• Title/Summary/Keyword: Flanders Linguistic Interaction Analysis

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Implementation of a Class Analysis Tool Based On Linguistic Interaction Analysis Method (언어 상호 작용을 기반으로 한 수업 분석 도구의 구현)

  • Kwon, Oh-Sung
    • Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
    • /
    • v.16 no.4
    • /
    • pp.475-482
    • /
    • 2012
  • A class is a complex and interactive process between a teacher and students. This paper describes a software design and implementation of the tool easily to analyze and quantize teaching ability. Our proposed software is implemented based on Flanders linguistic method. The software can easily represent the linguistic analysis results by abstracted graphic drawings. We carry out the performance test of our implemented software targeting incumbent teachers. In the experimental, we could demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of our implemented software.

  • PDF

An Analysis on Mathematic Classes using Flanders Category System (Flanders 언어상호작용 분석법을 적용한 수학 교과 수업 분석)

  • Lee, Yoon-Gyeong;Lee, Joong-Kweon
    • Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education
    • /
    • v.26 no.4
    • /
    • pp.902-914
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of this study is to provide useful information by analysis on mathematic classes for improve interactions between teacher and student using the Flanders Category System. For this, mathematic classes were observed by videotapes and recorded, 10 recorded videotapes were selected for analysis the property of linguistic interaction. The collected videotapes and records materials were transcribed by Advanced Flanders(AF) analysis program version 3.54. The detail investigated topics for studying are as follows. 1) What is the property of the Flanders 10 code analysis results? 2) What is the property of main and subsidiary linguistic flow of interaction? 3) What is the property of the Flanders index analysis results? The results of this study are as follow: 1) In Flanders 10 code analysis results, teacher's non-directive speaking is 12.76%, teacher's Indicative speaking is 50.28%, student's reactive speaking is 4.07%, student's voluntary speaking is 9.66%. 2) Among the 10 classes, 5 classes' main flow is 'ask convergent question ${\rightarrow}$ student's reactive speaking ${\rightarrow}$ lecture ${\rightarrow}$ ask convergent question', 2 classes' main flow is 'lecture ${\rightarrow}$ ask convergent question ${\rightarrow}$ student's reactive speaking ${\rightarrow}$ lecture', 3 classes' main and subsidiary flow is 'lecture ${\rightarrow}$ ask convergent question ${\rightarrow}$ lecture ${\rightarrow}$ work'. 3) In indices results, revised I/d ratio, student's speaking ratio, student question, wide answer ratio are higher than analysis standard and indirect ratio, teacher's question ratio are lower than analysis standard.

Analysis on Gifted Class in Mathematics using Flanders Category System (Flanders 언어상호작용 분석법을 활용한 수학영재 수업 분석)

  • Lee, Yoon-Gyeong;Lee, Joong-Kweon
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.14 no.5
    • /
    • pp.512-523
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of this study is to provide useful information for improving interaction between teacher and student by analysing gifted class in mathematics with the Flanders Category System. Research questions are as follow. In gifted class in mathematics, How is the result of analysis regarding interactions between the teacher and students, according to 1) Flanders' Coding system? 2) Flanders' language pattern? 3) Flanders' Index system? For this, 3 gifted classes in mathematics were recorded by video camera and analyzed by Advanced Flanders(AF) analysis program version 3.54. Results are as follow. 1) Code Category Analysis mostly consists of lecture, voluntary speaking and chaos, silence work. 2) Most class patterns are not in accordance with effective class pattern models. So teacher needs to accept student's opinion actively and give appropriate feedback. 3) In Indices Results, revised I/d ratio, teacher's question ratio, student's speaking ratio, Student question and wide answer ratio are higher than analysis standard, indirect ratio is lower than analysis standard.