 거래, 평가관리 등을 들 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 블록체인을 기반으로 사용자들이 자유롭게 평가개체(instance)를 생성하고 관리할 수 있는 평가관리시스템을 설계하였다. 평가관리자는 자신의 목적에 맞게 평가개체를 하나 생성하고, 평가항목과 평가자들을 배정할 수 있다. 평가자들이 평가항목에 대해서 평가를 마치면 평가관리자는 해당 평가개체에 대해서 평가 결과를 집계를 할 수 있다. 여러 용도로 평가를 시행하고 싶지만 평가시스템을 갖추지 못한 경우에 본 시스템을 이용하면 이를 비교적 간단히 평가시스템을 구현할 수 있다. 또한 블록체인의 특성으로 인하여 평가자들은 자신이 이미 기록한 평가 값을 수정하지 못하며, 시스템 관리자 또는 평가 관리자 역시 평가 값을 수정하지 못한다. 이런 이유로 평가의 신뢰성은 높아진다고 볼 수 있다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제51권2호
• /
• pp.185-202
• /
• 2023

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify key performance evaluation items and factors that are effective and practical for project management of defense standard standard improvement projects, and to develop a quantitative performance evaluation model. Methods: For the development of a performance evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects, we analyzed past major project performance and derived evaluation items and factors. To increase the objectivity and efficiency of project evaluation, we developed an evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of evaluation targets, and calculated the main importance of evaluation items using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the main opinions of expert groups. Results: The study resulted in the identification of main performance items for defense standard improvement projects, which were classified into defense standard conformity review performance and defense standard improvement performance items. We also simplified the evaluation model by integrating various evaluation items into similar evaluation factors. Additionally, we developed a quantitative evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of the targets and verified the objectivity and validity of the suggested performance evaluation model by reevaluating it using performance data from past commissioned professional institutions Conclusion: Developing a quantitative evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects is expected to provide a means of measuring the effectiveness of the project, and to be used as a tool to determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of medium and long-term project plans.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.219-230
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 해양치유단지의 조성을 위한 입지평가에 대한 연구로서 평가항목 및 평가지표를 도출하고 평가방법을 제안하였다. 입지평가를 위한 평가항목과 평가지표를 정하기 위해 해양치유단지 해외사례를 조사하고 선행 유사사업의 입지평가사례를 분석하였다. 정부의 해양치유산업 관련 정책 및 지자체 사업계획 등을 고려하여 3개 대분류 평가항목, 8개 중분류 평가항목, 5개 소분류 평가항목, 26개 평가지표를 정하였으며 각 평가지표별 평가기준을 정하였다. 평가방법은 먼저 전문가로 구성된 평가위원회에서 평가항목별 가중치를 부여하고 다음으로 각 평가위원이 개별 평가지표에 대해 가중치와 점수를 부여하여 평가점수를 산정한다. 이 평가점수에 평가항목별 가중치를 곱하여 평가지표별 최종점수를 정하고 모든 평가지표의 최종점수들을 합하면 각 평가위원의 평가점수가 되며 평가위원들 평가점수를 산술평균하면 대상지 입지평가결과가 된다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제42권3호
• /
• pp.15-29
• /
• 2011

The Fish Stock Rebuilding Plan (FSRP) is evaluated as one of the most effective fisheries policies domestically and internationally. FSRP is a comprehensive fisheries policy, including target stock size, rebuilding period, application of management measures, and participation of fishermen. The performance outcomes of FSRPs have been partially evaluated for recommendation for stock rebuilding in Korea, while they are fully evaluated in other countries that have implemented FSRPs. The performance evaluation system for FSRP is very needed to enhance its effectiveness as one of fisheries policies. That is, the system where problems can be reconsidered, achieving targets can be evaluated, and the plan can be modified should be implemented. This study classified the performance evaluation of FSRP into the economic evaluation as a quantitative analysis and the policy evaluation as a qualitative analysis. In the economic evaluation, the sustainability of fishery resources, the stability of fishing business, the efficiency of fishery production, and efficient utilization of fishery resources can be considered. As analytical methods for the economic evaluation, the bioeconomic model, efficiency estimation model, the dynamic MEY model can be utilized. The qualitative evaluation is to assess the qualitative performances of FSRPs, including interviews and surveys with fishermen and fisheries experts. In the survey, many different items can be included by evaluation factors which are related to policies such as timeliness, transparency, effectiveness, etc. In addition, the study suggested the performance evaluation system and procedures for objective and efficient evaluation of FSRPs. In order to practically apply the developed performance evaluation model, the pilot project is needed. That is, from the application of pilot project, detailed research methods, effective procedures, and evaluation factors can be investigated.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.129-144
• /
• 2013

Recognizing a limits on quantitative evaluation of cultural contents' and for its betterment, study aims developing a qualitative evaluation model. For this study, Reception Theory, Semiotics and Psychology were derived for epistemological dimension to contemplate culture contents' essential attribute. To be concrete, cultural contents was examined as experiential products, emotional products, rememberable products and texts. Also, codes of fun, emotion and culture were discussed as intrinsic attributes for cultural contents and how those attributes were expressed or composed in cultural contents was discussed as well. Evaluation items were extracted based on final discussion at the epistemic level, set up the final evaluation model by taking experts' advices on each items. With all those outcomes, qualitative evaluation model for cultural contents was developed. For the importance of each index in the model, priority was granted by weighting on each index. Lastly, evaluation scale was developed for each index. The culture contents' evaluation model developed in study is meaningful not only in drawing qualitative evaluation items of video(image) contents and developing the index and model for the first time, but also its possibility of wide use for other genres.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.59-77
• /
• 2018

Software process (SP) authentication is a certification system designed in order to improve software process and ensure software reliability of the Korean small and medium enterprises (SMEs). It is composed of 3 grades, 17 evaluation items and 70 detailed evaluation items (software process). In order to certificate grade 2, 42 detailed evaluation items must be satisfied. In order to certificate grade 3, all 70 detailed evaluation items must be satisfied. SMEs are more vulnerable to manpower and material resources than the major company. Therefore, it is difficult for SMEs to invest in the long term to improve the software process. If we can provide the core evaluation items to SMEs, SMEs will be able to improve software quality more efficiently and effectively. It can be used as a short way to acquire SP authentication. The evaluation items of SP are defined as influencing each other. Therefore, the core evaluation items might be established using related techniques. Although we searched for previous researches and related informations, the associated study was insufficient. In this study, ANP (Analytic Network Process) technique was applied, and the core evaluation items of SP authentication were established. SMEs will be able to acquire SP authentication more easily using the core evaluation items. Finally, we expect that this study will be used as a basis material for creating the SP 2.0 version.

• 한국컴퓨터산업학회논문지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.147-154
• /
• 2007

각 급 학교에서는 학습이 끝난 후에 실시하는 총괄평가의 결과만으로 학습평가를 하고 있는데 이러한 평가 방식은 학습자의 학습능력의 형성과정을 고려하지 않는 결과위주의 학습평가로 볼 수 있다. 또 기존의 학습평가는 학습 수행능력을 판정하기 위한 진단평가와 학습능력의 향상 정도를 측정하기 위한 형성평가를 각기 개별적으로 수행하여 평가하기 때문에 학습 수행능력을 보다 명확하게 처리하기 곤란한 점이 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 학습자의 능력을 보다 객관적으로 평가하기 위한 방안으로 퍼지 추론을 이용하여 진단평가와 형성평가를 통합 평가할 수 있는 학습평가 방법을 제안한다.