• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.107-145
• /
• 2023

The first edition of 'A Standardized Pathology Report for Gastric Cancer' was initiated by the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists and published 17 years ago. Since then, significant advances have been made in the pathologic diagnosis, molecular genetics, and management of gastric cancer (GC). To reflect those changes, a committee for publishing a second edition of the report was formed within the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists. This second edition consists of two parts: standard data elements and conditional data elements. The standard data elements contain the basic pathologic findings and items necessary to predict the prognosis of GC patients, and they are adequate for routine surgical pathology service. Other diagnostic and prognostic factors relevant to adjuvant therapy, including molecular biomarkers, are classified as conditional data elements to allow each pathologist to selectively choose items appropriate to the environment in their institution. We trust that the standardized pathology report will be helpful for GC diagnosis and facilitate large-scale multidisciplinary collaborative studies.

• 대한영상의학회지
• /
• 제82권5호
• /
• pp.1246-1257
• /
• 2021

목적 본 연구의 목적은 두경부암의 종격동 림프절 전이의 예측인자와 영상 소견을 알아보고자 함이다. 대상과 방법 이 연구에서 저자들은 두경부암 환자 중에서 종격동 림프절 전이그룹과 비전이 그룹 사이의 임상 소견 및 질병의 특성(성별, 연령, 원발성 종양 부위, 조직학적 유형, 악성종양에 대한 이전 치료이력, T-, N- 및 M- 단계, 경부 림프절 전이) 들을 비교하였다. 또한 저자들은 전이그룹에서 종격동 림프절 분류에 따라 림프절 전이의 흉부 전산화단층촬영(전이분포와 림프절 최대직경) 및 양전자방출단층촬영/전산화단층촬영(최대 표준섭취계수)의 소견을 평가하였다. 결과 두경부암 환자 470명 중 55명(11.7%)에서 150개의 종격동 station을 포함하는 종격동 림프절 전이가 발견되었다. 하인두암, 재발한 종양, T4, N2/N3, 및 M1 단계는 종격동 림프절 전이의 의미 있는 예측인자로 평가되었다. 종격동 림프절 전이의 가장 흔한 위치는 일측 station 2 (상부기관주위 림프절, 36.4%), 일측 station 11 (엽간 림프절, 27.3%), 일측 station 10(폐문 림프절, 25.5%) 순이었다. 결론 하인두암, 재발성 종양 및 높은 TNM 단계인 경우, 두경부암의 종격동 림프절 전이 가능성을 고려하여야 한다.

• The World Journal of Men's Health
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.612-622
• /
• 2023

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of udenafil 75 mg once daily in patients with erectile dysfunction following bilateral nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (BNS-RALP). Materials and Methods A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study was conducted. Among patients with localized prostate cancer with international index of erectile function-erectile function domain (IIEF-EF) score of 18 or higher before BNS-RALP, those who developed postoperative erectile dysfunction (IIEF-EF score 14 or less at 4 weeks after BNS-RALP) were enrolled. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to the udenafil 75 mg daily group or the placebo group in a 2:1 ratio. Each subject was followed up at 8 weeks (V2), 20 weeks (V3), and 32 weeks (V4) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of udenafil. Results In all, 101 patients were screened, of whom 99 were enrolled. Of the 99 patients, 67 were assigned to the experimental group and 32 to the control group. Ten (14.93%) patients in the experimental group and 10 (31.25%) in the control group dropped out of the study. After 32 weeks of treatment, IIEF-EF score of 22 or higher was seen in 36.51% (23/63) of patients in the experimental group and 13.04% (3/23) patients in the control group (p=0.021). The proportion of patients with IIEF-EF improvement of 25% or more compared to the baseline was 82.54% (52/63) in the experimental group and 62.96% (17/27) in the control group (p=0.058). Conclusions Udenafil 75 mg once daily after BNS-RALP improved the erectile function without any severe adverse effects.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.3-106
• /
• 2023

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.