• Title/Summary/Keyword: ILRT

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.041 seconds

A Study on the Effect of Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Containment Vessel due to the Type A Testing Time (격납건물 ILRT 본시험시간이 시험에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Chang-Soo;Moon, Yong-Sig
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Pressure Vessels and Piping
    • /
    • v.8 no.3
    • /
    • pp.1-6
    • /
    • 2012
  • The containment Integrated Leakage Rate Testing(ILRT) of nuclear power plants in Korea is performed in accordance with NSSC(Nuclear Safety and Security Commission) code 2012-16 and ANSI/ANS 56.8-1994. Nuclear power plants in Korea and the United States are to apply same test criteria, ANSI/ANS 56.8-1994, except type A testing time. NPPs in Korea apply 24 hours according to NSSC code 2012-16, but NPPs in United States apply 8 hours according to 10CFR50 App. J for type A test. So, there are many difficulties in order to perform ILRT in Korea. In this study, I review the impact on the ILRT results and the effect of ILRT due to type A testing time. The future, we will continue study to enhance the test reliability and improve these problems.

Risk Assessment of Integrated Leak Rate Test(ILRT) Extension for Korea Standard Nuclear Power Plant (한국표준형원전의 격납건물종합누설률 시험 주기연장에 대한 리스크 평가)

  • Chi, Moon-Goo;Hwang, Seok-Won;Oh, Ji-Yong
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
    • /
    • v.26 no.5
    • /
    • pp.99-104
    • /
    • 2011
  • An ILRT Interval for a nuclear power plant in Korea was extended from once in five years to once in ten years. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate risk impact for ILRT interval extensions. In this paper, input data were generated for the reference plants, KSNP, using raw data such as meteorological data, population distribution data and source term data. And, using MACCS II code the risk impact assessment was performed based on the two methodologies of NUREG-1493 and NEI Interim Report. The risk impact derived from an ILRT interval extension was identified not to be significant. It is considered to apply this study and results to making an accident management plan and safety goal, and to the field of public acceptance.

Web Monitoring System Development for ILRT (격납건물 누설시험용 웹 모니터링 시스템 개발)

  • Kim, Sung-Chul;Cho, Hyoung-Don;Lee, Dong-Gil
    • Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
    • /
    • 2003.11c
    • /
    • pp.826-829
    • /
    • 2003
  • This paper describes the architecture and development of real-time monitoring system for ILRT (Integrated Leakage Rate Test). Object Oriented approach is used during the analysis and design. The architecture can be spited into two modules. First one is the Interface module, which, takes care of the communication between the server and the clients, and the second module is the Graphical User Interface (GUI) module, which takes care of the GUI in the web browser of the client. The technologies used includes Java, Java Bean and Java Applet. Etc.

  • PDF

Risk Assessment for Abolition of Gross Containment Leak Monitoring System Test in CANDU Design Plant (중수로 원자로건물 총누설감시계통 시험 중지에 따른 리스크 영향 평가)

  • Bae, Yeon-Kyoung;Na, Jang-Hwan;Bahng, Ki-In
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
    • /
    • v.30 no.5
    • /
    • pp.123-130
    • /
    • 2015
  • Wolsong Unit 2,3&4 has been performing a containment integrity test during power operation. This test could impact to the safe operation during test. If an accident occurs during pressure dropping phase, reactor trip can be delayed because of the increased pressure difference which causes a time delay to reach the trip set-point. On the contrary, if an accident occurs during pressure increasing phase, reactor trip could be accelerated because the pressure difference to the trip set-point decrease. Point Lepreau nuclear power plant, which installed GCLMS (Gross Containment Leakage Monitoring System) in 1990, has discontinued the test since 1992 due to these adverse effects. Therefore, we evaluated the risk to obviate the GCLMS test based on PWR's ILRT (Integrated Leak Rate Test) extension methodologies. The results demonstrate that risk increase rate is not high in case of performing only ILRT test at every 5 years instead of doing GCLMS test at every 1.5 years. In addition, the result shows that GCLMS test can be removed on a risk-informed perspective since risk increasement is in acceptable area of regulatory acceptance criteria.