• 제목/요약/키워드: Hospital Readmission

검색결과 94건 처리시간 0.019초

흉통환자의 관상동맥중재술 시행 여부에 따른 건강행위 및 건강지표 비교 - 간호정보조사지와 전자의무기록 분석- (Comparison of Health Behaviors and Health Indices According to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chest Pain -Analysis of Nursing Information Chart and Electronic Medical Record-)

  • 권미수;이숙정
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제19권12호
    • /
    • pp.279-288
    • /
    • 2019
  • 본 연구는 흉통이 발생되어 관상동맥조영술을 실시한 후 재입원한 대상자의 관상동맥중재술 시행 여부에 따른 건강행위와 건강지표의 차이를 종단적으로 비교하고자 수행되었고, 2010년 1월부터 2017년 12월까지 일개병원에서 247명의 흉통발생자의 간호정보조사지와 전자의무기록을 분석한 2차 자료 분석연구이다. 대상자는 관상동맥중재술 비시행자와 시행자로 구분하여 병원 1차 입원 시점과 재입원 시점에서 흡연, 음주, 수면장애등 건강행위와 혈압과 혈중 지질 수치등 건강지표를 측정하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS 24.0를 사용하여 분석하였고, 연구 결과, 초기 입원시에는 관상동맥중재술 시행자와 비시행자간 건강행위와 건강지표에는 유의한 차이가 없었으나, 재입원시에는 관상동맥중재술 시행자가 비시행자에 비해 흡연과 지질 수치에 있어서 유의하게 건강한 양상을 나타내었다. 관상동맥중재술 비시행자의 경우 관상동맥협착의 위험이 많은 환자임에도 불구하고 흡연률이 높았고, 전체 대상자중 60%가 퇴원후 6-12개월 사이에 흉통으로 재입원하여, 흉통환자에게 의학적 치료와 더불어 건강행위를 도모하는 지속적인 통합관리가 필요함을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구의 의의는 관상동맥중재술 실시 여부에 따른 건강행위와 건강지표를 종단적으로 비교하여 관상동맥질환자와 위험환자의 건강행위의 중요성을 확인한 것이다.

Comparison of the Outcomes between Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged above 80

  • Lee, Jeong-Woo;Kim, Jihoon;Jung, Sung-Ho;Chung, Cheol Hyun;Lee, Jae Won
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제50권4호
    • /
    • pp.255-262
    • /
    • 2017
  • Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been suggested as a less invasive treatment for high-risk patients with aortic valve disease. I n this study, we compared the outcomes of conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and TAVR in elderly patients aged over 80. Methods: A total of 108 patients aged 80 years or older who underwent isolated AVR (n=35) or TAVR (n=73) from 2010 through 2015 at Asan Medical Center were identified. Early and late clinical outcomes, including echocardiographic findings, were evaluated in both groups. The mean follow-up duration was $766.4{\pm}528.7days$ in the AVR group and $755.2{\pm}546.6days$ in the TAVR group, and the average timing of the last follow-up echocardiography was at $492.6{\pm}512.5days$ in the AVR group and $515.7{\pm}526.8days$ in the TAVR group. Results: The overall early mortality was 2.8% (0 of 35, 0% in the AVR group vs. 3 of 73, 4.1% in the TAVR group). Permanent pacemaker insertion was significantly more common in the TAVR group (p=0.010). Renal failure requiring dialysis and new-onset atrial fibrillation was more frequent and the length of hospital stay was longer in the AVR group; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. In the TAVR group, 14 patients (19.2%) were rehospitalized due to cardiac problems, and 13 patients (17.8%) had developed significant paravalvular leakage by the time of the last follow-up echocardiography. Conclusion: TAVR could be a good alternative to conventional surgical AVR in elderly patients. However, TAVR has several shortcomings, such as frequent significant paravalvular leakage or readmission, which should be considered in decision-making.

Effectiveness of a Clinical Pathway for Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Operation on Clinical Outcomes and Costs

  • Jeong Hyun Park;Danbee Kang;Seok Jin Nam;Jeong Eon Lee;Seok Won Kim;Jonghan Yu;Byung Joo Chae;Se Kyung Lee;Jai Min Ryu;Yeon Hee Park;Mangyeong Lee;Juhee Cho
    • 한국의료질향상학회지
    • /
    • 제30권1호
    • /
    • pp.120-131
    • /
    • 2024
  • Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing a clinical pathways (CPs) on the clinical outcomes and costs of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who were newly diagnosed with primary breast cancer at the Samsung Medical Center between 2014 and 2019 (N=8482; 2931 patients in the pre-path and 5551 patients in the post-path). Clinical outcomes included reoperation during hospitalization, readmission, and emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge. The cost data for each unit were obtained from an activity-based management accounting system. We performed an interrupted time series analysis. Results: The post-path period showed a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) than the pre-path period (6.3 days in pre-path vs. 5.0 days in post-path; -1.3 days' difference; p=.001), and fewer reoperations during hospitalization and within 30 days after discharge than the pre-path period. After adjusting for inflation rates and relative value scores, the model demonstrated savings of $146 per patient in the post-path for total costs, and $537 per patient for patient out-of-pocket costs (p=.001). Conclusion: CPs can help reduce costs without compromising the quality of care by reducing the number of reoperations, readmissions, and complications.

가정간호 서비스 질 평가를 위한 도구개발연구 (A basic research for evaluation of a Home Care Nursing Delivery System)

  • 김모임;조원정;김의숙;김성규;장순복;유호신
    • 가정∙방문간호학회지
    • /
    • 제6권
    • /
    • pp.33-45
    • /
    • 1999
  • The purpose of this study was to develop a basic framework and criteria for evaluation of quality care provided to patients with the attributes of disease in the home care nursing field, and to provide measurement tools for home health care in the future. The study design was a developmental study for evaluation of hospital-based HCN(home care nursing) in Korea. The study process was as follows: a home care nursing study team of College of Nursing. Yonsei University reviewed the nursing records of 47 patients who were enrolled at Yonsei University Medical Center Home Care Center in March, 1995. Twenty-five patients were insured at that time, were selected from 47 patients receiving home care service for study feasibility with six disease groups; Caesarean Section (C/S), simple nephrectomy, Liver cirrhosis(LC), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD), Lung cancer or cerebrovascular accident(CVA). In this study, the following items were selected : First step : Preliminary study 1. Criteria and items were selected on the basis of related literature on each disease area. 2. Items were identified by home care nurses. 3. A physician in charge reviewed the criteria and content of selected items. 4. Items were revised through preliminary study offered to both HCN patients and discharged patients from the home care center. Second step : Pretest 1. To verify the content of the items, a pretest was conducted with 18 patients of which there were three patients in each of the six selected disease groups. Third step : Test of reliability and validity of tools 1. Using the collected data from 25 patients with either cis, Simple nephrectomy, LC, COPD, Lung cancer, or CVA. the final items were revised through a panel discussion among experts in medical care who were researchers, doctors, or nurses. 2. Reliability and validity of the completed tool were verified with both inpatients and HCN patients in each of field for researches. The study results are as follows: 1. Standard for discharge with HCN referral The referral standard for home care, which included criteria for discharge with HCN referral and criteria leaving the hospital were established. These were developed through content analysis from the results of an open-ended questionnaire to related doctors concerning characteristic for discharge with HCN referral for each of the disease groups. The final criteria was decided by discussion among the researchers. 2. Instrument for measurement of health statusPatient health status was measured pre and post home care by direct observation and interview with an open-ended questionnaire which consisted of 61 items based on Gorden's nursing diagnosis classification. These included seven items on health knowledge and health management, eight items on nutrition and metabolism, three items on elimination, five items on activity and exercise, seven items on perception and cognition, three items on sleep and rest, three items on self-perception, three items on role and interpersonal relations, five items on sexuality and reproduction, five items on coping and stress, four items on value and religion, three items on family. and three items on facilities and environment. 3. Instrument for measurement of self-care The instrument for self-care measurement was classified with scales according to the attributes of the disease. Each scale measured understanding level and practice level by a Yes or No scale. Understanding level was measured by interview but practice level was measured by both observation and interview. Items for self-care measurement included 14 for patients with a CVA, five for women who had a cis, ten for patients with lung cancer, 12 for patients with COPD, five for patients with a simple nephrectomy, and 11 for patients with LC. 4. Record for follow-up management This included (1) OPD visit sheet, (2) ER visit form, (3) complications problem form, (4) readmission sheet. and (5) visit note for others medical centers which included visit date, reason for visit, patient name, caregivers, sex, age, time and cost required for visit, and traffic expenses, that is, there were open-end items that investigated OPD visits, emergency room visits, the problem and solution of complications, readmissions and visits to other medical institution to measure health problems and expenditures during the follow up period. 5. Instrument to measure patients satisfaction The satisfaction measurement instrument by Reisseer(1975) was referred to for the development of a tool to measure patient home care satisfaction. The instrument was an open-ended questionnaire which consisted of 11 domains; treatment, nursing care, information, time consumption, accessibility, rapidity, treatment skill, service relevance, attitude, satisfaction factors, dissatisfaction factors, overall satisfaction about nursing care, and others. In conclusion, Five evaluation instruments were developed for home care nursing. These were (1)standard for discharge with HCN referral. (2)instrument for measurement of health status, (3)instrument for measurement of self-care. (4)record for follow-up management, and (5)instrument to measure patient satisfaction. Also, the five instruments can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the service to assure quality. Further research is needed to increase the reliability and validity of instrument through a community-based HCN evaluation.

  • PDF