• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제15권7호
• /
• pp.5-17
• /
• 2017

Purpose - This study analyzes an economic effect on the project that Korean government supported for the vitalization of traditional markets using an input-output model. From 2002 to 2013, the government provided 180.8 billion won for a Management Modernization Project and 2.851 trillion won for a Facility Modernization Project for vitalization of traditional markets. Research design, data, and methodology - The present study conducted inter-industry analysis by matching industries related to the Traditional Market Project for the measurement, and calculated the ripple effect of each project. Result - The results from the study showed that from 2002 to 2012, the Management Modernization Project and Facility Modernization Project showed a 296.1 billion won effect on production inducement, a 158.7 billion won value-added inducement effect, and a 3,135-person effect on employment inducement in total. From 2002 to 2013, the Facility Modernization Project showed a 6.948 trillion won effect on production inducement, a 2.1109 trillion won effect on value-added inducement, and 40,209-person of effect on employment inducement in total. Conclusions - This study provided an empirical demonstration of a clear effect of the governmental support to traditional markets on developing regional economies. In particular, this study empirically analyzed and presented that there were a considerable amount of an economic effect by region due to governmental policy support to traditional markets.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제61권5호
• /
• pp.49-55
• /
• 2019

This study attempted to investigate the changes in the perception of local government officials about agricultural infrastructure improvement projects due to the financial policy changes. A total of 141 local government officials were surveyed on the priority, the current status of the agricultural infrastructure improvement projects. Irrigation facilities renovation project and Small drainage improvement project had generally high priority, while Support project of cultivation basis for upland crops in paddy, Large scale land readjustment project, and Upland infrastructure improvement project had low priorities. After the introduction of the block grant system, agricultural infrastructure improvement projects had often been conducted by collecting opinions from local residents. The officials in charge of local governments recognized that the agricultural infrastructure improvement projects were reduced due to lack of financial resources and project potential sites. In response to the changes in the agricultural infrastructure improvement projects, most of the surveys showed that the influence of cities and provinces was strengthened. In addition, respondents most needed to improve the subsidy rate and there were a large number of cases requiring differential support to meet the characteristics of the local government. Therefore, it will be necessary to present a new perspective on the agricultural infrastructure improvement projects and to suggest differentiated projects for each regions.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권10호
• /
• pp.5-13
• /
• 2015

Purpose - This study aims to suggest appropriate policies and performance indicators for financial aid recipients. It analyzes the existing regular government policy funds support project, especially its propriety and reasonability. Research design, data, and methodology - When financial aid is effective, it should be able to predict small enterprise business results. Additionally, there should be an evaluation, checking before and after performance rates so that the rate of achievement and outcome can be measured. This study's contribution for small enterprises is in researching the best way to improve this support system. Results - The Small Enterprise and Market Service (SEMAS), currently designated as a support organization for implementing the government financial aid project, has assessment indicators. However, these focus mainly on quantitative indicators and survey results. Conclusions - In the future, there is some need to draw up measures, setting the right direction for developing policies for the small enterprise fund loans and improving the management of the plans. Eventually, this effort will dispel concerns about the present support policy, which is considered to be weakening small enterprises.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.143-161
• /
• 2022

정부는 기업지원을 통하여 기업의 성장을 지원하며, 기업지원 사업의 컨트롤 타워로 중소벤처기업부를 설립하는 등 정책 효율성을 높이는 정책을 추진하고 있다. 그러나 정부의 기업지원 사업의 효율성에 대한 의견은 분분하며, 본 연구에서는 정부 기업 지원 사업이 기업성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지와 내부적 요인인 흡수역량 및 만족도가 기업성장에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 확인하고자 한다. 정부의 기업지원 사업 수혜기업을 대상으로 설문을 통하여 연구를 진행하였으며, 선행연구들이 정부의 기업지원사업 중 재무적 지원을 중심으로 연구했던 것에 반해 정부 지원 사업을 재무적 지원과 비재무적 지원으로 구분하여 정부 기업지원의 효과를 분석하였으며, 흡수역량 및 기업지원 만족도를 구분하여 분석하였다. 이를 통해 정부의 기업지원 사업에 흡수역량 및 기업지원 만족도의 매개효과에 따라 기업의 재무적 성과 및 비재무적 성과에 미치는 효과를 실증분석하였다. 그 결과 정부의 재무적 지원과 비재무적 지원 모두 재무적 성과와 비재무적 성과에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤으며, 흡수역량 및 기업지원 만족도 모두 재무적 성과 및 비재무적 성과 모두를 매개하는 것으로 확인하였으며, 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 이와 같은 연구 결과를 바탕으로 기업의 흡수역량을 향상하기 위해서는 조직문화 및 장기적 시점에서 조직 구성원들이 지식을 공유하고 발전할 수 있도록 사업을 구성을 구성하고 운영하고, 기업지원 만족도의 경우 공급자와 수요자 네트워크 구축을 통하여 기업이 직면한 문제를 정의하고 해결방안을 제안하거나 추가적 지원을 통하여 기업의 성장을 지원하는 시스템을 만들고 운영하며 공급자와 수요자 피드백을 통한 운영효율 개선 및 효율성 극대화 전략을 추진하여 기업지원 사업의 효율성을 개선하는 데 의미가 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.291-298
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 '청년 창의인력 취 창업지원사업' 분석을 통해 디자이너-메이커스 비즈니스 생태계 조성에 있어 정부 디자인 지원정책의 핵심 내용과 시사점을 고찰하고 있다. 메이커 기술에 기반한 디자인 브랜드 육성과 청년 주도형 지역 일자리 창출을 목적으로 하는 이 사례는 디자이너-메이커스가 보다 자유롭고 창의적인 분위기에서 창작활동이 가능하도록 창의문화 조성자로서 정부의 역할을 제시한다. 나아가 각 정부 부처에서 시행 중인 유사 메이커 지원정책들의 효율적인 통합 및 재편과 이를 실리적으로 추진할 로드맵의 필요성, 질적 내실화 지원의 중요성을 강조한다. 결과적으로, 디자이너-메이커스 비즈니스 활성화를 위한 정부의 디자인 지원정책은 신규 일자리를 창출하는 경제적 수치적 목표를 넘어 성숙한 공유문화를 토대로 한 지식재산의 질적 발전, 개방형 메이커 무브먼트에 기반 한 제조업의 신(新)생산 패러다임 모델 발굴이라는 진화된 지향점으로 발전해야 할 것이다.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.197-216
• /
• 2019

The Korean government has been focusing on supporting technology startups to solve social and economic problems such as low growth, declining economic growth rate, rising youth unemployment rate and lack of new growth engine. Although the failure rate of young technology startups is very high, relevant researches are still scant. On the basis of previous researches, this study has identified four growth factors of technology startups: characteristics of entrepreneurs, technical superiority and originality of business items, focused marketing strategy, and follow-up government support projects. Five young technology startup cases were selected and analyzed in the cosmetics industry which were supported by the Six-month Challenge Platform project of Chungbuk Creation Economic Innovation Center. The main findings of the case study were as follows: First, product development through inhouse R&D rather than external contracted R&D was beneficial to acquiring follow-up government support projects and external investment. Second, choosing a small niche market and concentrating marketing efforts on the target market had a positive effect on firm performance. And, third, relevance of entrepreneurs' college major and technological originality of business items were confirmed to influence firm performance positively in the early stage. The results are expected to help young technology startups survive successfully and establish a foothold for growth in their early stage.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.41-54
• /
• 2021

The SW-centered battlefield management information system R&D project takes a long period of 5-10 years or more by applying a complex and rigid batch acquisition strategy. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to institutionalize a rapid and flexible battlefield management information system R&D project management procedure applying agile development methodology, and a government project management organization and contract management method to support it In this study, we analyzed the case of applying the Agile development method centered on Scrum to the US SW-centered weapon system R&D project and the characteristics and problems of the battlefield management information system R&D project in Korea, and suggested improvement measures as follows. First, the battlefield management information system R&D model applies the hybrid development method, and the system requirements analysis and system structure design use the existing waterfall development procedure, and the agile method is applied from the SW requirements analysis to the system integration stage. Second, flexible adjustment of performance, schedule, and cost by organizing an Agile IPT in which military (requirements) - DAPA (project management) - developer - functional specialized organizations (test and evaluation, quality, government research institutes, etc.) participate. Third, improving the Basic Order Agreement so that it can be applied to agile R&D.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.5-16
• /
• 1982

The Saemaul Undong has brought great improvements tothe life-style environment of rural communities, but it has not been able to focuson a health program. In order to improve rural health, develop human resources, and utilise the nation's manpower, the Saemaul Undong should focus on a community health project. Mobilizing the manpower for such a project can be done by providing opportunities for youth and young adults, especially village women, to betrained as primary health caretakers. This project can be achieved through the joint support of the Ministry of Horne Affairs, the Ministry of health and Social Affairs, and other Ministries. It will take decision and courage by government officials to implement such a grand plan, but it is a very crucial task to promote primary health care throughout the whole nation. This calls for top leader's concern & will to adovocate and support a 'Saemaul Movement for health', giving health asfirst priority to the Saemaul Undong as afresh political drive of the fifth Republic of Korea Government.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.25-59
• /
• 2010

The Korean government has operated various mega-development projects in order to help nation progress into the future. However, many problems and concerns have been raised on the mega-projects' delay and failure in South Korea. Moreover, there are many technical and executive problems; such as trial and error of development work, failure of validity test, complicated decision-making processes, and so on. With these concerns and problems to mega-development projects, finding a sustainable development from mega-projects is becoming a new issue in the field of mega-development projects. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate whether or not most mega-development projects conducted by the government exactly corresponds with sustainable development (such as environmental soundness, economic efficiency and social equity) focusing on Saemangeum project. Using causal loop analysis, this study gives some significant results to us. First, for environmental soundness, both central and local government should ensure water-purity control system for farming, industry, leisure, and others. Second, for economic efficiency, both governments not only have to secure a budget for completion of infrastructure of the Saemangeum project but also support financial assistance to Saemangeum project. Third, for social equity, three local governments (i.e., Gunsan, Gimje, and Buan) should stop debate and conflict with regard to an administrative district of Saemangeum region. Finally, most politicians should not use Saemangeum project for political means. Rather, they should recognize the project as a motive power for economic development of Jeollabukdo.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.55-76
• /
• 2018

This study analyzed the effect of the government R&D subsidy program on long-term firm survival. In order to estimate the average treatment effect for the treated group, we used the survival analysis and matching method by constituting a comprehensive dataset of more than 90,000 observations. The analysis results show that the government R&D subsidy has a negative impact on long-term firm survival. In particular, not only the subsidy does not have a statistically significant effect on firm survival in the relatively short-term, the survival probability of the subsidized firms is statistically significantly lower than the non-subsidized firms after six years. These results can be seen as weakening the justification of government R&D support. There may be problems in the subsidy policy itself and the process of selection of subsidy awardees; however, the more fundamental problem is that the subsidy policy is concluded as the one-time event. Admittedly, it would be difficult for the government to precisely manage the subsidized projects over a long term period. However, in the case of a project in which short-term performance is detected, it would be necessary to provide a step-by-step support to strengthen the firm's competitiveness through further support and continuous development of performance. Of course, mid- and long-term evaluations of subsidy support policy should be performed in parallel with such phased support.