• Title/Summary/Keyword: IBLOCA

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Investigation of PCT Behavior in IBLOCA Counterpart Tests between the ATLAS and LSTF Facilities (중형냉각재상실사고의 PCT에 대한 ATLAS와 LSTF 장치의 대응 실험 검토)

  • Kim, Yeon-Sik;Kang, Kyoung-Ho
    • Journal of Energy Engineering
    • /
    • v.28 no.3
    • /
    • pp.26-33
    • /
    • 2019
  • A comparison of CL 13% and 17% IBLOCA counterpart tests(CPTs) between the ATLAS and LSTF facilities was carried out and the behavior of peak cladding temperatures(PCTs) and related thermal hydraulic phenomena were investigated and discussed. There appeared quite a big difference in PCT behavior between the two CPTs and a further comparison of reactor coolant system design between the two facilities was performed. As a result, there was a difference in fuel alignment plate (FAP) design, e.g., one FAP in ATLAS, a combination of upper core plate and upper end box in LSTF, respectively. The FAP design mainly affects the reflux condensate behavior in IBLOCA tests and any difference in FAP design can be a possible reason for different PCT behavior between the two facilities. It should be a further study to find the reason of different PCT behvior between the two facilites.

Integral effect tests for intermediate and small break loss-of-coolant accidents with passive emergency core cooling system

  • Byoung-Uhn Bae;Seok Cho;Jae Bong Lee;Yu-Sun Park;Jongrok Kim;Kyoung-Ho Kang
    • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • v.55 no.7
    • /
    • pp.2438-2446
    • /
    • 2023
  • To cool down a nuclear reactor core and prevent the fuel damage without a pump-driven active component during any anticipated accident, the passive emergency core cooling system (PECCS) was designed and adopted in an advanced light water reactor, i-POWER. In this study, for a validation of the cooling capability of PECCS, thermal-hydraulic integral effect tests were performed with the ATLAS facility by simulating intermediate and small break loss-of-coolant accidents (IBLOCA and SBLOCA). The test result showed that PECCS could effectively depressurize the reactor coolant system by supplying the safety injection water from the safety injection tanks (SITs). The result pointed out that the safety injection from IRWST should have been activated earlier to inhibit the excessive core heat-up. The sequence of the PECCS injection and the major thermal hydraulic transient during the SBLOCA transient was similar to the result of the IBLOCA test with the equivalent PECCS condition. The test data can be used to evaluate the capability of thermal hydraulic safety analysis codes in predicting IBLOCA and SBLOCA transients under an operation of passive safety system.

Assessment of RELAP5MOD2 Cycle 36.04 using LOFT Intermediate Break Experiment L5-1 (LOFT중형 냉각재 상실 사고 모사 실험 자료 L5-1을 이용한 RELAP5/MOD2 Cycle 36.04 코드 평가)

  • Lee, E.J.;Chung, B.D.;Kim, H.J.
    • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • v.23 no.1
    • /
    • pp.66-80
    • /
    • 1991
  • The LOFT intermediate break experiment L5-1, which simulates 12 inch diameter ECC line break in a typical PWR, has been analyzed using the reactor thermal/hydraulic analysis code RELAP5/MOD2, Cycle 36.04. The base calculation, which modeled the core with single flow channel and two heat structures without using the options of reflood and gap conductance model, has been successfully completed and compared with experimental data. Sensitivity studies were carried out to investigate the effects of nodalization at reactor vessel and core modeling on major thermal hydraulic parameters, especially on peak cladding temperature(PCT). These sensitivity items are : single flow channel and single heat structure (Case A), two flow channel and two heat structures (Case B), reflood option added (Case C) and both reflood and gap conductance options added (Case D). The code, RELAP5/MOD2 Cycle 36.04 with the base modeling, predicted the key parameters of LOFT IBLOCA Test L5-1 better than Cases A,B,C and D. Thus, it is concluded that the single flow channel modeling for core is better than the two flow channel modeling and two heat structure is also better than single heat structure modeling to predict PCT at the central fuel rods. It is, therefore, recommended to use the reflood option and not to use gap conductance option for this L5-1 type IBLOCA.

  • PDF