• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권8호
• /
• pp.1-48
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the Untied Nations' efforts for peace on Korean peninsular after CCF's participation in Korean War. The Untied Nation tried to negotiate th peace plan between two sides from the end of 1950. Once the CCF's entry into the war had been confirmed, the war situation moved to a new phase, and the UN forces, which had guided the war in an effort to destroy the NKP A forces, and to punish North Korea, had to set up new guidelines to cope with the new situation. Accordingly, in late November, 1950, the UN forces camp, mainly the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and the United Nations Command, discussed various options, such as an expansion of the war up to the Chinese territory, a cease fire along the 38th Parallel, or a forced and inevitable evacuation. The Korean delegation to the UN insisted that "the unification of Korea should be achieved only by victory in the war. The Chinese intervention in the war is a Challenge to the UN in the same way as the North Korean invasion. The UN participation in the war was to repulse the invasion. With the same spirit we should drive back the Chinese Communists." The Korean delegation also emphasized to the friendly nations the political objective and will of unification, and that a cease fire at a threshold of unification might return us to the status quo ante bellum, and would be contrary to the Korean nation's desire. At that time, particularly, the US strongly considered the employment of nuclear weapons as one of the new strategies to cope with the Chinese invasion. The international effects of these casual remarks were realized almost at once. The British Prime Minister who had not wanted the expansion of war in the Far East, especially from the view point of the interest of NATO's security, visited Washington. so the conference had a very important meaning for the UN forces' new strategy. On the other hand, at the UN, on the 5th of December, the very day Truman and Attlee agreed to seek a cease-fire under UN auspices, a group of thirteen Asian and Arab states proposed to ask China and North Korea not to cross the 38th Parallel, and sounded out both sides about a cease fire along the 38th Parallel. The United States and the United Kingdom gave their assent, but China and North Korea gave no direct response. The CCF, who were securing the initiative of operation, were not agreeable with the proposal of the UN forces. The Untied Nation has tried to negotiate th peace plan between two sides from the December of 1950 and January of 1951. The Untied Nations' has achieved great results to negotiate for the peace plan on Korean peninsular after CCF's participation in Korean War. It's the results considering both the operation situation and political opinions.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제21권12호
• /
• pp.211-217
• /
• 2020

국방 분야의 기술기획은 무기체계 개발에 필요한 핵심기술을 식별 및 조사·분석함으로써 전력화시기를 만족하여 무기체계 개발 가능하도록 사전 확보하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 핵심기술이란, 합동군사전략목표기획서에 수록된 무기체계 또는 미래 무기체계의 국내개발 또는 생산에 필요한 고도, 첨단기술로서 선진 외국에서 개발 완료되어 기술이전을 회피하거나 국가안보차원에서 반드시 확보가 요구되는 기술을 의미한다. 과거 핵심기술개발 업무는 무기체계의 주요 작전운용성능을 기반으로 핵심기술을 도출하여 과제화하는 방식으로 수행되었으나, 이와 같은 방식으로는 주요 작전운용 성능에 직접적인 영향을 미치지 않으나 체계개발 시 반드시 확보되어야하는 체계종합 기술, 기타 체계 기반기술 등을 확보 불가하다. 본 논문에서는 무기체계의 작업분할구조를 기반으로 구성품 단위에서 무기체계 개발을 위하여 반드시 확보되어야 하는 핵심기술을 식별함으로써 연구개발 시점에서의 공백기술을 방지하는 작업분할구조 기반 기술 조사·분석 방법론을 구체적으로 제안한다. 구체적인 과정은 대상무기체계 작업분할구조 구성, 각 품목별 국내개발현황 조사, 품목 기반 요소기술 도출 및 요소기술별 수준조사 실시, 무기체계 개발시점까지 기술수준이 확보되어야 하는 핵심기술 식별 단계로 구성된다. 본 논문에서 제안하는 방법론의 효과분석은 'A' 미사일 무기체계를 중심으로 제시한다.