• Title/Summary/Keyword: ISO26262

Search Result 73, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

ISO 26262 의 하드웨어 ASIL 정량적 평가 절차

  • Kim, Gi-Yeong;Jang, Jung-Sun
    • Proceedings of the Korean Reliability Society Conference
    • /
    • 2011.06a
    • /
    • pp.271-279
    • /
    • 2011
  • Automotive safety integrity level of hardware components can be achieved by satisfying quantitative and qualitative requirements. Based on ASIL, quantitative requirements are composed of hardware architectural metrics and evaluation of safety goal violations due to random hardware failures in ISO 26262. In this paper, the types of hardware failures will be defined and classified. Based on various metrics related with hardware failures, design essentials to achieve hardware safety integrity will be studied specifically. Issues associated with hardware development and assessment process are presented briefly.

  • PDF

On a Method to Analyze and Verify the Functional Safety of ISO 26262 Based on Systems Engineering Framework (기능안전규격 ISO 26262의 효과적 구현을 위한 시스템공학 기반 요구사항 분석/검증 방법)

  • Lim, Gwan-Taik;Lee, Jae-Chon
    • Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science
    • /
    • v.15 no.3
    • /
    • pp.61-69
    • /
    • 2013
  • According to ISO 26262 (the international standard on functional safety for automotive industry), the functional safety should be considered during the whole automotive systems life cycle from the design phase throughout the production phase. In order to satisfy the standard, the automotive and related industry needs to take appropriate actions while carrying out a variety of development activities. This paper presents an approach to coping with the standard. Analyzing the standard indicates that the safety issues of the automotive systems should be handled with a system's view whereas the conventional approach to solving the issues has been practiced with focus on the component's level. The aforementioned system's view implies that the functional safety shall be incorporated in the system design from both the system's life-cycle view and the hierarchical view for the structure. In light of this, the systems engineering framework can be quite appropriate in the functional safety development and thus has been taken in this paper as a problem solving approach. Of various design issues, the analysis and verification of the safety requirements for functional safety is a key study subject of the paper. Note, in particular, that the conventional FMEA (failure mode effects analysis) and FTA (fault tree analysis) methods seem to be partly relying on the insufficient experience and knowledge of the engineers. To improve this, a systematic method is studied here and the result is applied in the design of an ABS braking system as a case study.

Design and Development of a Functional Safety Compliant Electric Power Steering System

  • Lee, Kyung-Jung;Lee, Ki-Ho;Moon, Chanwoo;Chang, Hyuk-Jun;Ahn, Hyun-Sik
    • Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • v.10 no.4
    • /
    • pp.1915-1920
    • /
    • 2015
  • ISO 26262 is an international standard for the functional safety of electric and electronic systems in vehicles, and this standard has become a major issue in the automotive industry. In this paper, a functional safety compliant electronic control unit (ECU) for an electric power steering (EPS) system and a demonstration purposed EPS system are developed, and a software and hardware structure for a safety critical system is presented. EPS is the most recently introduced power steering technology for vehicles, and it can improve driver’s convenience and fuel efficiency. In conformity with the design process specified in ISO 26262, the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) of an EPS system is evaluated, and hardware and software are designed based on an asymmetric dual processing unit architecture and an external watchdog. The developed EPS system effectively demonstrates the fault detection and diagnostic functions of a functional safety compliant ECU as well as the basic EPS functions.

Establishing of Requirement and Design Development Process for Assuring Quality of Automotive Semiconductor (차량용 반도체의 품질 확보를 위한 사양 및 설계 개발 프로세스 수립)

  • Do, Sungryong;Han, Hyuksoo
    • Journal of KIISE
    • /
    • v.41 no.9
    • /
    • pp.625-632
    • /
    • 2014
  • With the trend of increasing needs for high-technology from customer and tightening regulation on automotive fuel efficiency and safety, application of E/E system has been expanding consistently in automotive industry. Thus, demand for core elements of E/E system has been growing: micro controller, analog IC and ASIC. But, development process of automotive semiconductor hasn't been clearly established in domestic area. This research aims to present a guide and an example for construction of requirement and design development process on semiconductor based on ISO/TS 16949 that is requirement for quality management system, CMMI that has been proven in various area and ISO 26262 widely used methodology for functional safety. It is expected that the result of this research is used as guidance for construction of semiconductor development process.

Evaluation Standard for Safety of Autonomous Cars: UL 4600 (자율주행자동차를 위한 안전성 평가 표준: UL 4600)

  • Lee, Seongsoo;Ihm, Sahng-Hyeog
    • Journal of IKEEE
    • /
    • v.25 no.3
    • /
    • pp.565-570
    • /
    • 2021
  • This paper describes UL 4600, a new international safety standard to ensure safety of autonomous cars. Conventional vehicular safety standards such as ISO 26262 and ISO/PAS 21448 suffer from large limitations to be applied to autonomous cars, but UL 4600 exploits new approaches to be applied to autonomous cars. Conventional standards define various technological aspects to ensure safety and require manufacturers to certify these aspects. On the contrary, UL 4600 requires manufacturer to explain and prove why autonomous cars are safe. In UL 4600, (1) under specific environments where the system is designed to operate with, (2) claims should be defined to guarantee given safety, and (3) arguments should be suggested to satisfy given goals, and (3) evidences should be presented to prove given arguments. UL 4600 is technology-neutral since it does not require specific designs nor technologies. So UL 4600 only requires manufacturers to prove given safety goals regardless of methods and technologies. Also UL 4600 admits various cases of autonomous car field operations into the standard via feedback loop. So UL 4600 effectively maneuvers various dangers unknown at the time of standard establishment.