• Title/Summary/Keyword: Hatchway System

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.012 seconds

An Application of FSA Methodology to Hatchway Watertight Integrity of Bulk Carriers (살물선의 화물창 덮개부 수밀 건전성에 대한 공식안전평가의 적용)

  • Eun-Chang Lee;Jae-Ohk Lee;In-Cheol Yeo;Young-Soon Yang
    • Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea
    • /
    • v.37 no.3
    • /
    • pp.69-77
    • /
    • 2000
  • This study was a part of FSA study which was initiated by IMO and was applied to hatchway watertight integrity of bulk carriers. Hazards which were involved in high risk level were identified as follows. Ship Operation out of Design Criteria(Hatch Coaming Damage) and Poor Maintenance & Inspection(Securing Arrangement Damage). The potential risk was calculated by risk analysis and risk control option was made to reduce potential risk. The potential risk was about U$60,000/ship-year and could be reduced to about U$30,000/ship-year by applying RCO 1(Advanced system directly related to Hatchway Security). In addition, effectiveness of RCOs was shown by cost benefit assessment.

  • PDF

A Study on the Quality Assessment Using QFD & FMEA (QFD와 FMEA를 이용한 품질평가에 관한 연구)

  • Park, Chang-Kyu
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.18 no.11
    • /
    • pp.78-87
    • /
    • 2017
  • Recently, the quality of a product or system has becoming increasingly important as it means customer satisfaction. The function, which is recognized as a nature of this quality, means how it functions well so it is the closest to the customer satisfaction. On the other hand, it is becoming more important as safety is closely related to destruction or human injury from accidents for engineers who handle large-scaled structures, such as ships. This study analyzed the function using quality function development (QFD) and considering the function and safety, which are being recognized as important in the structure. In addition, the safety and the quality analysis method based on the customers' needs was analyzed using failure mode and influence analysis (FMEA). In addition, the supplementary materials that are important in terms of the aspect of safety and function for the quality enhancement of a hatchway system were determined by applying a bulk carrier and hatchway. As a result, there are commonly understood items in important supplementary materials and parts, which are determined individually in terms of function and safety, because they can enhance both the function and safety simultaneously. This study shows that designers can improve the quality of products and systems by enhancing these supplementary materials and parts with greater interest.

Quality Assessment of Hatchway Using QFD & FMEA (QFD와 FMEA를 이용한 화물창구의 품질 평가)

  • Seung-Min Kwon;Young-Soon Yang;Chan-Ho Shin
    • Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea
    • /
    • v.37 no.3
    • /
    • pp.78-89
    • /
    • 2000
  • The quality of a product/system is getting more important concept nowadays. 'Performance', as one of the quality characteristics, means how well a product carries out its given functions and is the most adjacent characteristics to the customer satisfaction. To an engineer, however, who deals with large structures such as ships, 'Safety' is actually getting more important because of its direct relationship with failures of a product/system itself and human injuries when an accident occurs. In this study, therefore, we consider both performance and safety recognized the most important elements in dealing with structures and present a quality analysis method based on customer requirements by using QFD for performance analysis and FMEA for safety analysis respectively. Applying these methods to the hatchway of a bulk carrier, we could find 8 and 12 important parts based on performance and safety respectively. Among these, only 7 parts were pointed out commonly critical. From these, we can suggest that designers should pay more attention to these 7 parts and thus give a high priority of concerns to them when trying to improve the quality of system.

  • PDF