• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.300-314
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of small-group discussion and panel discussion as teaching and learning methods on college students' competencies of communication, problem-solving and leadership in a general education course. Participants were 52 college students, and they participated in the 13-session lessons. The data from questionnaires collected before and/or after the experiment were analyzed using a paired t-test and percent. The results were as follows. First, each 'total' competency in communication, problem-solving and leadership was increased statistically significant after the experiment. Second, in subdomains of each key competency, 'directed communication' and 'understanding the perspective of others' in communication, and 'divergent thinking', 'decision-making' and 'assessment' subdomains in problem-solving, and all subdomains in leadership were increased statistically significant after the experiment. Based on the results and students' opinions about discussions, the education implications for small-group discussion and panel discussion were discussed.

• 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.133-146
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to examine how environmental education teachers think about environmental teaching materials of their use in primary and secondary schools. For this purpose, six primary and secondary school teachers were selected for focus group discussion on October 17th, 2005. The discussion of focus group was recorded both on video and audio tapes. Teachers' discussion could be analyzed in the perspectives of two big ideas, 'content selection' and 'content organization and presentation'. The big ideas were categorized into several areas: 1) The idea of 'content selection' was classified into 4 areas such as integration, difficulty level, locality, and timeliness, 2) The idea of 'content organization and presentation' was classified into 4 areas such as learning motivation, teaching and teaming strategy, evaluation method, application of teaching materials. This study provided meaningful ideas, which can be used in developing environmental education materials as well as effective teaching and teaming strategies for school environmental educators.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.75-86
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of Web-based small group discussion on the achievement and satisfaction in the practice-planning phase of Technology and Home Economy. The subject of this study consists of 68 students of a middle school. The 7r7up is divided into two subgroup. the Web-based discussion croup and the face-to-face discussion grouts. each of which has 34 students. The achievement is estimated by individual reports. practice plans and the overall evaluation sheets. To estimate the satisfaction of students. the test sheets were used. together with the interviews of sampled students from both group. The results show that there is a statistically significant difference in the performance of practice between the two groups with the significant level of 0.05(p<0.05). There is also some difference in the satisfaction between the two groups.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.117-126
• /
• 2020

이 연구는 온라인 토론활동에 대한 학습분석 기반 대시보드 유형이 학습자들의 그룹토론에 미치는 영향을 탐색하기 위해 수행되었다. 대학생 51명을 대상으로 참여도와 상호작용 대시보드를 제공한 집단과 토론주제와 메시지유형 대시보드를 제공한 집단으로 나누어 실험연구를 실시하였다. 먼저 온라인 토론활동에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 컴퓨터 쓰기에 대한 태도, 자기성찰 동기 수준에 대한 사전검사를 실시하였다. 이후 온라인 그룹토론 3회를 실시하였고, 참여도와 상호작용 데이터는 온라인 토론 시스템을 통해 자동으로 수집하였으며, 사후검사를 통해 학습성과 데이터를 수집하였다. 연구 결과 토론주제와 메시지유형 대시보드를 제공 받은 집단 B의 참여도 수준(M=47.56, SD=2.37)이 참여도와 상호작용 대시보드를 제공받은 집단 A의 참여도 수준(M=38.13, SD=2.21) 보다 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 반면 대시보드 유형이 상호작용과 학습성과에는 영향을 주지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 연구 결과를 종합해 볼 때 참여도와 상호작용에 대한 정보만 제공받은 집단보다 토론내용에 대한 질적 정보가 포함된 토론주제와 메시지유형 대시보드를 제공받은 집단이 토론에 대한 동기부여를 통해 참여도가 높게 나타난 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 이 연구에서는 학습자 특성변인을 고려하지 않고 대시보드 유형에 따른 효과만 검증하고자 하였는데, 선행연구에 의하면, 학습자 특성이 대시보드 활용에 영향을 줄 수 있으므로 추후 연구에서는 학습자 특성에 따른 대시보드 효과에 관한 연구를 수행할 것을 제안한다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제32권7호
• /
• pp.1109-1123
• /
• 2012

과학교육의 목표를 달성하기 위한 교수 학습 전략으로 과학글쓰기를 활용할 수 있다. 그러나 초등학교 학생들은 과학글쓰기를 어려워한다. 본 연구에서는 소집단 토론이 학생들의 과학글쓰기에 도움을 줄 것이라는 가정 하에 과학글쓰기 전에 소집단 토론을 도입하였으며 소집단 토론의 내용, 토론 중 나타난 학생의 특성이 과학글쓰기 세 영역(과학성, 논리성, 독창성) 향상에 어떤 영향을 끼쳤는지 살펴보았다. 연구를 위해 서울시 소재 초등학교 6학년 학생들 중 같은 소집단을 이루는 4명의 학생들을 연구 참여자로 선정하여 수업의 전 과정을 녹음, 녹화한 후 전사하였으며 학생들의 과학글쓰기 결과물을 수집하여 평가틀에 맞춰 세 영역으로 나누어 평가하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 소집단 토론 내용은 과학글쓰기의 과학성 영역에 많은 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 성취도가 낮은 학생은 우수한 학생의 도움과 영향을 많이 받는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 과학글쓰기 영역 중 논리성 영역 중 구성의 체계성은 비교적 짧은 시간 안에 향상이 가능한 것으로 나타났다. 논지 전개의 일관성은 학생이 개방성이 부족하거나 토론에 대한 잘못된 생각을 가지고 있을 경우 부정적인 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 올바른 논증의 형식과 논증의 목적, 의미에 대한 교육이 선행되어야 하며, 지속적인 토론과 글쓰기 교육이 필요함을 시사한다. 셋째, 성취수준이 중인 학생은 토론의 주제가 친숙할수록 독창성 영역에서 좋은 평가를 받는 것으로 나타났다. 과학글쓰기 수업에 참여해 4명의 학생은 모두 과학성, 논리성, 독창성 영역에서 향상되는 모습을 보였다. 특히 소집단 토론을 통해 성취수준이 낮은 학생이 과학글쓰기 능력에 가장 긍정적인 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 성취수준이 높은 학생이 소집단 토론을 통해 과학글쓰기 능력에 어떤 영향을 받았는지를 구체적으로 밝히지 못했으므로 이에 대한 후속연구가 필요하다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.133-143
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of scientific discussion classes focusing problem finding on the primary school students' scientific creative problem solving ability, science process skills and attitude toward science class. To verify this research problem, the subject of this study was fifth-grade students selected from four classes of M elementary school located in Busan city. For four months, the experimental group of 51 students was taught using the "scientific discussion classes focusing problem finding". The control group also of 53 students was taught in normal classes which used a text-book. All students were given pre and post test to verify the effects of scientific discussion classes focusing problem finding on the primary school students' scientific creative problem solving ability, science process skills and attitude toward science class. The results from this study are as the following. First, the scientific discussion classes focusing problem finding were effective in scientific creative problem solving ability among the primary school students. It is possibly because in the process where one student compare his/her own thoughts with the others' ones and discuss them. Second, the scientific discussion classes focusing problem finding were effective in science process skills among the primary school students. Third, the scientific discussion classes focusing problem finding were effective in attitude toward science class. In conclusion, the scientific discussion classes focusing problem finding had positive effects on improvement of primary school students' scientific creative problem solving ability, science process skills and also could lead to a change in students' cognition about science class to a positive way. Therefore, the scientific discussion class focusing problem finding is hopefully to be provided as an effective instructive strategy of science class in school in the future.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제28권
• /
• pp.93-135
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of programmed instruction versus lecture and discussion method on the knowledge of basic reference sources among undergraduate library and information science students. The hypotheses of the study were: 1. Programmed instruction will be more effective than the lecture/discussion method with regard to academic achievement. 2. There will be a significant difference in learning time between the experimental and the control groups. Seventy-eight library and information science students were participated m the study from the two universities in Chungchong Province. A programmed instruction manual, including 4-types of reference sources-dictionary, encyclopaedia, bibliography, indexes and abstracts, 40-item multiple choice post-test, and a questionnaire for the students' attitude toward programmed instruction were developed specifically for this research. The post-test only control-group design was selected for this experimental study. Students were given instruction on the specific reference titles in dictionary, encyclopedia, bibliography, indexes and abstracts. The control group was instructed by the lecture and discussion method while the experimental group completed a programmed instruction manual by themselves. Both the control and the experimental group were tested right after the instruction of 4-types of reference sources. In addition, a questionnaire asking students' attitude toward programmed instruction was administered to the experimental group. The findings from this study are summarized as follows: 1. The results showed that there were no significant difference in the mean of the post test score between the two groups. Therefore, programmed instruction is viable as an alternative method of instruction in the teaching of reference sources. 2. There was a significant difference in the mean of time spending for the leaning of bibliography, indexes and abstracts between the two groups. Accordingly, programmed instruction proved to be more efficient than the conventional lecture/discussion method in terms of learning time. 3. Students showed positive response to programmed instruction and evaluated it very interesting and challenging. In conclusion, the programmed instruction method was just as effective as the lecture/discussion method in the teaching of reference sources. And students' attitude toward the programmed instruction was favorable enough to secure a continued use of this method for the teaching of reference sources.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.250-261
• /
• 2000

본 연구에서는 토론 과정에서의 사회적 합의 형성을 강조한 개념 학습 전략(SCS)을 개발하여 성취도, 개념 이해도, 의사소통 불안, 과학 학습 환경에 대한인식, 소집단 토론에 대한 인식 등의 측면에서 인지 갈등 유발 전략(CCS) 및 전통적 수업과 그 효과를 비교하였다. 성취도 점수에서는 유의미한 차이가 없었으나, 의사소통 능력 하위 학생들의 경우, 전통적 수업 집단에 비해 CCS 집단의 점수가 유의미하게 높았다. 개념 검사에서는 SCS 집단의 교정 평균이 다른 집단들에 비하여 높은 경향이 있었고, 개념 학습전략은 의사소통 능력이 뛰어난 학생들에게 더 효과적이었다. 의사 소통 불안에서는 세 집단 간에 차이가 없었다. 과학 학습 환경에 대한 인식의 경우, 개인적 적합성 영역이나 학생간의 협상 영역에서는 집단간 차이가 없었으나, 참여도 영역에서는 SCS 집단의 점수가 높았다. 또한, SCS 집단 학생들이 소집단 토론에 대해 보다 긍정적으로 인식하고 있었다.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.157-169
• /
• 2000

This study investigated the effects on interpersonal cognitive problem-solving skill of discussion with children of moral conflicts in traditional fairy tales. The subjects were forty 4-to 5-year-old children. The experimental group took part in discussion after hearing traditional fairy tales showing moral conflict, and the control group only listened to the fairy tales. Statistical analysis was by the SAS program. Conclusions were that discussion of moral conflicts found in traditional fairy tales brings about a positive result in children's interpersonal cognitive problem-solving skill.

• Journal of Community Nutrition
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.36-39
• /
• 2001

We developed a junior high school-level computer assisted instruction CAI lesson on obesity and weight control and compared its effectiveness with the lecture/discussion method. we collected pretest and posttest data on knowledge an dinterest in obesity and weight control form 450 students in junior high school We randomly assigned three groups the CAI lesson group a comparable lecture/discussion lesson group and control group There were significant difference among these three groups in posttest knowledge scores and in interest in weight control CAI student's responses to learning by computer were significantly positive.