• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제56권3호
• /
• pp.258-268
• /
• 2018

목적: 본 연구는 보철물의 적합 및 인상의 정확성에 관한 문헌들을 체계적으로 고찰하여 구강 내 스캐너를 이용한 디지털 인상법이 전통적인 인상법을 대체할 만한 정확도를 보이는지 알아보고자 한다. 재료 및 방법: 1997년 8월 1일부터 2017년 7월 31일까지 출판된 영어로 쓰여진 연구를 대상으로 디지털 인상법의 정확성에 대한 문헌을 MEDLINE/PubMed 전자 검색 및 수기탐색을 시행하였다. 조건에 따라 선택된 연구의 데이터를 스프레드 시트에 2명의 검토자가 독립적으로 정리하였다. 결과: 총 35개의 연구가 선택되었고, 26개의 연구는 보철물의 적합성을 비교하였고 9개의 연구는 보철물 없이 스캔 데이터를 통해 인상의 정확성을 비교하였다. 대부분의 연구가 보철물을 이용해 인상법의 정확성을 비교하였다. 결론: 본 고찰에 따르면 자연치열에서 디지털 인상법으로 단일관이나 근원심으로 길이가 짧은 보철물을 제작하는 것은 임상적으로 충분히 신뢰할만한 하다. 그러나 디지털 인상법으로 길이가 긴 보철물을 제작하는 것은 연구가 적어 아직 한계가 있다. 임플란트 보철물 제작에 있어서 구내스캐너를 이용한 디지털 인상법으로 전통적인 인상법을 완전히 대체하기는 아직 어렵다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.354-362
• /
• 2016

PURPOSE. The trueness and precision of acquired images of intraoral digital scanners could be influenced by restoration type, preparation outline form, scanning technology and the application of power. The aim of this study is to perform the comparative evaluation of the 3-dimensional reproducibility of intraoral scanners (IOSs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. The phantom containing five prepared teeth was scanned by the reference scanner (Dental Wings) and 5 test IOSs (E4D dentist, Fastscan, iTero, Trios and Zfx Intrascan). The acquired images of the scanner groups were compared with the image from the reference scanner (trueness) and within each scanner groups (precision). Statistical analysis was performed using independent two-samples t-test and analysis of variance (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. The average deviations of trueness and precision of Fastscan, iTero and Trios were significantly lower than the other scanners. According to the restoration type, significantly higher trueness was observed in crown and inlay than in bridge. However, no significant difference was observed among four sites of preparation outline form. If compared by the characteristics of IOS, high trueness was observed in the group adopting the active triangulation and using powder. However, there was no significant difference between the still image acquisition and video acquisition groups. CONCLUSION. Except for two intraoral scanners, Fastscan, iTero and Trios displayed comparable levels of trueness and precision values in tested phantom model. Difference in trueness was observed depending on the restoration type, the preparation outline form and characteristics of IOS, which should be taken into consideration when the intraoral scanning data are utilized.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.29-40
• /
• 2020

목적: Encoded healing abutment와 scan body를 이용한 디지털 인상과 pick-up 인상용 코핑을 이용한 인상 채득법의 정확도를 다른 임플란트 식립 각도에서 비교 연구하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 3D 프린터를 이용해 주모형을 제작하고 0°, 10° 및 20°의 근심경사로 3개의 임플란트를 위치 시켰다. 각각의 임플란트에 지대주를 체결하고 주모형을 스캔하여 참조 모델을 만들었다. P군 모델은 pick-up 인상용 코핑을 사용하여 15개의 석고 모형을 만들고 지대주를 장착 후 스캔하여 제작하였다. E군과 S군의 모델은 각각 encoded healing abutment와 scan body를 주모형에 체결하고 구내 스캐너를 이용해 15회씩 인상채득을 하여 제작하였다. 각각의 실험군 STL 파일은 best fit alignment를 이용해 참조 모델과 중첩하였고 root mean square (RMS) 값을 분석하였다. 결과: RMS 값은 P군에서 가장 작았고(25.56 ± 2.53 ㎛), 그다음 S군(35.27 ± 2.56 ㎛), E군(38.29 ± 4.12 ㎛) 순 이었다. S군과 E군 사이에는 유의차가 없었고, P군은 S군과 E군 보다 작았다(P < 0.05). 임플란트 각도와 RMS 값의 상관관계는 E군에서 유의하였다(P < 0.05). 결론:Pick-up 인상용 코핑 방법은 encoded healing abutment와 scan body 인상 채득 방법에 비해 더 높은 정확도를 보였고 encoded healing abutment와 scan body 인상 방법은 정확도에서 유의한 차이가 없었다. Encoded healing abutment의 임상적 사용은 가능하나 경사진 임플란트의 인상의 경우 주의하여 사용해야 할 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제51권2호
• /
• pp.95-104
• /
• 2021

Objective: To evaluate the trueness and precision of full-arch scans acquired using five intraoral scanners and investigate the factors associated with the dimensional accuracy of the intraoral scan data. Methods: Nine adult participants (mean age, 34.3 ± 8.3 years) were recruited. Four zirconium spheres (Ø 6 mm) were bonded to the canines and the molars. Following acquisition of reference scans using an industrial-grade scanner, five intraoral scanners, namely i500, CS3600, Trios 3, iTero, and CEREC Omnicam, were used to scan the arches. Linear distances between the four reference spheres were automatically calculated, and linear mixed model analysis was performed to compare the trueness and precision of the intraoral scan data among the different scanners. Results: The absolute mean trueness and precision values for all intraoral scanners were 76.6 ± 79.3 and 56.6 ± 52.4 ㎛, respectively. The type of scanner and the measured linear distances had significant effects on the accuracy of the intraoral scan data. With regard to trueness, errors in the intermolar dimension and the distance from the canine to the contralateral molar were greater with Omnicam than with the other scanners. With regard to precision, the error in the linear distance from the canine to the molar in the same quadrant was greater with Omnicam and CS3600 than with the other scanners. Conclusions: The dimensional accuracy of intraoral scan data may differ significantly according to the type of scanner, with the amount of error in terms of trueness being clinically significant.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.205-215
• /
• 2021

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of three intraoral scanner (IOS) systems with three different dental arch widths. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three dental models with different intermolar widths (small, medium, and large) were attached to metal bars of different lengths (30, 40, and 50 mm). The bars were measured with a coordinate measuring machine and used as references. Three IOSs were compared: TRIOS 3 (TRI), True Definition (TD), and Dental Wings (DW). The relative length and angular deviation of both ends of the metal bars from the scan data set (n = 15) were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS. Comparing among scanners in terms of trueness, the relative length deviation of DW in the small (1.28%) and medium (1.08%) arches were significantly higher than TRI (0.46% and 0.48%) and TD (0.33% and 0.18%). The angular deviation of DW in the small (1.75°) and medium (1.83°) arches were also significantly greater than TRI (0.63° and 0.40°) and TD (0.55° and 0.89°). Comparing within scanner, the large arch of DW showed better accuracy than other arch sizes (P < .05). On the other hand, the larger arch of TD presented a greater tendency of angular deviation in terms of trueness. No significant differences were found in terms of trueness between the arch widths of TRI group. CONCLUSION. The different widths of the dental arches can affect the accuracy of some intraoral scanners in full arch scan.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제12권5호
• /
• pp.299-306
• /
• 2020

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of six recently introduced intraoral scanners (IOSs) for single crown preparations isolated from the complete arch, and to determine the effect of scanning sequence on accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A complete arch with right and left canine preparations for single crowns was used as a study model. The reference dataset was obtained by scanning the complete arch using a highly accurate industrial scanner (ATOS Core 80, GOM GmbH). Six different IOSs (Trios, iTero, Planmeca Emerald, Cerec Omnicam, Primescan, and Virtuo Vivo) were used to scan the model ten times each. The scans performed with each IOS were divided into two groups, based on whether the scanning sequence started from the right or left quadrant (n=5). The accuracy of digital impression was evaluated using three-dimensional analyzing software (Geomagic Studio 12, 3D Systems). The Kruskal Wallis and Mann- Whitney U statistical tests for trueness analysis and the One-way ANOVA test for precision analysis were performed (α=.05). RESULTS. The trueness and precision values were the lowest with the Primescan (25 and 10 ㎛), followed by Trios (40.5 and 11 ㎛), Omnicam (41.5 ㎛ and 18 ㎛), Virtuo Vivo (52 and 37 ㎛), iTero (70 and 12 ㎛) and Emerald (73.5 and 60 ㎛). Regarding trueness, iTero showed more deviation when scanning started from the right (P=.009). CONCLUSION. The accuracy of digital impressions varied depending on the IOS and scanning sequence used. Primescan had the highest accuracy, while Emerald showed the most deviation in accuracy for single crown preparations.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제61권3호
• /
• pp.245-256
• /
• 2023

임플란트 고정성 보철물 제작 시 디지털 시스템을 이용하여 수복할 때, 3차원적인 임플란트 위치의 구내 스캔과 임시 의치 혹은 임시 보철물 장착 후 구내 스캔을 이용한 이중 디지털 스캐닝(double digital scanning) 기법이 필요하다. 구내 스캔 시, 스캔 바디를 안정적인 랜드마크로 이용하면 다지털 인상의 정확도 향상과 기공과정이 효율적이고 단순화될 수 있다. 본 증례는 완전 디지털 시스템을 활용하여 맞춤형 치과용 임플란트 지대주 및 임시 보철물, 최종 보철물을 계획하고 제작하였다. 임플란트 식립 후, 임플란트에 체결한 구내 스캔 바디와 임시 의치 조직면에 인기 된 구내 스캔 바디의 스캔 영역을 중첩하였다. 중첩된 파일에서 임시 의치의 수직 고경에 맞는 맞춤형 치과용 임플란트 지대주와 임시 보철물을 제작하여 환자에게 시적 하였고, 임시 보철물을 토대로 최종 보철물을 제작하였다. 임시 의치 제작 시 설정한 수직 고경, 중심위 등을 최종 보철물까지 활용하여 기능 및 심미적으로 만족할 만한 결과를 얻어 이를 보고하고자 한다.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제54권2호
• /
• pp.108-122
• /
• 2016

Prosthetic-driven implant placement is a concept considering the dental implant restoration first based on the final form of that prosthesis to be restored. The latest development of the imaging technology and digital dentistry was able to be obtained the high quality images of CBCT with low radiation exposure and it has also enabled the process to reconstruct the intraoral state in three dimensions due to the development of the intraoral, model and impression scanner. Computer-guided implant placement simulations and template production was able to be more widely used in this context. In this narrative review, the features and the types of implant surgical guides will be introduced. It will also be described the diagnosis and treatment plan using computerguided implant software to reduce the number of visit and to increase the accuracy of the implant surgery through the top-down approach based on the shape and location of the final prosthesis.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.14-24
• /
• 2022

이 연구의 목적은 디지털 치열 모형에서 치아 폭경, 볼튼 비율, 수평 피개, 수직 피개를 포함한 교정적 측정의 타당성을 확인하는 것이다. 만 12 - 18세의 환자를 대상으로 세가지 형태의 치열 모형을 획득하였다. 기존의 석고 모형을 형성하였고, DOF freedom HD 모형 스캐너를 통해 디지털 모형으로 변환하였다. 그리고 CS3600 구강 스캐너로 디지털 모형을 형성하였다. 각 모형에서 측정 시행 후, 급내 상관 계수를 통해 계측의 신뢰성과 재현성을 확인하였으며, 대응 표본 t 검정을 사용하여 타당성을 평가하였다. 결과적으로 모든 군에서 급내 상관계수는 0.750을 초과하여 연구자 내 신뢰성과 연구자 간 재현성이 있음을 확인하였다. 모형 스캔한 군은 전체 및 전치 볼튼 비율, 수평 및 수직 피개에서 타당성을 보였다. 구강 스캔한 군은 전치 볼튼 비율, 수평 피개에서 타당성을 보였다. 구강 스캔한 디지털 모형을 이용한 계측은 인상 채득에 어려움이 있는 소아 청소년에게 고려할 수 있는 대안이다. 하지만 임상에서 이를 교정적 분석에 이용할 경우 오차를 고려한 적용이 필요하다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제11권6호
• /
• pp.331-340
• /
• 2019

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of three intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch and evaluate the feasibility of the assessment methodology for further in vivo analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A specific measurement pattern was fabricated and measured using a coordinate measuring machine for the assessment of control distances and angles. Afterwards, the pattern was placed and fixed in replica of an upper jaw for their subsequent scans (10 times) using 3 intraoral scanners, namely iTero Element1, Trios 3, and True Definition. 4 reference distances and 5 angles were measured and compared with the controls. Trueness and precision were assessed for each IOS: trueness, as the deviation of the measures from the control ones, while precision, as the dispersion of measurements in each reference parameter. These measurements were carried out using software for analyzing 3-dimensional data. Data analysis software was used for statistical and measurements analysis (α=.05). RESULTS. Significant differences (P<.05) were found depending on the intraoral scanner used. Best trueness values were achieved with iTero Element1 (mean from 10 ± 7 ㎛ to 91 ± 63 ㎛) while the worst values were obtained with Trios3 (mean from 42 ± 23 ㎛ to 174 ± 77 ㎛). Trueness analysis in angle measurements, as well as precision analysis, did not show conclusive results. CONCLUSION. iTero Element1 was more accurate than the current versions of Trios3 and True Definition. Importantly, the proposed methodology is considered reliable for analyzing accuracy in any dental arch length and valid for assessing both trueness and precision in an in vivo study.