• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.87-92
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The green building certification system in Korea was introduced in 2002 and developed as an improvement version of the G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) system in 2013. This study conducts surveys targeting architectural designers and users on significance of certification assessment criteria for apartment buildings on the G-SEED system and examines the differential views between the two groups on assessment criteria. Method: First, The AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method was used to find importance of assessment criteria and then the importances were compared with weighted points on the certification standard. Second, the t-test was used to investigate differential views between designer and user groups on certification assessment criteria based on drawn importances. Result: (1) While designer group considered land use and transportation, energy and environmental pollution, and water circulation management as more important, user group did material and resource, maintenance management, ecological environment, and indoor environment as more important. (2) Based on t-test results, sustainable energy, water circulation system, site management, habitat, acoustical environment, and light environment were found to be different on importance between the two groups.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.506-513
• /
• 2009

The Construction Industry Institute (CII) developed the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI), as a part of their Front End Planning best practices, which helps project managers assess and measure project scope definition risk elements. U.S. Green Building Council are seeing the benefits of sustainable building and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certification by positively impacting life cycle costs, building marketability, and organizational productivity. However, there have been no efforts to integrate these two planning tools in construction industry. By applying a supplemental tool which combines the PDRI with the LEED rating system, construction industry can develop and implement a tailored instrument that leads to total project success in sustainability. The objective of this research is to assemble a new front end planning mechanism for green buildings by incorporating the current PDRI and LEED systems.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2012년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.127-128
• /
• 2012

Recently, Construction industry has been trying to reduce environmental loads reflecting the global trend 'Green Growth'. Internal and External countries are provided 'green building certification', 'relevant law/regulations', 'guideline to life cycle', however, construction phase has been overlooked though environmental loads occurred intensively in this phase. Therefore, this study intend to deduct components reflected the guideline in construction phase and assess them quantitatively. The basis data is collected through survey targeting construction managers and related researchers and analyze these data using Analytic Hierarchy Process.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.135-158
• /
• 2012

외국에서는 1980년대부터 '도서관과 환경', '그린도서관 사서', '환경정보원구축', '소음과 도서관', '환경적 대안으로서의 도서관구축' 등으로 녹색도서관에 관한 논의가 시작되었으며, 녹색도서관인증평가시스템에 의해 인증받은 도서관이 50개가 넘는 상황이다. 본 연구에서는 국내에서의 녹색도서관 구축방향을 제시하고자 하였으며, 이를 위해 국내 외 녹색도서관으로 인증받은 녹색도서관 구축사례를 분석하였다. 사례분석은 LEED인증시스템의 여섯 가지 평가항목 즉, 친환경적 건설장소, 수자원활용의 효율성, 에너지 및 대기, 자재와 자원, 실내환경친화도, 친환경실내디자인을 기준으로 도서관 녹색화가 이루어진 내용을 중심으로 살펴보았다. 이러한 인증은 건축적인 면에 초점을 맞추고 있어서 도서관의 친환경성을 좀 더 확대하여 생각할 필요가 있을 것이다. 즉 아직까지 연구되지 않고 있는 도서관의 서비스, 콘텐츠, 도서관용품 등의 친환경에 대한 보다 심층적인 연구가 필요하다고 본다.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제50권5호
• /
• pp.13-29
• /
• 2022

장애인등편의법 개정에 따라 2021년 12월 4일 이후 최초 공원조성계획이 수립되는 공원 및 공원시설은 의무 대상이며, 공원은 장애인 등을 위한 편의시설을 의무적으로 설치해야 한다. 따라서 본 연구는 공원 인증 평가지표와 공원시설의 건축물 인증 평가지표 및 인증 현황 사례의 평가서를 비교 분석하여 공원 인증 평가지표의 개선 방향을 도출하는 데 있다. 연구 방법으로 첫째, 공원과 공원시설의 인증 대상에 대해 공원녹지법과 비교 고찰하였으며, 인증 과정상 차이점, 인증 실적 등을 비교 분석하였다. 둘째, 공원과 건축물 BF인증 평가지표를 분석하여 차이점 및 공통항목을 도출하였다. 셋째, BF인증 공원 4개소와 인증 공원 내 공원시설의 건축물 인증 사례 4개소를 대상으로 자체평가서, 심사 결과를 중심으로 차이점, 문제점 등을 분석한 후 개선방안을 도출하였다. 공원과 건축물 평가지표를 분석한 결과 평가목적, 평가 방법, 평가항목이 공통으로 적용되는 항목은 매개시설의 접근로 7개, 장애인 전용 주차구역 5개, 안내시설의 안내설비 2개, 위생시설의 5개 범주의 14개, 기타 설비 1개로 분석되었다. 위생시설 항목은 공원으로 평가된 사례가 없고 부설 화장실이 아닌 경우 건축물로 인증되는 것을 확인하였다. 공원과 공원시설의 건축물 배점 점수가 자체평가보다 심사 결과 시 하락하였으며, 건축물은 3개소에서 인증 등급이 하락하였다. 표준편차가 가장 큰 항목은 공원은 BF보행 연속성, 건축물은 접근로 중 주 출입구까지의 경로 항목이었다. 위생시설을 제외하고 공통적인 평가항목 19개를 공원과 건축물의 심사 결과를 분석한 결과 1개의 항목을 제외하고는 사례 대상지별 평가항목의 배점 등급 차이가 발생하였다. 따라서 공원과 건축물 공통으로 평가되는 항목에 대한 동일한 세부 산출기준을 적용이 필요하며, 위생시설은 공원 인증된 사례가 없고 건축물로 인증되고 있으므로 부속 화장실에 대한 개념 정립과 공원 위생시설 평가지표 적용에 대한 논의가 필요하다. 공원 내 평가되지 않는 항목에 대한 조정과 공원 특성을 고려한 평가지표를 신설하는 등 공원 특성에 적합한 평가지표가 개발이 필요하다. 본 연구가 공원 인증지표 개선을 위한 기초자료로 활용될 것으로 기대해 본다.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.59-66
• /
• 2014

G-SEED aims for establishing green environmental building with energy saving and has started for evaluating with multi-residential complex in 2002 by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure & Transport (MOLIT) and the Ministry of Environment to develop the current 10 building types and new & existing building types to be applied. Since G-SEED has been developed for more than 10 years, the strategy of globalization is needed with constant review itself and comparison between other assessments to understand current situation from the global perspectives. This study draws similarities and differences of G-SEED and LEED criteria by the comparison from re-constructed LEED criteria based on G-SEED. "Energy & Pollution" is the most concerned category in both assessments as the result of analysis on category rates. Next concerns are "Material & Resources", "Indoor Environment" and "Water Management". The unique categories in both criteria are "Ecological Environment" in G-SEED and "Innovation & Design Process" in LEED. The conclusion of this research is that two assessments are organized at different locations and with different strategies for developing green building but there are common concerns such as energy saving, material use, indoor environment. As a result, it is expected to use fundamental data for developing G-SEED for global standard.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.709-720
• /
• 2015

After analyzing the actual acquisition status of carbon labeling by year and by product for the past four years, as well as its certification in the construction-related sectors of greenhouse gas emission, this study attempted to present the problems and coping strategies upon issuing the carbon labeling certification in the landscape architecture. During the period of this analysis, the carbon labelings were acquired by 134 enterprises, 267 workplaces, and 735 products, while the percentage of acquisition was highest in the regular non-durable goods(49%), followed by energy-consuming durable goods(26%), regular production goods (19%), regular durable goods(3%), and service(3%). Furthermore, the acquisition certifications in construction sectors, were highest in the various pipes/panel(8 cases), followed by concrete(6 cases), gypsum board(4 cases), and landscape architecture materials(2 cases). The landscape architecture only had two cases in the acquisition certification for the first time in 2012, which accounted for 0.27% of the entire certification products, due to the uncertainty in the process, the lack of professionalism, and the lack of comprehension. However, the study conducted on the coping strategies for carbon labeling in the landscape architecture revealed the following: (1) regular reporting system management through the division of labor in the head office and factories, (2) the building of objective DB through the adoption of data management programs such as SAP, (3) continuous promotion and vitalization of the incentive system, (4) the adoption of mandatory or preferential application system in landscaping projects, management, and bidding, (5) enhancement of elasticity in deliberation of certification by recruiting experts in the landscape architecture sectors, and (6) provision of incentives for the cooperative firms acquiring the certification and support for their participation.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2010년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회 1부
• /
• pp.237-241
• /
• 2010

The Eco-performance assessment program was developed as part of Eco-performance management for buildings at the national level in developed countries. Cases of domestic Green Building Certification(GBC) system was developed but these program's destination of Eco-performance management for buildings needs systematic management by the limited GBC. Generally in the construction industry, Eco-performance management of Building Life-cycle is required. Therefore this paper develop the creation of Eco-performance information and management process, those are from design and maintenance management phases, through suggest the development of a information management for Eco-performance management of buildings. In addition, it makes to decrease the reproduction of information unnecessarily by analyzation of the related association between the information of facilities objects and Eco-performance management. Finally, study the previous reaserch and suggest the BIM by the method of information management and this paper purpose the development of web-based Eco BIM object library management system.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제34권8호
• /
• pp.23-30
• /
• 2018

A necessity of increasing the energy efficiency of the buildings is rising due to global warming and high energy demands prices. Commissioning is an effective way to increase the energy efficiency of the building and reduce maintenance costs. In this study, a case study was conducted to derive the commissioning process of green building and propose management factors that can be used in domestic commissioning projects. The case was a university renovation project that received a LEED Glod certification and conducted the enhanced commissioning. The commissioning is divided into planning, design, construction, and post-construction phases. In the planning stage, commissioning company selection, commissioning goal setting, tasks and responsibilities for each subject are set. In the design phase, preparations are made for inspection and construction steps to prevent design errors. In the construction phase, problems are solved through periodic on-site inspections. In the post-construction phase, a final report with all the details of the commissioning will be created and future maintenance strategies will be proposed. Based on the findings of this study, it will be a basis for the management factors that can be used in the implementation of domestic commissioning projects.

• 대한건축학회논문집:구조계
• /
• 제34권10호
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2018

In this paper, a fundamental study for developing and introducing a new assessment method of the 'Energy Performance' in G-SEED that uses dynamic building energy simulations was conducted by comparing and analyzing the corresponding issues of domestic and foreign green building certification systems. The most significant part of the new assessment method to be developed was a development of a modeling guideline for a reference building using dynamic building energy simulations. In this paper, the composition and detailed contents of the guideline was created to comply with domestic energy codes. In addition, one of the most influential part of the result in the simulations, the 24-hour building operation schedule for a reference building, was created considering the equity with the ECO2 program that is the evaluation tool of one of the current assessment methods in the "Energy Performance". In order to improve the completeness of this guideline, it is necessary to continue the process of supplementation in the future, however, this paper is expected to be of great significance as the beginning of the research.