• 제목/요약/키워드: Indicators of evaluation

검색결과 1,563건 처리시간 0.025초

스마트 홈(Smart Home) 앱 디자인의 사용성 평가를 위한 평가지표 개발 (Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Usability Evaluation of Smart Home App Design)

  • 이만;김맹호
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제19권5호
    • /
    • pp.249-258
    • /
    • 2019
  • 현재는 스마트 홈 사업에 대한 사람들의 관심이 증가하고 있다. 따라서 스마트 홈 시스템에 대하여 연구가 중요해지고 있다. 스마트 홈 시스템에서 중요한 구성 부분인 스마트 홈 앱은 지속적으로 관심을 위해서는 사용성을 고려한 평가지표 개발이 중요하다. 이에 본 논문은 스마트 홈 앱을 대상으로 스마트 홈 앱 디자인의 사용성 평가지표 개발하고자 하는데 있다. 본 연구를 위하여 델파이 기법을 이용하여 3차에 걸쳐 조사를 실시하였다. 1차 조사에서는 문헌고찰을 통해 도출된 평가 영역에 대한 전문가들의 의견을 수렴하고 내용타당도 비율(CVR) 값을 분석하여 적절한 영역 8개를 선정하였다. 1차 조사 결과를 바탕으로 국내외 선행연구와 사용자 인터뷰 조사를 통해 총 38개 평가 항목을 수집하였다. 수집된 38개 평가 항목은 2, 3차에서 평균(M), 표준편차(SD), 내용타당도 비율(CVR), 합의도(H), 수렴도(QD) 등을 분석하고 최종 8개 영역 하위에 포함된 27개 항목을 선정되었다. 본 연구 결과는 스마트 홈 앱 디자인의 사용성 평가 시 가이드라인으로 활용될 수 있다.

산업 R&D 프로그램의 성과지표개발에 관한 사례연구 (Case Study on the Development of Performance Indicators of Industrial R&D Program)

  • 양춘희;이재하
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제35권2호
    • /
    • pp.1-8
    • /
    • 2012
  • The primary goal of this study is to develop proper performance indicators for evaluating the results of industrial R&D program. We define R&D results include output, transfer, outcome, and impact in the performance of R&D program. Performance indicators are focused on the results of R&D commercialization, building the industrial foundations as performance proxy of R&D program of Ministry of Knowledge Economy. And we first try to design the coupled structure as logical model between R&D program goals and performance indicators. The coupled structure is represented with objectives of group unit of R&D program, implementation process, R&D practical stage, and the ultimate goal of R&D program.

복부수술 환자간호의 질평가 도구 개발 (Development of an evaluation tool for the quality of nursing care in abdominal surgery patients)

  • 이병숙
    • 간호행정학회지
    • /
    • 제4권1호
    • /
    • pp.107-127
    • /
    • 1998
  • The purpose of this study was to develop an evaluation tool for the quality of nursing care in abdominal surgery patient. The target subjects of the tool were adult patients having abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Process-outcome framework was selected for the development of the tool in this study. The results were as follows. 1. Nine standards. 40 criteria and 88 indicators were developed. A standard was summary statement of the ideal level of excellencein a dimension of quality of nursing care. which could be evaluated by criteria. Several criteria indicated a specific standard and each criterion could be measured by observable and measurable indicators. 2. The standards were divided into two dimensions. One was process dimension which contained four standards(23 criteria), the other was outcome dimension which contatined five standards(17 criteria). 3. Average CVI was .985 at 9 standards. .947 at 40 criteria. and .987 at 88 indicators. 4. The evaluation tool for the quality of nursing care in abdminal surgery patients was a criterion-referenced tool. And data collection methods of the tool were investigation of patient's record and interview( or questionnaire) with the patients. 5. Interrater reliabilities of the tool were ; r= .7572 (agreement between two raters), and pI=.8487 (intraclass correlation between five raters who rated the 84 patients). 6. Internal consistency reliability ${\alpha}$ was .6194, which was obtained from 32 criteria. Eight criteria were missed in the analyzing process because of data omission. 7. Scores of the process and the outcome dimensions showed significant. but low correlation(r= .3759, p < .001). 8. There were significant differences in total scores between the hospitals and the departments of surgery(F = 15.233. p .0001). There was also significant interaction effect between hospitals and departments to total score(F = 8.396. p = .0001). Construct validity of the toool was verified by the known-group method. these kinds of difference were expected by the nursing experts participated in the study. From these results, more specific patient classification is suggested for the development of evaluation tool of the quallity of nursing care. And indicators to be used for objective measurement for the quality of nursing care must be developed.

  • PDF

병원 영양부서 평가지표에 대한 중요도-수행도 분석 (Importance-Performance Analysis of Evaluation Indicators in Hospital Nutrition Department)

  • 이주은
    • 대한영양사협회학술지
    • /
    • 제18권4호
    • /
    • pp.326-343
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study has attempted to collect actual spot's opinions and analyze importance-performance of indicators for the evaluation of hospital nutrition department. The results of this research were as follows: first, the average score of self-estimated performance was 3.75 based on a 5-point scale. The degrees of importance of hospital foodservice and nutrition department management were in the range of 3.71~4.85 out of 5.0 and the mean importance degree score was 4.37. Second, the average score of self-estimated performance in each category was significantly higher in the case of general special hospital compared to general hospital. Especially average performance score of nutrition management in the general special hospital was higher than that of general hospital (P<0.001). The average performance score of the hospital with more beds was significantly higher than that with less beds. Contract managed hospital's score was significantly higher than that of self-operated hospital in two categories, "facilities management" and "nutrition management" (P<0.05, P<0.01). In foodservice and nutrition management of task-separated hospitals, the average performance scores were significantly higher than those of not-separated hospitals (P<0.01, P<0.001). Third, according to the importance-performance analysis of recognition about indicators for the hospital nutrition department's operations evaluation, 'foodservice facilities management' and 'foodservice sanitation management' were in 'doing great', 'nutritional management' and 'operational management' were in 'low priority', and 'other foodservice management' was in 'overdone'. In conclusion, there's a need for institutional specific standards of sanitation for Korean hospital foodservice.

OECD 농업환경지표와 정책연계 방안 (Directions for Linkages between Policy Measures and the OECD Agricultural Environmental Indicators)

  • 김창길;김태영
    • 한국환경농학회지
    • /
    • 제24권3호
    • /
    • pp.303-313
    • /
    • 2005
  • Agricultural environmental indicators (AEIs) are useful tool for evaluating environmental performance induced by agri-environmental policy measures. General and specific criteria have been set to assess the linkages between policy measures and environmental states. In addition, a number of specific AEIs such as nutrient balance indicators and farm management indicators have been posit to review environmental performance associated with agri-environmental policy measures. The proposed environmental subjects encompass soil quality, qualities of underground and surface water, water resource preservation, species and genetic diversity, diversity for wildlife habitats, and agricultural landscapes. The developed AEIs may contribute to establishment or adjustment of environmental targets and ex-ante or ex-post evaluation for environmental performance associated with policy measures. In addition, the AEIs may be useful to consider introduction of new agri-environmental measures and enhance policy efficiency by assessing environmental performance, considering specific locality, and harmonizing support measures.

온라인 정보원의 유형별 신뢰지수 및 신뢰성 평가요인 (Confidence Indicators and Evaluation Factors of Credibility According to the Types of Online Information)

  • 김영기
    • 정보관리학회지
    • /
    • 제27권1호
    • /
    • pp.7-24
    • /
    • 2010
  • 본 연구는 온라인 정보원을 12개 유형으로 범주화한 다음 전국적 규모의 대규모 온라인 설문조사를 통해, 온라인 정보의 유형별 신뢰도 실태조사 및 신뢰지수의 도출, 그리고 온라인 정보의 유형별 신뢰성 평가요인에 대해 분석한 것이다. 본 연구 결과 드러난 몇 가지 중요한 사실은 다음과 같다. 우선 온라인 정보원의 유형별 '신뢰지수'는 뉴스 사이트에 게시된 정보(72.553), 금융기관(68.894), 정부기관(67.938), 카페(66.464), 포털(65.001), 집단지성(63.489), 비영리기관(63.392), 일반기업(59.789), 블로그(59.066), 온라인 토론방(55.609), 전자상거래 사이트(55.118), 미니홈피(50.695)의 순으로 나타났다. 다음으로 유형별 온라인 정보원의 신뢰성 평가 요인에 대한 분석에서, 전체적으로 보아 '널리 알려진 웹 사이트이다'는 요인은 온라인 정보원 정보원의 유형에 관계없이 대부분의 범주에서 신뢰성 평가를 위한 주된 요인이 되고 있으며, 카페나 블로그, 미니홈피, 토론방, 집단지성 등의 신뢰성 평가에는 게시된 글의 조회 수나 댓글 등과 같은 다른 이용자의 의견이, 그리고 금융기관이나 일반기업, 정부기관이나 비영리기관 등은 해당 기관의 평판이 신뢰성 평가의 주된 요인이 되고 있음을 알 수 있었다.

중풍환자의 화열변증 진단지표에 관한 연구 (Study on the Diagnostic Indicators of Fire-heat Pattern Identification in Stroke Patients)

  • 이정섭;고미미;강병갑;김정철;김보영;이인;김윤식;최선미;방옥선
    • 동의생리병리학회지
    • /
    • 제23권2호
    • /
    • pp.499-504
    • /
    • 2009
  • The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic indicators which are used for the identification of fire-heat pattern in stroke patients. For evaluation of diagnostic indicator, we analyzed the indicators which are composed of symptoms and signs collected from stroke patients based on the clinical records using case report form (CRF). Patients had a first-ever stroke within 1 month after the onset of stroke. Pattern identification was performed and decided by two independent physicians. Two patient groups that consist of fire-heat pattern and the other patterns were compared to isolate important indicators affecting the fire-heat pattern identification of stroke patients. The 8 indicators among 16 fire-heat pattern indicators were significantly more frequent compared with non fire-heat pattern group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that 5 indicators among fire-heat indicators were significantly sensitive indicators being capable of identification of fire-heat pattern. But two of them was from the indicators of dampness-phlegm pattern and yin deficiency pattern. Therefore, further studies are required for the development of Korean standard indicators of Fire-heat pattern identification.

제품안전유공기관 평가지표개발에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for Product Safety and Air Supply Agencies)

  • 굴누라
    • 벤처혁신연구
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.23-31
    • /
    • 2019
  • 본 연구의 주요 목표는 업계에서 제품 안전에 기여하는 조직을 평가하고 선정하기 위한 적절한 지표를 개발하는 것이다. 제품 안전 지표는 제품 안전 활동 및 시스템의 순서에 입력, 프로세스 및 출력을 포함하며, 그 지표들은 측정 가능하고 측정 불가능한 지수의 측면에서 제안된다. 세부 지표는 제품 안전 관리, 제품 안전을 위한 노력, 제품 안전성능 등 3가지 부분으로 구성된다. 이 지표들은 시스템 및 제품 안전의 관리 능력의 차이로 인해 기업 규모(대, 중, 소)별로 항목별로 구분된다. 지표를 합리적으로 얻기 위해 산업분야의 전문가 의견과 VOC를 검토한다. 그리고 직급과 수준(간부 대 노동자)에 따라 구분한다. 지표의 항목은 20개, 점수는 200개로 어느 경우든 동일하다. 지표들은 그의 산업에서 제품 안전의 발전에 기여하는 인력을 선택하는데 유용한 도구로 사용할 수 있다.

차세대 보안리더 양성프로그램의 성과평가 지표 개발 (Deriving Performance Evaluation Indicator of Program for Developing the Next Generation of Top Security Leaders)

  • 박성규;김태성;김진석;유성재
    • 정보보호학회논문지
    • /
    • 제28권2호
    • /
    • pp.501-511
    • /
    • 2018
  • 본 연구의 목적은 논리모형을 기반으로 정보보안 인력양성사업의 성과평가 지표를 개발하는 것이다. 정부지원 정보보안 인력양성사업에 대한 문헌연구를 통해 후보 지표를 도출하고 전문가 대상의 포커스그룹 인터뷰를 통해 후보지표를 검토하였다. 최종 선정된 성과지표의 가중치(중요도) 산정을 위해 AHP 설문조사를 실시하여 성과지표를 개발하였다. 인력양성사업 성과지표는 4개 분야의 18개 지표로 구성하였다.

노인환자의 특성을 고려한 노인요양병원 치유환경 평가지표 (A Study on the Development of the Healing Environment Evaluation Criteria for Elderly Care Hospital focusing on the Elderly Inpatient Characteristics)

  • 전수경;남경숙
    • 한국실내디자인학회논문집
    • /
    • 제26권4호
    • /
    • pp.22-29
    • /
    • 2017
  • This paper investigates the evaluation criteria in order to manage healing environment of long-term care elderly hospital. Elderly hospital evaluation tool developed by Korean Government is used to assess elderly hospital facilities to check the hospital facility and maintain its quality. However, the evaluation indicators and questions mainly focusing on safety indicators. Some questions are too vague for precise evaluation. In this paper, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the present evaluation criteria to establish new assessment tool for precise evaluation. The literature research was conducted tp set up the new evaluation criteria. From this research, we developed an elderly focusing on healing environment checklist for elderly care hospital which contains 7 factors as the primary hierarchy structure (Safety, Accessibility, Amenity, Sensibility, Friendly to nature, Territory, Interaction) and 23 factors as the secondary hierarchy structure. This evaluation criteria will help healthcare facility designers and healthcare organizations to build the healthcare facilities.