• Strategy21
• /
• 통권30호
• /
• pp.5-30
• /
• 2012

Jointness is a core concept of ROK military reform plan. ROK military has pursued to transform its military organization and capability for enhancing jointness and joint operation after the 1990s. It has strengthened the organization of JCS(Joint Chief of Staffs), introduced joint education, and acquired modernized weapons and equipment proper for joint operation. The 1986 Glodwater-Nichols Act of the U.S. military and lessons of the recent war provided a good direction how ROK military should take measures to enhance jointenss. In fact, defense reform efforts for jointness has produced invaluable fruits for transforming industrial age military forces into information age one which possesses more strong combat capabilities and develops joint business for efficient defense management. Nevertheless, there are many issues ROK military should address for stepping up the jointness. This paper well analyzes practical problems and issues ROK military faces to develop jointenss and draws policy recommendations for the policy makers.

• 한국과 국제사회
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.209-242
• /
• 2017

본 연구의 목적은 군사력의 유 무형 전력을 효과적으로 통합하여 전투력상승효과(synergy)를 극대화시키는 '합동성(Jointness)'을 기반으로 이순신장군의 4대 대첩 리더십 분석과 제언을 통해 한국군의 무형전력의 핵심인 정신전력 강화에 기여하기 위함이다. 우리군의 효율성 증진을 위해 하드웨어 차원에서 군 구조개선을 하고 있는데, 이를 실질적으로 뒷받침 할 소프트웨어 차원에서 동맹국과 우리군의 합동성 추진과정을 분석한 결과 미래지향적인 정신전력 강화 시스템구축과 더불어 무형전력이 핵심인 리더십과 관련된 제반 과제들과 함께 조화롭게 혁신되어야 한다고 판단된다. 국방정신전력 강화를 위한 군 구조개혁과 함께 추진하여야 할 소프트웨어 차원의 한국군 리더십에 관한 과제를 도출하기 위하여 합동성과 연계한 연구문제(1. 합동성시대 서구 선진국가의 군 리더십의 핵심은 무엇인가? 2. 이순신장군의 전사(戰史)를 통한 한국적 리더십의 현대적 조명)를 선정하여 문헌조사 방법과 본 연구자의 참전당시 현지 인터뷰결과와 이순신장군의 4대 대첩을 중심으로 한 리더십 전사(戰史)를 모델로 고찰한 결과, 1) 미래를 예측하고 대비할 수 있는 전략적 리더십, 2) 상승효과를 발휘할 수 있는 융합의 리더십, 3) 전투중심으로 실천할 수 있는 지식의 리더십을 도출하게 되었다. 아울러 합동성을 기반으로 한 정신전력강화를 위해서는 첫째, 합동성 증진을 위한 심층깊고 실질적인 리더십진단이 선행되어야 하고, 둘째, 국방부와 육 해 공군 리더십센터와 PKO센터의 차별화와 통합에 관한 효율성을 과학적으로 비교분석한 후 국방개혁과 함께 합동성 증진을 위한 통합노력을 구현해야 하며, 셋째, 국방부 예하 무형전력 관련기관의 통폐합을 해야 한다는 결론에 도출하였다.

• 정보화연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.169-180
• /
• 2013

합동작전에 참여하는 부대가 효과적으로 임무를 수행하기 위해서는 조직, 시스템, 장비, 교리 절차 등 전 영역(물리 정보 인지 사회)에서의 상호운용성이 우선적으로 달성되어야 한다. 기존의 상호운용성 평가모델들을 분석해보면 하드웨어 중심의 평가에서 시스템, 조직, 작전 등으로 평가 범위가 확장되었으며, 이러한 과정에서 많은 모델들은 전투발전요소를 평가항목에 포함시켰다. 그러나 대부분의 모델들은 전투발전요소의 일부만을 평가항목으로 적용하고 있어 전투발전요소 전체에 대한 상호운용성 평가가 제한되고, 모델을 효과적으로 적용하기 위한 프로세스의 구체화와 평가결과에 대한 객관성을 보장하기 위한 측정기준 개발 등 추가적인 연구가 요구되는 상태이다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 제한사항을 보완하기 위해 전투발전요소 전체를 평가항목으로 적용하는 '전투발전요소 중심의 상호운용성 평가모델'을 제안한다. 제안된 모델은 능력개념을 도입하였고, 전투발전요소 전체를 적용하여 평가대상의 상호운용성 수준을 보다 총체적으로 비교 평가할 수 있다. 또한 이 모델은 각 전투발전요소의 상호운용성 속성 중에서 합동성과 관련된 속성을 선별 및 적용하여 합동작전에 참여하는 부대의 합동성 수준까지 비교 평가할 수 있는 장점을 가지고 있다.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권3호
• /
• pp.73-120
• /
• 2005

Today's world is generation of Transformation. The Term "Transformation" is widely used in many nations and international organizations such as U.S. and NATO to describe the course of change undertaken by militaries to respond to the new and emerging security environment. Transformation involves all elements of the defense enterprise including Operational Environment, Operational Concepts, Doctrine, Structure and Technologies, within a supportive Cultures context. An Operational Environment is defined as "a composite of conditions, circumstances, and influences that affect the employment of military forces and bear on the decisions of the unit commander." The context for developing future military concept and capability lies essentially within the anticipated boundaries of the operational environment in a collective sense. The joint operational environment is essential to the nation's defense. It describes volatile, complex, and dangerous environment in which the military personnel. organizations, and material will operate. Implications coming forth from joint Operational Environment are but a starting point - many others exist. More and better Implications will come forth as people think about massages of Operational Environment, experiment its characteristics, learn to deal with its threats and scenarios, apply their experience and judgement, and then consider what is required of Korean military doctrine, organizations, training and education, material development, and leadership for operations in the joint Operational Environment.

• 한국조리학회지
• /
• 제23권7호
• /
• pp.194-203
• /
• 2017

The data collection and questionnaire survey were conducted from July 1, 2016, to August 30, 2016, and the final analysis was conducted with 273 copies. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS (V 23.0) and AMOS (V 21.0) programs. In order to identify the characteristics of the respondents, the frequency analysis was performed, and the reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed for each measurement item. The conceptual reliability (CR) and standard variance extraction (AVE) values were calculated to verify the validity. Correlation analysis was conducted to measure the associations among the derived factors. For the hypothesis test, a structural equation modeling was used to test the jointness and organic causality of the whole model. In addition, an alternative model with a nested relationship with the basic model was set up to test the adjustment effect of the learner's educational environment on the educational satisfaction and behavioral intention. The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of educational environment on the educational satisfaction and behavioral intention of students at a cooking education institute in Busan. The implication of this study is that the operators of educational institutions should recognize the human factors as important means of marketing for the activation of cooking education and select instructors by applying more systematic and objective criteria when hiring instructors. Also, consideration should be given to support programs such as training programs and incentives to develop instructor's abilities. In addition, the positive educational outcomes of students may have a positive impact on financial performance, such as livelihood of other students and sales of educational institutions.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권31호
• /
• pp.85-119
• /
• 2013

This paper asks whether the Republic of Korea (ROK) Navy should continue to focus on building ocean-going naval ships when it faces the threats of North Korean provocations in littoral areas. My position is that the ROK Navy should keep pursuing ocean-going capabilities. I provide explanations why it should do so from the perspectives of three important dimensions: capability, doctrine, and organizational identity. First, I argue that the distinction between a littoral navy and an ocean-going navy is an unnecessary dichotomy. It may lead to inefficiency in national security. The military posture should be designed in a way that it can address all external threats to national security regardless of whether they are from North Korea or not. Such capability is the one that the ROK Navy has tried to acquire with the 'Blue Water Navy' initiative since the 1990s. Second, also from the perspective of lately developed military doctrines that emphasize jointness and precision strike capability, ocean-going capabilities such as the mobile task fleet program have become a must, not an option, given today's security situations on and around the Korean peninsula. Lastly, I draw attention to the fact that the 'Blue Water Navy (BWN)' initiative meant more than just capability to the ROK navy. The BWN represents the ROK navy's organizational identity that the navy has defined since the 1980s as it emphasized promoting national interest and international standing as part of its organizational essence. Furthermore, the phrase 'blue water navy' took on symbolic meanings to the people that are associated with South Korean-ness including sovereignty, national pride, standing in the world and hopes for the future. Since 1990s, many scholars and experts have made the case for the necessity of improving South Korea's naval capability based on different rationales. They emphasized the protection of Sea Lines of Communication (SLOCs), the economic value of the sea, the potential danger associated with territorial disputes over islands, and increasing naval power of neighboring countries since the end of the Cold War. This paper adds to this debate by trying to explain the matter with different factors including naval doctrines and organizational identity. Particularly, this paper constitutes a unique endeavor in that it incorporating constructivist elements (that is, identity politics) in explaining a national security matter.