• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제34권8호
• /
• pp.51-58
• /
• 2018

G-SEED has been introduced with the aim of reducing energy use and resources since 2002, as the system of certificating environmental friendliness of buildings to create comfortable environment. This study analyzed the changes of certification standard of G-SEED since the revision in 2016, comparing certification results of office buildings by grade, category and certification items between G-SEED 2013-2 version and revised version of 2016. Also, this study analyzed the average points and their standard deviation of certification items including both deleted items and newly added items and extracted items needed to be reviewed in the future revision. In the revision, G-SEED has been extended its certification system to involve existing buildings and Innovative Design categories newly introduced with revising the certification items and difficulties. In revised version of G-SEED, the certification grade appeared to change its acquisition ratio decreasing Green2 and increasing Green4, during Green1 and Green3 were similar in proportion. The average scores by categories appeared decrease in Energy and Environmental Pollution category and Materials and Resources category, on the other hand, Maintenance category appeared the highest increase in the average score. Otherwise, Land Use and Transportation, Water Circulation, Ecology, Indoor Environment categories appeared similar average scores both version of G-SEED. In addition, the Innovative Design which was newly introduced category, seems to expect gradual gaining high scores according to technology development in future, although its possession has shown lower scores in revised version.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제34권11호
• /
• pp.105-112
• /
• 2018

Global environmental problems are growing, and the importance of buildings with high energy consumption has been emphasized. In Korea, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs has been promoting the mandatory zero energy building since 2020, and guidelines related to the zero energy building have been developed. In addition, based on the "Energy-saving Design Criteria for Buildings" of the "Green Building Promotion Act" in Korea, the standards for energy-saving design are specified and the energy saving plan is written. Besides, the 'Energy-saving construction standards for eco-friendly houses' also specify insulation, machinery, equipment, and sunshade. Also, there is little consideration about the cost such as construction cost and material cost which should be considered important in the construction stage. Therefore, this study aims at analysis of building type and energy performance versus materials for energy saving building design considering energy performance in planning aspect of initial design stage. In this study, because the variables can not be neglected in this study, it is selected as the lecture facility of the 'K' university campus building which can consider the remaining factors except the passive design element as the control variable, Energy performance analysis.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2014

The building section is providing immediate causes for global climate change problems since it takes about 50% of carbon emission, 20~50% of waste discharge, 33% of energy consumption, 40% of resource use, and 17% of water consumption. So, many countries over the world have developed and implemented green building certification systems to assess sustainable performances of buildings since the early 1990s. In korea, the green building certification system to induce the diffusion of sustainable buildings was first introduced in 2002 and developed as an improved version of the G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) system in 2013 after major revisions of related legislations. This research conducts a survey targeting residents on an apartment building that was certified as green building and examines the importance of assessment criteria on apartment buildings to certify green buildings using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) method. And it proposes a new direction on certification assessment standards from the resident's prospective. As a result, assessment criteria such as indoor environment, ecological environment, energy & environment pollution, and maintenance management among 7 main ones turned out important on assessing the G-SEED system for apartment buildings, while criteria such as material & resource, water circulation management, and land use & transportation did relatively unimportant.

• 교육녹색환경연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 친환경 인증을 받은 학교시설을 대상으로 예비인증 거쳐 본인증을 획득한 시설에서 친환경건축물인증 제도의 부문별 적용 및 득점 비율을 분석하여 문제점을 도출하고, 향후 친환경 인증학교시설 계획에 있어 설계자 및 관련 담당자에게 기초자료를 제공함에 목적이 있다. 본 연구의 범위는 2010 개정친환경건축물 인증 기준 이후 인증을 받은 신축 학교시설을 대상으로 하며 예비심사를 거쳐 본 인증을 획득한 10개교를 분석 대상으로 하였다. 분석 내용은 녹색건축 인증기준 2013 학교시설 인증심사기준(별표4)의 7개 평가 부문에 대해서 적용시설 및 득점비율을 조사 분석하였다.

• 교육시설 논문지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.45-53
• /
• 2012

Recently, as the environment issue has been stand out, people's interests in energy consumption of the building have been increased as well. Especially, university has been classified as the one of the main causes of excessive energy consumption. Therefore, domestic and foreign universities are trying to build a green campus in an attempt for sustainable development. Since early 2000s, foreign universities have been aware that one of the main causes of global warming is an excessive consumption of energy in universities. Accordingly, they adopted various energy management programs for the conservation. Ultimately, enforcing energy conservation and using alternative energy resulted in lower expense and it was a great help for the universities. On the other hand, excessive consumption of energy in domestic universities has been considered as serious, which led them to become the second main energy consumers in 2010. However, it seems people do not truly recognize the impotance of energy management, therefore, relatively little attention has been paid to this matter. Based on Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design(LEED) rating systems for on-campus building operation and maintenance, this research suggests the evaluation standard to effectively analyze the energy management activity with the best practices conducted in foreign universities and to solve the problem of campus facilities management in domestic universities. The result shows that domestic universities do not have a designated task force for effective energy management and the lack of energy professionals hinders for the long term development. Therefore, domestic universities should recognize the seriousness of the excessive energy consumption and develop low carbon green campus through proactive management practices since this is very essential for domestic universities to get more competitive in this global era.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.121-128
• /
• 2018

Given the barriers to implement green building rating systems, Building Information Modeling (BIM) was suggested as an effective solution integrating information into one model and saving substantial time to facilitate certification process. Synergies between BIM and Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED), the most widely used rating system, have been researched for a few decades. This paper demonstrates literature review about the development of integration between BIM and LEED. The research focuses on synergies between BIM and Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design (G-SEED) in Korea, as one of important strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emission. The research compares LEED and G-SEED related items based on evaluation contents. The result manifests G-SEED and LEED share many common items in different degrees. Therefore, it is entirely possible for G-SEED and BIM to adapt same developing mode of LEED and BIM. Moreover, the study measures the potential of BIM in application process of G-SEED certification by investigation of credits in LEED and G-SEED can be earned by BIM. The results of paper indicate the documentation support LEED and G-SEED may be prepared directly, semi-directly and indirectly via sustainability analyses software in BIM.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.28-39
• /
• 2016

건물부분의 온실가스 감축을 위하여 2002년 정부는 녹색건축인증제도(G-SEED Certification)를 도입하였다. 그러나 정부의 각종 활성화정책에도 불구하고 공동주택부분의 인증건수는 전체 공동주택 사업승인건수의 1% 내외에 불과한 실정이다. 이러한 상황에서 정부의 정책은 대부분 공급자를 대상으로 하고 있으며, 정책개선 방안에 대한 연구도 대부분 공급자를 중심으로 이루어지고 있음을 알 수 있다. 하지만 주택시장은 시장의 참여자인 수요자와 공급자의 상호영향을 통해 작동되기 때문에 한쪽에 치우친 시각이 아닌 그들의 포괄적인 관계과 동태성을 고려해야할 필요가 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 녹색건축인증 공동주택시장을 수요자와 공급자의 의사결정을 토대로 분석하여, 시스템다이내믹스 연구 모델을 작성한다. 그리고 해당 모델에서 현재 시행중인 정부의 인증 활성화정책이 어떻게 작용하는지 살펴봄으로써 그 실효성을 분석하고자 한다. 이를 통해 향후 녹색건축인증제도의 활성화 정책 방향제시를 위한 기초를 마련할 수 있을 것이라 기대할 수 있다.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.79-108
• /
• 2014

본 연구에서는 녹색도서관 구축 현황 및 인식조사 연구를 통해 녹색도서관에 대한 인식을 제고하고 녹색도서관 발전방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 녹색도서관에 대한 개요 및 녹색도서관 건립의 기준이 되는 녹색건축인증제도(G-SEED), G-SEED 인증을 받은 도서관과 G-SEED 평가 사례를 조사하였으며, G-SEED 인증을 받은 도서관의 직원들을 대상으로 녹색도서관에 대한 인식도를 조사하였다. 연구결과 첫째, 녹색도서관 및 녹색인증제도에 대한 인식은 낮은 반면, 녹색도서관에 대한 관심도와 그 필요성 인식은 매우 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 녹색건축인증제도 평가항목에 따른 소속도서관의 녹색도서관 구축 현황에 대한 인식 조사에서 평가항목에 대한 인식은 전반적으로 높았으며 이 중 '재활용 가능자원 분리수거' 평가항목이 가장 높게 나타났고 '중수도 설치' 평가항목이 가장 낮게 나타났다. 셋째, 녹색건축인증제도 평가항목은 적합하다고 평가하였으며, 녹색도서관 구축의 필수요소의 중요도 순위는 환경오염방지, 에너지, 생태환경, 실내환경 순으로 나타났다. 넷째, 녹색도서관 구축의 가장 큰 애로사항은 녹색도서관 개념에 대한 인식 부족이었고, 녹색도서관 구축효과는 도서관에 대한 이미지 향상으로 나타났다.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.59-66
• /
• 2014

G-SEED aims for establishing green environmental building with energy saving and has started for evaluating with multi-residential complex in 2002 by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure & Transport (MOLIT) and the Ministry of Environment to develop the current 10 building types and new & existing building types to be applied. Since G-SEED has been developed for more than 10 years, the strategy of globalization is needed with constant review itself and comparison between other assessments to understand current situation from the global perspectives. This study draws similarities and differences of G-SEED and LEED criteria by the comparison from re-constructed LEED criteria based on G-SEED. "Energy & Pollution" is the most concerned category in both assessments as the result of analysis on category rates. Next concerns are "Material & Resources", "Indoor Environment" and "Water Management". The unique categories in both criteria are "Ecological Environment" in G-SEED and "Innovation & Design Process" in LEED. The conclusion of this research is that two assessments are organized at different locations and with different strategies for developing green building but there are common concerns such as energy saving, material use, indoor environment. As a result, it is expected to use fundamental data for developing G-SEED for global standard.

• 한국태양에너지학회 논문집
• /
• 제35권6호
• /
• pp.43-50
• /
• 2015

The G-SEED encourages the installation of new and renewable energy facilities through assessments of the new and renewable energy installation rates. The government also regulates the installation rate of new and renewable energy facilities in the 'Project on new and renewable energy obligation in public installations'. The current criteria concerning the new and renewable energy facilities in the G-SEED are the result of an amendment made in July 2010. As over five years have passed since this amendment, the assessment criteria needs to be reenforced. To improve the current criteria, the calculation results of the installation rate of new and renewable energy facilities in the G-SEED were analyzed and compared to the corresponding calculation results of the 'Project on new and renewable energy obligation in public installations'. And an improved draft for the assessment criteria of the new and renewable energy facilities in the G-SEED was proposed.