• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.13-25
• /
• 2019

Recently, as evaluation of information security (IS) management become more diverse and complicated, the contents and procedure of the evidence to prepare for actual assessment are rapidly increasing. As a result, the actual assessment is a burden for both evaluation agencies and institutions receiving assessments. However, most of them reflect the evaluation system used by foreign government agencies, standard organizations, and commercial companies. It is necessary to consider the evaluation system suitable for the domestic environment instead of reflecting the overseas evaluation system as it is. The purpose of this study is as follows. First, we will present the problems of the existing information security assessment system and the improvement direction of the information security assessment system through analysis of existing information security assessment system. Second, it analyzes the technical guidance for information security testing and assessment and the evaluation of information security management in the Special Publication 800-115 'Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment' of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we will build a framework to implement the evidence collection system and present a system implementation method for the '6. Information System Security' of 'information security management actual condition evaluation index'. The implications of the framework development through this study are as follows. It can be expected that the security status of the enterprises will be improved by constructing the evidence collection system that can collect the collected evidence from the existing situation assessment. In addition, it is possible to systematically assess the actual status of information security through the establishment of the evidence collection system and to improve the efficiency of the evaluation. Therefore, the management system for evaluating the actual situation can reduce the work burden and improve the efficiency of evaluation.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.53-81
• /
• 2019

IFLA의 UN 2030 Agenda, 도서관정보정책위원회의 제3차 도서관발전종합계획(2019-2023)에서 사회적 포용을 실천하는 도서관의 역할을 강조함에 따라 최근 국내외를 막론하고 정보불평등을 해소하기 위한 공공서비스기관으로서 도서관이 새롭게 조명되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 도서관에 적합한 정보불평등 측정지표를 개발하였으며, 이를 위해 전문가 집단의 검증단계로서 FGI 및 델파이기법을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 최종지표는 총 3개의 평가영역, 총 12개의 평가항목, 총 30개의 평가지표로 도출되었다. 구체적으로 첫째, 접근 평가영역에서는 3개의 평가항목, 8개의 평가지표가 도출되었으며, 둘째, 역량 평가영역에서는 5개의 평가항목, 12개의 평가지표가 도출되었고, 셋째, 활용 평가영역에서는 4개의 평가항목, 10개의 평가지표가 도출되었다. 본 연구는 현재 범지구적으로 도서관에 적용 가능한 정보불평등 측정지표가 전무한 상황에서 개발되었다는 점에서 무엇보다 그 의미와 가치가 클 것으로 사료된다.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.203-224
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation perspectives of IT business value and empirically analyze the differences of evaluation perspectives between ex ante evaluation and post implementation evaluation, and among various information system types. 4 evaluation perspectives which have been used in the previous studies and in the field of industry practices are financial, customer, internal process, and growth, which are based on the BSC model. Data of 98 information systems have been collected from 89 companies including manufacturers, banks, insurances, and stock trading companies. As results of multi-way MANOVA test, 3 out of 8 hypothesis have been accepted statistically. While the order of importance of 4 perspectives in ex ante evaluation is customer, financial, internal process, and growth, the order of post implementation evaluation appears to be much different : that is, internal process, customer, financial, and growth. These findings provide insights for both IT practitioners and researchers.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.73-95
• /
• 2010

This study shows the scientific and systematic Evaluation Model using factor analysis and AHP methods for the success of defense Information System R&D projects. The evaluation model was divided into 7 evaluation factors such as Developing support, Developing infrastructure, Developing management and test & evaluation, Support factors for strength, Understanding & developing strategy, Developing technology & organization, and Developing performance. And those were composed of totally 24 low level Evaluation index. The Developed Evaluation Model in the paper could be contributed more to objectively and transparently company selection of defense Information System R&D and other defense R&D Projects in the future.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.127-132
• /
• 2014

Some laws and regulations may require internet service providers to provide services based on the age of users. Age verification in the online environment should be used as a tool to provide service that is appropriate to child based on age. Using the minimum attribute information, processes on age verification provides the proper guidance to the internet services. However, there is a lack of a globally accepted trust framework for age verification process including evaluation factors for age verification information. In this paper the federation model of user attributes were described and evaluation factors for the age verification information were suggested. Also using the suggested evaluation factors, performance evaluation of federation model of user evaluation was performed. To meet the requirements of evaluation factors, framework of federation model should consider the unlinkability pseudonym support, eavesdropping protection and cloning protection.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.61-69
• /
• 2016

Growing information threats have threatened organization to lose information security controls in these days. Many organizations have accepted the various information security management systems does mention necessity of a continuous evaluation process for the executions of information security management in a theoretical aspect. This study suggests a continuous evaluation process for information security management reflecting the real execution of managers and employees in organizations.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 1994

본(本) 연구(硏究)는 정보자료(情報資料)의 선택과 평가에 관련된 이론과 도서관에 응용된 사례를 중심으로 고찰한 것이다. 본 연구에서는 정보자료의 선택과 평가에 관한 선행연구를 통계적(統計的) 평가방법(評價方法), 비용(費用) 대(對) 효과(效果)의 방법, 전문가 시스템 방법의 3가지 유형으로 구분하였다. 또한 본(本) 연구(硏究)에서는 정보자료의 선택과 평가를 위하여 개발된 전문가 시스템의 이론적 배경과 응용시스템의 개발현황(開發現況)과 전망에 대하여 고찰하였다.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.1-30
• /
• 1994

본(本) 연구(硏究)는 정보자료(情報資料)의 선택과 평가에 관련된 여러 이론과 도서관에 응용된 사례를 중심으로 고찰한 것이다. 본 연구에서는 정보자료의 선택과 평가에 관한 선행연구를 통계적(統計的) 평가방법(評價方法), 비용(費用) 대(對) 효과(效果)의 방법, 전문가 시스템 방법의 3가지 유형으로 구분하였다. 또한 본(本) 연구(硏究)에서는 정보자료의 선택과 평가를 위하여 개발된 전문가 시스템의 이론적 배경과 응용 시스템의 개발현황(開發現況)과 전망에 대하여 고찰하였다.

• 정보처리학회논문지D
• /
• 제15D권3호
• /
• pp.387-398
• /
• 2008

최근 정보화에 대한 성과평가는 투자성과에 미치는 효과를 정량적, 정성적으로 분석하여, 전통적인 투자 수익률에 근거한 가치평가방법의 한계를 극복하기 위한 다양한 성과평가방법이 응용되고 있다. 하지만 공공분야의 성과평가는 평가영역에 대한 정성적 평가 중심의 성과여부를 도출하는데 머무를 뿐, 정보화 품질을 향상시키는 데까지는 이르지 못하는 단점이 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 기존 공공분야 성과평가의 한계점을 개선하고 품질평가와 정량적 평가를 반영함으로써, 정보화 품질 향상과 평가결과의 객관성 및 신뢰성을 보장하는 통합성과평가모델을 제안한다. 그리고 정보화사업으로 추진된 행정정보DB구축사업을 대상으로 사업목적을 고려한 평가영역별 반영비율 및 가중치를 적용한 평가결과를 도출하였다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.291-298
• /
• 2000

Objective : Use of Internet for health related information is rapidly increasing. There is, however, no consensus as to which information is correct and reliable. This study was conducted to develop an evaluation standards for health related information on the Internet for the purpose of delivering correct information to internet users. Methods : A Delphi technique, which involved a panel of 65 experts, was used as the research design for this study. In the first round, the initial evaluation criteria which consisted of 12 items was developed through a literature review by the researcher and the items represented 2 categories, structure and function. In the second round, a semi-structured questionnaire was sent to the experts with the initial evaluation tool and the respondents identified 55 items. In the third round, these 55 items were analyzed for content validity by the experts and a total of 35 items were included in the model; 11 items in the structural area, 24 in the functional area. Conclusions : Development of indicators for the evaluation of internet site for health information is crucial to provide correct and reliable information. For evaluation to be effective further evaluation programs need to be developed so that users can be sure that the information they received is accurate.