• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2018.05a
• /
• pp.123-123
• /
• 2018

가뭄은 홍수와 달리 진행속도가 비교적 느리기 때문에 초기에 감지한다면 피해를 최소화 할 수 있다. 국내에서는 가뭄전망을 위해 물리적 기반의 기상-수문연계해석 시스템을 구축하여 월 내지 계절전망을 수행하고 있다. 물리적 기반의 가뭄전망은 수치예보모델의 불확실성을 가지고 있으므로 예보 정확도 개선의 측면에서는 통계적 모델을 같이 활용하는 것이 바람직하다. 최근 국외에서는 통계적 방법인 AI (Artificial Intelligence) 기술을 사용하여 가뭄을 전망하는 연구가 활발히 진행 중이나, 아직까지 국내에서는 관련연구가 미흡한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 ANFIS (Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System) 기반의 댐 유입량 예측 모델을 구축하고 SRI (Standardized Runoff Index)를 활용하여 수문학적 가뭄전망을 수행하였다. 대상유역은 국내 주요 다목적댐이 위치한 충주댐 유역과 소양강댐 유역을 선정하였다. 수문 및 기상자료는 국토 교통부 및 기상청의 관측 댐 유입량, 관측 강수량, 관측 기온 및 장기기상예보 자료를 사용하였다. ANFIS 모델 구축을 위한 훈련 및 보정기간과 검정기간은 각각 1987~2010년과 2011~2016년을 선정하였다. 수문학적 가뭄전망은 지속기간 3개월의 1개월 전망 SRI3를 활용하였으며, SRI3는 관측유입량과 예측유입량을 결합하여 산정하였다. 댐 예측유입량 및 수문학적 가뭄전망의 정확도 평가를 위해 상관계수, 평균제곱근오차를 활용하였다. 댐 예측유입량 평가 결과 예측값과 관측값의 상관계수가 높게 나타났으며, 평균제곱근오차는 낮아 예측성이 뛰어났다. SRI3의 경우 관측값과 예측값의 가뭄발생시기가 유사하여 가뭄을 적절하게 반영하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 통계적 기반의 수문학적 가뭄전망기법을 개발하였다는 측면에서 의의가 있으며, 향후 물리적 기반의 가뭄전망정보와 결합한다면 보다 실효성이 향상될 것으로 기대된다.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.55 no.10
• /
• pp.761-774
• /
• 2022

Accurate hydrologic prediction is essential to analyze the effects of drought, flood, and climate change on flow rates, water quality, and ecosystems. Disentangling the uncertainty of the hydrological model is one of the important issues in hydrology and water resources research. Hydrologic data assimilation (DA), a technique that updates the status or parameters of a hydrological model to produce the most likely estimates of the initial conditions of the model, is one of the ways to minimize uncertainty in hydrological simulations and improve predictive accuracy. In this study, the two ensemble-based sequential DA techniques, ensemble Kalman filter, and particle filter are comparatively analyzed for the daily discharge simulation at the Yongdam catchment using airGRdatassim. The results showed that the values of Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) were improved from 0.799 in the open loop simulation to 0.826 in the ensemble Kalman filter and to 0.933 in the particle filter. In addition, we analyzed the effects of hyper-parameters related to the data assimilation methods such as precipitation and potential evaporation forcing error parameters and selection of perturbed and updated states. For the case of forcing error conditions, the particle filter was superior to the ensemble in terms of the KGE index. The size of the optimal forcing noise was relatively smaller in the particle filter compared to the ensemble Kalman filter. In addition, with more state variables included in the updating step, performance of data assimilation improved, implicating that adequate selection of updating states can be considered as a hyper-parameter. The simulation experiments in this study implied that DA hyper-parameters needed to be carefully optimized to exploit the potential of DA methods.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.51 no.10
• /
• pp.905-916
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the climate change impact on watershed hydrology and flow duration in Geum River basin ($9,645.5km^2$) especially by extreme scenarios. The rainfall related extreme index, STARDEX (STAtistical and Regional dynamical Downscaling of EXtremes) was adopted to select the future extreme scenario from the 10 GCMs with RCP 8.5 scenarios by four projection periods (Historical: 1975~2005, 2020s: 2011~2040, 2050s: 2041~2070, 2080s: 2071~2100). As a result, the 5 scenarios of wet (CESM1-BGC and HadGEM2-ES), normal (MPI-ESM-MR), and dry (INM-CM4 and FGOALS-s2) were selected and applied to SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) hydrological model. The wet scenarios showed big differences comparing with the normal scenario in 2080s period. The 2080s evapotranspiration (ET) of wet scenarios varied from -3.2 to +3.1 mm, the 2080s total runoff (TR) varied from +5.5 to +128.4 mm. The dry scenarios showed big differences comparing with the normal scenario in 2020s period. The 2020s ET for dry scenarios varied from -16.8 to -13.3 mm and the TR varied from -264.0 to -132.3 mm respectively. For the flow duration change, the CFR (coefficient of flow regime, Q10/Q355) was altered from +4.2 to +10.5 for 2080s wet scenarios and from +1.7 to +2.6 for 2020s dry scenarios. As a result of the flow duration analysis according to the change of the hydrological factors of the Geum River basin applying the extreme climate change scenario, INM-CM4 showed suitable scenario to show extreme dry condition and FGOALS-s2 showed suitable scenario for the analysis of the drought condition with large flow duration variability. HadGEM2-ES was evaluated as a scenario that can be used for maximum flow analysis because the flow duration variability was small and CESM1-BGC was evaluated as a scenario that can be applied to the case of extreme flood analysis with large flow duration variability.