• 제목/요약/키워드: Heaven-Human-Nature-Order

검색결과 34건 처리시간 0.022초

『동의수세보원(東醫壽世保元)』과 『격치고(格致藁)』의 사상구조(四象構造)에 대(對)한 고찰(考察) (A Study for Sasang Structure about 『Dongyi Suse Bowon』 and『Gyukchigo』)

  • 김경수;이수경;이의주;고병희;송일병
    • 사상체질의학회지
    • /
    • 제16권2호
    • /
    • pp.32-43
    • /
    • 2004
  • 1. Objectives This paper was tried to find out Dong-Mu's recognition systemfor Sasang Structure about "Dongyi Suse Bowon" and "Gyukchigo" 2. Methods The study was researched through comparative studying in a structural manner between "Gyukchigo" 's Affairs-Mind-Body-Objects(事心身物) and "Dongyi Suse Bowon" 's Heaven-Human-Nature-Order(天人性命). 3. Results and Conculusions "Gyukchigo" 's Affairs-Mind-Body-Objects(事心身物) should be understood as Dong-Mu's change process of thinking scheme before writing the book of "Dongyi Suse Bowon" and it is somewhat difficult to make a connected attachment in a lump between "Dongyi Suse Bowon" 's Heaven-Human-Nature-Order(天人性命) and "Gyukchigo" 's Affairs-Mind-Body-Objects(事心身物). Just "Dongyi Suse Bowon" 's Heaven-Human-Nature-Order(天人性命) can be understood as a new recognition systemto encompass" Gyukchigo" 's Affairs-Mind-Body-Objects(事心身物).

  • PDF

동무(東武) 사상의학(四象醫學)의 철학적(哲學的) 의의(意義)와 의학적(醫學的) 확장(擴張) (Study on Philosophy and Medical meaning of Sassang Constitutional Medicine)

  • 노상용;고흥
    • 동의생리병리학회지
    • /
    • 제20권3호
    • /
    • pp.503-515
    • /
    • 2006
  • This research is purposed to find Dong-mu's thought on 'philosophy and medical interrelationship' in his writings. It was researched with Dong-mu's chief medical writings such as ${\ulcorner}$Gyukchigo(格致藁)${\lrcorner}$ , ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Soose Bowon(東醫壽世保元) ${\lrcorner}$ , ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Soose Bowon Sasang Chobongyun(東醫壽世保元四象草本卷)${\lrcorner}$ , ${\ulcorner}$Dong-mu's posthumos work(東武遺稿)${\lrcorner}$ Dong-mu describe his philosophy conception with the system of The Book of change(周易). But he changes the meaning of Taegeuk(太極), LangYui(兩儀), Sasang(四象) on the respect of human being. Gyuchigo(格致藁) can be understood as social behavior pattern of Sasang constitute. From ${\ulcorner}$Gyukchigo(格致藁)${\lrcorner}$ to The theory of Sung-Meung(性命論), It is focused on Nature(性) and Order(命). Affairs- Mind - Body-Objects(事心身物) was distributed at Heaven-Human -Nature-Order(天人性命) on the respect of Human Moral. In the respect of Form-Use(體用), It is assigned to Form(體) and metaphysical philosophy. After The theory of Sa-Dan(四端論) in ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Soose Bowon(東醫壽世保元) ${\lrcorner}$, It is focused on Nature-Emotion(性情). Affairs - Mind - Body - Objects(事心身物)is distributed at Heaven-Human -Nature-Order (天人性命) on the respect of human internal mind. In the respect of Form-Use(體用), It is assigned to Use(用) and Physical science. Sasang Constitution can be expanded to Eight COnstitution in the respect of dominant position among Nature(性) and Emotion(情).

동무(東武)의 인간론(人間論)에서 접근한 사상구조(四象構造) 분석(分析) (The Analysis on Lee Je-Ma's Sasang Structure Which Focused on Human)

  • 강태곤;박성식
    • 사상체질의학회지
    • /
    • 제19권3호
    • /
    • pp.1-9
    • /
    • 2007
  • 1. Objectives This Study is to comprehend the Sasang structure created by Lee Je-Ma. 2. Methods We analyzed $\ulcorner$Dongyisusebowon(東醫壽世保元)$\lrcorner$ & $\ulcorner$Gyukchigo(格致藁)$\lrcorner$ which contain the contents of 'Heaven-Human-Narure-Order(天人性命), and 'Affairs-Mind-Body-Objects(事心身物)'. 3. Results and Conclusions 1) The structure of Sasang is divided into two, which are 'Talent(才能的 部分)-Action(行爲的 部分)' and 'Self examination(正己的 部分)-Perception of mankind(知人的 部分)'. 2) 'Talent-Action' is the ontological structure of the Sasang. 'Self examination-Perception of mankind' is the administrative structure of the Sasang. 3) The ontological structure of Sasang is essential concept which is explaining the existence of mankind. An administrative strucrure of Sasang is operative concept which makes human as oneself. 4) It is necessary to have the insight to organize these four parts into the one organic whole if one has to comprehend the profound meaning of Sasang. 5) Four parts of Sasang structure could be matched as 'Heaven(天)-Affairs(事), Human(人)-Objects(物)', 'Nature (性)-Mind(心), Order(命)-Body(身)'.

  • PDF

주돈이와 권근의 천인합일사상 비교 - 『태극도설』과 『입학도설』을 중심으로 - (The Comparison of 'Oneness between Heaven and Man(天人合一)' thoughts between Zhoudunyi(周敦頤) and Kwonkun(權近) - Focusing on "Taijirushuo (太極圖說)" and "Ip-Hak-Do-Seol(入學圖說)")

  • 허광호
    • 동양고전연구
    • /
    • 제66호
    • /
    • pp.251-276
    • /
    • 2017
  • 이 논문은 주돈이가 "태극도설"에서 제시한 천인합일사상과 권근이 "입학도설"에서 제시한 천인심성합일사상을 비교하여 그 차이를 규명하고자 한 시도이다. 수양론 중심의 실천적인 사상으로 발전해 온 천인합일사상은 송대 주돈이가 "태극도설"에서 형이상학적 우주론과 인성론으로 정리하면서 철학적 깊이와 논리적 체계를 갖추게 된다. 그는 천(天)에 상응하는 무극(無極)의 개념을 세워 무극-태극-음양-오행-인간-만물의 일원적 우주론을 제시한다. 그의 우주론은 만물의 창조자인 천(天)은 피조자인 인간과 명(命)과 성(性)을 매개로하여 결부되는 합일의 관계라는 인식이다. 따라서 본성을 회복하여 자기의 본성이 천명(天命)임을 알면 곧 천인합일이 실현되고 성인도 될 수 있다고 말한다. 주돈이의 사상은 약 120년 뒤 주희에게 와서 이기론 으로 융합된 주자학으로 집대성 된다. 이에 따라 주돈이는 주자학의 시조로 후대에 평가된다. 고려 말 권근은 그의 "입학도설"에서 천인심성합일사상을 제시한다. 권근의 천인심성합일사상은 그의 스승인 이색의 천인무간사상에 주자학적 요소를 가미하여 내 마음의 작용과 리(理)가 일체라고 정리함으로써 논리적 정합성을 이룬다. 주돈이가 주로 우주와 만물의 생성원리에 대해 관심을 기진 것에 반해 권근은 주로 심성론적 관점에서 천(天), 인(人), 심(心), 성(性)에 대해 관심을 가진다. 또한 경(敬)중심의 수양으로 천인심성합일을 이룰 수 있다고 제시한다. 권근의 이런 사상은 조선조 주자학이 심성론 중심으로 발전하는 단초가 되었다. 그의 사상은 약 150년후 퇴계 이황에게 와서 사단칠정론과 경(敬)사상으로 집대성 된다. 그러나 주돈이와 달리 권근은 그의 학문적 업적에도 불구하고 제대로 평가 받지 못하고 있다.

이제마의 도덕.성명론과 사상의학적 맥락 연구 (Study on the Concepts of Lee Jema's Way.Virtue.Nature.Imperative and the Contexts between Sasang Constitutional Medicine)

  • 노상용;고흥
    • 동의생리병리학회지
    • /
    • 제19권5호
    • /
    • pp.1137-1141
    • /
    • 2005
  • This paper is written in order to investigate how Lee Je-Ma changed traditional Zhu Xi's philosophical view on Way(Tao; 道) Virtue(De: 德) Nature(Xing;性) and Imperative(Ming; 命), which was general concepts of his contemporary age, to practical philosophy and created new medical theories of Sasang(4 symbols) science from it. Lee emphasized the true thing which is able to be done in one's living not the concepts of Sasang. So he induced the concepts of Way and Virtue from the easy and simple way(易簡之道) in the Classic of Changes(I'Ching) for the purpose of practice by anyone. Because Nature and Imperative are derived from Way and Virtue in the context logically, human life is virtual in itself, so the substance of Nature and Imperative became equal with Way and Virtue. Herein the names and concepts of original 'Sasang' were substituted to Business(事), Mind(心), Body(身), Thing(物) which is able to be directly related with human being in his daily life. And he explained variously about the responses of Mind and Body of individuals onto Business and Thing. So it could be applied in medical aspects like emotional, symptomatical, characteristic features. Conclusively man is virtual being, so Nature and Imperative in the level of Human being are based on Way and Virtue in the level of Heaven. For that reason the new concepts of Sasang Business. Mind. Body Thing or Heaven. Human. Nature and Imperative were proposed.

주단계(朱丹溪) 상화론(相火論)의 군화(君火) 상화(相火)의 개념에 대한 고찰 (Study on the Concept of Monarch-fire(君火) and Ministerial-fire(相火) in Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪)'s Ministerial-fire Theory(相火論))

  • 이용범
    • 대한한의학원전학회지
    • /
    • 제27권4호
    • /
    • pp.29-38
    • /
    • 2014
  • Objectives : In ministerial-fire theory(相火論) of Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪), the meanings of monarch-fire(君火) and ministerial-fire(相火) described in papers published nowadays are not the same. Therefore, it is necessary to rebuild a clear concept. Methods : To understand the relationships among 'heaven(天)'-'human(人)' and 'name(名)'-'position(位)', the core concept of the ministerial-fire theory(相火論) of Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪), I examined the relationships between 'heaven(天)' and 'human(人)' in Neo-Confucianism(性理學) of Song(宋) Dynasty and reviewed the notes of Wang Bing(王冰) which were quoted by Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪) to set the concept of monarch-fire(君火) and ministerial-fire(相火). I studied relevant texts. Results : In ministerial-fire theory(相火論) of Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪), monarch-fire(君火) is perceived as being from greed(人欲) that can cause hyperactivity(妄動) of ministerial-fire(相火), whereas ministerial-fire(相火) is perceived as being able to control monarch-fire(君火) by following the orders from heaven. This point of view is different from the past which recognized monarch-fire (君火) as the owner and ministerial-fire(相火) as the servant. Conclusions : Zhu Dan-Xi(朱丹溪) received the ideological impact of Neo-Confucianism, and accepted the notes of Wang Bing, recognized monarch-fire(君火) as 'name(名)' and ministerial-fire(相火) as 'position(位)', so he voiced the ministerial-fire theory(相火論) that perceived monarch-fire(君火) as fire(火) of the five processes(五行) of human body that came from greed, ministerial-fire(相火) as being in a position to hear the order from the 'heaven(天)' to control monarch-fire(君火). But the concept of ministerial-fire(相火) which he set connoted a confusing meaning of 'nature(性)' and 'way(道)' of Neo-Confucianism. In the later process to solve the problem, life-gate theory(命門學說) was raised, and many researchers had tried to remove the meaning of hyperactivity from the ministerial-fire(相火).

동무 이제마의 사상설(四象說)과 캔 윌버의 사상한(四象限) 일고(一考) (Connection of Dongmu Lee Je-ma's Sa-Sang Theory & Ken Wilber's all-quadrant approach)

  • 허훈
    • 철학연구
    • /
    • 제116권
    • /
    • pp.411-435
    • /
    • 2010
  • 윌버(Ken Wilber, 1949~)는 역사적으로 볼 때 학문적 교류가 활발한 현대가 그 어느 때보다도 세계철학이 가능한 시대임을 강조하며 통합적 접근을 시도한다. 그는 통합적 모델로 향하는 첫 걸음으로 '온 상한' 즉 '사상한(四象限)'을 제시한다. 더 나아가 그의 사상한은 AQAL(All Quadrant, All Level ; 모든 수준, 모든 레벨)로 구체화 되었다. 모든 문제를 뚜렷하게 사분위(四分位)(내부/외부, 단수/복수 혹은 주관/객관, 간주관성/간객관성)로 나누어 보는 사상한의 접근법은 그 응용분야가 확대되어 생태학, 경영, 범죄학, 의료 등등의 분야에 적용되고 있다. 그의 사상한이 갖는 장점은 주관적인 내면[문화적 요소]을 외재적인 실재인 물질[사회 제도]로 환원시켜 버리는 평원(平原)이 지닌 문제점을 해결하고 모든 문제를 포괄적인 관점에서 대안을 모색한다는 데 있다. 시기적으로 앞서는 동무 이제마(1837~1900)의 사상설(四象說)(사심신물(事心身物), 천인성명(天人性命))은 사분위라는 큰 틀로 보면, 내용면에서 윌버의 사상한과 적확(的確)하게 일치한다. '사상학(四象學)' 혹은 '사상의학(四象醫學)'이라고 불리듯이 동무의 저작 전반에 걸쳐 일관되게 나타나는 사상(四象)(사심신물(事心身物))은 우주만물의 구성을 설명하기 위한 기본적인 요소들이다. 천인성명(天人性命)은 사심신물이라는 우주의 사원구조를 인간(人間)(인체(人體))을 중심으로 파악한 결과다. 다시 말해 사상설은 우주와 인간을 윌버식의 포괄적인 관점으로 바라본 것이다. 이미 동무의 사상설은 칼 융(C. G. Jung, 1875~1961)의 심리학과 대비되어 양자간(兩者間)의 이론적 기반을 확인하고 그 적용 범위를 넓혀나가는데 도움을 주고 있다. 동무의 사상설과 윌버의 사상한의 대비(對比) 역시 단순한 유비(類比)에 그치는 것이 아니다. 비교하자면, 동무의 사상설은 윌버의 그것에 비해 의학적(醫學的) 측면(側面)에서는 보다 정교하게 심화되고 구체화된 사상한의 모습을 보여준다. 단지 질병을 바라보는데 그치지 않고 생리(生理) 병리(病理) 현상의 원인과 그것이 도출되는 과정을 사상한을 통해 설명하고 있다.

한의학과 불교의 생태학적 고찰 (Study of ecology on Buddhism and the traditional korea medicine)

  • 구병수
    • 동의신경정신과학회지
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.1-10
    • /
    • 2004
  • 1. It is man that plays a important role in doing harm to ecology. So human ought to understand ecology and develop their mind considering a ecology through practicing Noble eightfold Path(入正道) austerities. 2. With a view of traditional Korean medicine, it is accomplished the circulation between human and heaven and earth by Qi. And then these are inter-transformed essence, Qi and spirit and carry out unification themselves by coexisting with university. 3. I consider 'Well-being' is man-centered thinking countering to the view of ecology. Then the health of body and spirit is accomplished through the life harmonizing with nature incidentally. 4. It is need for realizing that man and nature have the mercy of Buddha in order to purify a ecosystem and our human society through practicing austerities and meditation. 5. Spirit is regarded as the important thing on Buddhism and traditional Korean medicine based on Orientalism. The purification of human mind is very important for maintaining of a ecosystem through practicing austerities and meditation.

  • PDF

주자학과 대순사상의 수양론 비교 연구 (The Comparative Research on the Theory of Self-cultivation in Neo-Confucianism and Daesoon Thought)

  • 이광주
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제24_2집
    • /
    • pp.231-270
    • /
    • 2015
  • This thesis examined Chu Hsi's self-cultivation theory as the representative theory of cultivation in Confucianism, while juxtaposing it to self-cultivation theory in Daesoon thought, concentrating on its similarity and difference. Neo-Confucianism is a scholarship which has wielded a tremendous influence upon East Asia, while functioning as an official scholarship for long period up to Yuan, Ming, and Ching period, after achieving its synthesis by Chu Hsi. After 13th century, Neo-Confucianism has been a representative academic system in Confucianism, and self-cultivation theory was in its center. It suggested various virtues that classical scholars have to equip to fulfill the sainthood and the politics of royal road. The self-cultivation theory of Chu Hsi was developed upon the basis of the theory 'Li-Qi' and the theory of mind. Here, the practice of Geokyung(morally awakened state with a reverent spirit in every moment) and Gyeokmul-tsiji(reaching into the utmost knowledge through investigation of things) formed a nucleus of Chu Hsi's self-cultivation theory. While Geokyung was to reveal one's true nature through cultivation of mind, Gyeokmul-tsiji was to demonstrate the complete use of mind's essence and function. Chu Hsi's self-cultivation theory attempted to realize the unity of heaven and man, and through cultivating self and governing people, it also tried to achieve its ideal of the society of Great Union(Daedong). Daesoon Thought is originated from Sangjenim who has descended to this world as a human being called Jeungsan. He went on his circuit to rectify the disorder of heaven and earth for 9 years to rectify the Three worlds of heaven, earth and human being which were faced with total annihilation due to its rule of mutual conflict, while creating an earthly paradise. Respecting the will of Sangjenim, Dojunim established the foundation of Do through launching 'Meukeukdo' and setting tenet, creed and object so that the cultivators (Doins) could believe and respect the truth of Sangje's great itineration (Daesoon). Among those, the two components of creed, which are four fundamental principles and the three fundamental attitudes are of great account as precept and cardinal point. Through this means, the cultivators of Daesoonjinrihoe aspire to guard against self-deception through transforming the human spirit, to realize earthly immortality through renewing human beings, and to create an earthly paradise through transforming the world. This thesis attempted to compare and analyze the theory of self-cultivation in Neo-Confucianism and Daesoon Thought in the aspect of ground, method, and object of cultivation. First, as for the ground of cultivation, the doctrines of Chu-tzu and Daesoon thought place the essence of cultivation on 'heaven'. Yet, whereas the former postulates Taekeuk (the Great Ultimate) as a principle as well as the heaven of a natural order, Daesoon thought postulates Sangenim as the heaven of superintendence as well as the heaven of a natural order, signified as its equation of Daesoon with circle, along with the unity of Meukeuk (Endlessness) and Taegeuk (the Great Ultimate). Further, the doctrine of Chu-zhu and Daesoon thought is identical in the point that both thoughts see mind as the subject of cultivation, while trying to restore a pure essence. Nevertheless, whereas Neo-Confucianism intends to give scope to ability of the complete use of mind's essence and function, Daesoon Thought sees mind as the essence which is used by spiritual beings and as an organ that heaven, earth and human being rely upon as the center of the universe. In the aspect of method of cultivation, the doctrine of Chuzhu lays emphasis on the rational factor in that it brightens its 'myung-deoki'(bright inner virtue),' while trying to correspond to the law of heaven on the basis of 'Geokyung' and 'Gyeokmul-tsiji.' On the contrary, Daesoon thought lays much emphasis on faith factor in that it aspires for human perfection based on the restoration of conscience by cultivating Daesoonjinri with sincerity, reverence and faith along with 'quieting the heart-mind', 'quieting the body', 'respecting the God of the Ninth Heaven', and 'observing ritual practice on the basis of the faith in Sangjenim. Yet, both thoughts have similarities in that cultivation of body forms the basis and that they attempt to realize their ideals through cultivation in daily life while taking 'Guarding against self-deception' as the key method of self-cultivation.' However, the principle of Chu-zhu can be said to be a voluntary and autonomous practice based on scripture of the saint as well as self-reflection. On the other hand, Daesoon thought reveals certain difference in that it combines faith factor with one's self-effort by concentrating on cultivation under the presence of Sangjenim as the object of belief and the spirits of heaven and earth. In the aspect of object of cultivation, both thoughts share similarities in that the saint and the perfected gentleman with a moral virtue as an ideal image of men in both thoughts attempt to realize each of their 'myung-deok' in human nature as a heavenly mandate while respecting morality. Further, they also share similarity in the point that the desirable characters in both thoughts want to participate in harmonious creation and nurturance. Yet, the perfected gentleman with a moral virtue is also characterized by its aim for a new heaven and earth where there is no mutual conflict but mutual beneficence, by promoting the moral influence and virtue of Sangjenim over one's own virtue, while practising the mutual beneficence of all life through harmonious union of divine beings and human beings.

대순진리회의 상생생태론 연구 - 상생의 의미를 중심으로 - (The Sangsaeng Ecological Theory of Daesoon Jinrihoe: Focusing on the Meaning of Sangsaeng)

  • 김귀만
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제48집
    • /
    • pp.375-406
    • /
    • 2024
  • 이 글의 목적은 대순진리회의 생태주의 담론인 '상생생태론'에서 '상생'의 의미를 생태적으로 규정하는 데 있다. 인간을 대상으로 윤리적 측면에서 통용되던 상생이 그 적용 범위를 비인간까지 확장시키는 생태학의 영역에서 어떻게 적용될 수 있는지 상호의존성이라는 생태학의 개념으로 설명한다. 생태학에서의 상호의존성은 개체와 개체 사이에서 발생하는 긍정적, 부정적, 중립적인 관계를 조합하여 경쟁, 포식, 기생, 그리고 공생으로 구분한다. 개체와 개체 사이의 관계가 부정적으로 끝나더라도 생태계에는 긍정적인 영향을 끼칠 수 있으므로 모두 '의존'이라는 개념에 포함된다. 그러나 개체와 개체 사이의 부정적 결말은 원을 발생시킬 수 있고 이러한 상호의존은 상생윤리의 관점에서는 그대로 통용될 수 없다. 따라서 생태적 상생은 긍정적 상호의존의 관계만 해당하거나 혹은 포원이 존재하지 않는 포식, 기생, 경쟁의 관계도 포함될 수 있다. 생태론은 자연과 인간을 분리하지 않고 둘 사이를 통합적으로 이해할 수 있는 관점을 요구한다. 천지생인용인(天地生人用人)이라는 우주관은 우주와 인간, 자연과 인간의 관계를 상호의존적 관점에서 포착할 수 있게 한다. 천지는 자신의 존재 근거를 인간으로 삼았고, 지인은 자연의 법칙을 발견하고 그 배후에 있는 천지의 신성성까지 깨달아 비로소 천지와 인간, 자연과 인간의 깊은 상호의존의 관계가 성립한다. 그러나 근대적 인간이 등장하면서 자연을 짓밟고 신도의 권위를 떨어뜨림으로써 천지와 인간의 상호의존성은 붕괴된다. 해원상생과 보은상생은 천지와 인간, 자연과 인간 사이에 끊어진 상호의존성을 다시잇는 해결책이다. 공부 의례를 통해 해원상생을 실천하는 것은 자연과 인간의 상호의존성을 회복하는 길이다. 수도를 통해 도통에 도달하는 과정이 보은상생의 실천이며 이로써 인간은 생태적 본성을 지닌 인존으로 거듭나 자연과 영원한 상호의존을 누리게 된다. 요컨대 상생생태론에서의 상생은 자연과 인간이 상호의존성을 회복하고 그것을 영원히 지속할 수 있게 만드는 이념이자 실천이다.