• Architectural research
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.129-135
• /
• 2018

In order to compare the development performance of headed reinforcing bar and straight reinforcing bar in tension for steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC), pullout test of specimens with reinforcing bar which was anchored on simple beam perpendicularly was conducted. The experimental variables were steel fiber volume ratio ($V_{Rsf}$), concrete compressive strength, and existence of head. As the result of test, splitting failure of concrete in the development direction of reinforcing bar in most specimens was observed. For development detail of headed reinforcing deformation bar, specimens with 1% $V_{Rsf}$ showed approximately 63%~119% increase in pullout strength compare to specimens with 0% $V_{Rsf}$. Test result shows that SFRC is more effective in increasing pullout strength for headed reinforcing bars than increasing pullout strength of straight bars.

• 도시과학
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.21-27
• /
• 2018

With the increase of the skyscraper center, the development of large-diameter and high-strength reinforcing bars is being carried out to solve the dense reinforcement. In case of the steel reinforced concrete with a small cross section such as beam-column joints, the development length becomes short when straight bars are used. Therefore, it is possible to solve the problem that the development length becomes short by using the bearing strength of the hooked bar and headed bar. In this study, the exterior beam-column joint test of SD700 hooked bar and headed bar with anchorage length of 20db was conducted to extend the development length limitation of hooked bar and headed bar. As a result of the evaluation of the anchorage strength using the design equation by KCI, the average of the [measured value]/[predicted value] ratio was 1.31 for the hooked reinforcing bars. In the case of headed bars, the average of the [measured value]/[predicted value] ratio was 1.12. In addition, in order to compare the anchorage performance of the hooked bar and the headed bar, the measured values were divided by the square root of the compressive strength of the concrete to compare the anchorage strength. Under the same conditions, the anchorage strength of headed bars was 8.5% higher than the hooked bars.

• 한국방재학회 논문집
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.95-104
• /
• 2002

이 논문은 콘크리트 콘 파괴에 의해 지배될 때의 인장력의 예측과 Headed bar의 인발 파괴 양상을 보여준다. 1개의 다른 플레이트 형상과 세가지의 서로 다른 용접 방법에 따라 시험이 이루어졌다. 시험의 변수는 Headed plate에 연결된 철근의 직경(16mm, 19mm, 22mm), 형상(원형, 직사각형, 정사각형)과 head plate의 차원(면적, 두께), 철근과 head plate와의 연결을 위한 용접 방법(일반용접, 마찰용접)이다. Headed bar는 ASTM 970-98에 기초한 모양과 두께를 가진 다른 단면적으로 제조되었으며 콘크리트의 부착 길이는 CSA 23.3-94에 의거하여 산정되었다. 정적 인장하중이 적용되었으며 시험 인발 성능은 ACI-349와 CCD 방법과 같은 현재의 설계방법에 의해 산출된 값과 비교하였다. 실험결과와 기존식을 비교하면 Headed bar가 앵커와 달리 넓은 플레이트 면적과 이형철근으로 인해 기준식에 비해 높은 강도와 큰 파괴 반경을 나타내었다.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.62-71
• /
• 2015

KCI 2012와 ACI318-11에서 확대머리 이형철근에 대한 정착길이 산정식을 제시하고 있지만 확대머리 이형철근을 이용한 겹침이음상세에 대한 규정은 없다. 또한, 정착길이 산정에 있어서 횡보강근 효과는 고려하지 않고 있다. 본연구에서는 400MPa과 500MPa 설계기준항복강도를 가지는 확대머리 이형철근에 대하여 겹침이음구간에 대한 구속상세를 평가하기 위하여 겹침이음실험을 실시하였다. 겹침이음 구간내 적용되는 구속상세는 스터럽과 Tie-down 철근이다. 실험결과, 스터럽만으로 보강된 실험체들에서 겹침이음강도 증가에 큰 영향이 없어 취성적인 파괴를 나타낸 반면에, 스터럽과 Tie-down 철근으로 보강된 실험체들은 공칭휨강도 이상의 실험휨강도와 휨거동을 나타내었다. 따라서 스터럽과 Tie-down 철근 상세는 400MPa과 500MPa의 확대머리 이형철근에 대한 겹침이음 성능향상에 기여할 수 있는 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2006년도 춘계학술발표회 논문집(I)
• /
• pp.286-289
• /
• 2006

Headed bars have used to the anchoring of the tension or compression longitudinal bars and of the shear reinforcing bars. Recently, lap splices of headed bars are attempted to the joints of precast concrete members and to the connections between old and new concrete members. Previous Michael's experimental research showed that confinement details had an effect on the lap splice performances of headed bars. In this study, the lap splice performances of headed bars(D25) with lap length and confinement details are evaluated through the experimental works. Four specimens, of which variables were the lap length of headed bar and the type of confine details, were tested for the performance evaluation on lap splice. Test results show that the lap length confinement reinforcement improve the performance of lap splice.

• International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
• /
• 제18권3E호
• /
• pp.151-159
• /
• 2006

A total of 32 pullout tests were performed for the multiple headed bars relatively deeply embedded in reinforced concrete column-like members. The objective was to determine the minimum embedment depth that was necessary to safely design exterior beam-column joints using headed bars. The variables for the experiment were embedment depth of headed bar, center-to-center distance between adjacent heads, and amount of supplementary reinforcement. Regular strength concrete and grade SD420 reinforcing steel were used. The results of the test the indicated that a headed bar embedment depth of $10d_b$ was not sufficient to have relatively closely installed headed bars develop the pullout strength corresponding to the yield strength. All the experimental variables, influenced the pullout strength. The pullout strength increased with increasing embedment depth and head-to-head distance. It also increased with increasing amount of supplementary reinforcement. For a group of closely-spaced headed bars installed in a beam-column joint, it is recommended to use column ties at least 0.6% by volume, 1% or greater amount of column main bars, and an embedment depth of $13d_b$ or greater simultaneously, to guarantee the pullout strength of individual headed bars over 125% of $f_y$ and ductile load-displacement behavior.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2001년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.203-208
• /
• 2001

Objectives of this study included design of head and evaluation of the pullout performance of the headed reinforcement that can be used to replace standard hooks in the building exterior beam-column joints. Results of 36 pullout tests are presented. Test variables included reinforcing bar diameters (16-25mm), embedment depth (6-7db), transverse reinforcement, and single-vs.-group pullout behavior. The square head designed had gross area of 4Ab and thickness of db. The headed reinforcement made of Dl6 bars developed pullout strengths close to the bar yield strength, but larger bars developed strengths smaller than the yield strengths. The pullout resistance increased with decreasing spacing of the transverse reinforcement. Use of column ties with 6.0-db spacing improved the pullout performance of the headed bars without causing difficulties in fabricating the specimens. The comparison of the pullout performances between the headed bars and the standard hooks revealed that strengths, stiffnesses, and ductile behaviors are about the same.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.59-67
• /
• 2014

현행 콘크리트구조기준 (KCI2012) 및 ACI318-11에서 B급이음된 일자형 이형철근에 대하여 인장력에 대한 겹침이음길이를 정착길이의 1.3배로 산정하고 있다. 동일 기준에서 확대머리 이형철근의 정착길이를 제시하고 있지만 겹침이음상세에 대한 규정은 없다. 이에 본 연구에서는 400MPa과 500MPa 설계기준항복강도를 가지는 확대머리 이형철근의 겹침이음실험을 실시함으로써, 기준의 정착길이식을 겹침이음설계에 적용가능한 지를 평가하고자 하였다. 실험결과, SD400과 SD500의 설계기준항복강도를 적용한 확대머리 이형철근에 대하여 겹침이음길이를 정착길이의 1.3배로 산정할 경우, 실험 최대휨강도가 공칭휨강도에 비하여 16~31% 크게 평가되었고 연성적인 휨파괴 거동을 나타내었다. 따라서, 이들 철근에 대해 정착길이 1.3배의 겹침이음길이로 설계함으로써 강도 및 변형성능 측면에서 겹침이음 성능을 확보할 수 있는 것으로 사료된다.

• KCI Concrete Journal
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.102-110
• /
• 2002

Results of an experimental study on the pullout behavior of the headed reinforcement are presented. A total of 48 pullout tests was performed to evaluate pullout strengths and load-displacement behaviors in pullout of the headed bars. The square steel heads had gross area of 4 $A_{b}$ and thickness of $d_{b}$ The test program consisted of three pullout test groups: Simple and Edge pullout tests using plain concrete slabs, comparison of pullout performances between the standard hooks and the headed reinforcement, and pullout tests of headed reinforcement using reinforced concrete columns. Test variables included concrete strengths ( $f_{c}$' = 27.1MPa, 39.1MPa), reinforcing bar diameters (D16~D29), embedment depths (6 $d_{b}$~12 $d_{b}$), edge conditions, column reinforcement, and single-vs.-multiple bar pullout. Test results revealed that the heads effectively provided the pullout resistances of the deformed bars in tension. The load-displacement behaviors were similar between the 90-degree hooks and the headed reinforcement. When a multiple number of headed bars installed with small head-to-head spacings was pulled out, reinforcement designed to run across the concrete failure surface in a direction parallel to the headed bars helped improve the pullout performances of the headed reinforcement.t.ement.t.

• KCI Concrete Journal
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.86-91
• /
• 2002

This paper presents an experimental study to investigate the behavior of mechanical anchorage of reinforcing bars in concrete members. Three kinds of mechanical anchorage which are a kind of headed reinforcements are considered in this study. Total seven specimens were prepared to consider the effects of anchoring methods (Type A, Type B and Type C) and anchorage lengths of the reinforcing bars (14 $d_{b}$, 12 $d_{b}$, 9 $d_{b}$). Pullout tests conforming to ASTM were carried out to assess the effects of several variables on anchoring strength of bars. Based on the test results, it was concluded that the behavior of the specimen anchored by the mechanical anchorage with the anchor-age length of 12 $d_{b}$, is as good as, or better than that of the specimen anchored by 90-degree standard hook.rd hook.