• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권8호
• /
• pp.47-55
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between company risk and factors such as business size, ownership structure, and leverage. The study was conducted on 142 manufacturing sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013 to 2018. The purposive sampling method was used to select the research sample. The sample size for this study was 21 different companies. The analytical approach uses Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with WarpPLS. According to the findings of the investigation, the size of the company has a significant influence on both the amount of leverage the company uses and the amount of risk the company takes. The level of leverage is significantly influenced by the ownership structure. However, the ownership structure does not have a significant impact on the level of risk the company; rather, leverage has a big impact on the level of risk the company faces. The findings of this study are helpful to prospective investors in measuring the risk posed by the company to make judgments regarding investments. The findings of this study are also essential for management to consider while controlling the risk of the organization.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.95-112
• /
• 2009

본 연구에서는 우리나라 서비스기업에 있어서 표준화활동 결정요인을 분석하였다. 표준화활동을 유형(혹은 범주)에 따라 기업의 전사적 표준경영, 국내표준화활동, 국제표준화활동 등으로 구분하였고, 그 결정요인으로 기술혁신활동(R&D와 특허출원), 기업규모, 수출, 네트워크(산업특성), 기업조직특성 등을 고려하였다. 분석된 표본은 서비스업에 속한 102개 기업으로 정성적 분석방법인 로지스틱 회귀모형(logistic regression)을 사용하였다. 분석결과는 다음과 같다, 첫째, R&D집약도는 전사적 차원에서의 표준경영과 국내표준화활동에는 영향을 미치지 않지만, 국제표준화활동에는 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 우리나라 서비스기업들이 국제적 표준화과정에의 참여를 기술이전의 수단으로 활용하는 경향이 있기 때문인 것으로 해석하였다. 둘째, 특허출원은 전사적 차원에서의 표준경영에 부(-)의 유의한 효과를 보여 주었다. 즉 특허활동이 활발한 서비스기업일수록 표준화를 기술혁신의 관점에서 중시하지 않고, 자사 기술정보의 유출이나 특허침해의 요인으로 간주하는 현상을 발견하였다. 셋째, 기업규모변수는 서비스기업의 경우 표준화 활동과 연관이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 표준화에 대한 경영진의 관심은 표준화활동의 유형에 관계없이 표준화활동의 중요한 결정요인으로 분석되었다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.177-186
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 여성 고용이 양성평등을 측정하고 실현하는 데 있어 중요한 지표라는 인식을 기반으로 제조업의 기업특성이 여성고용비율에 미치는 영향을 고용 형태별로 살펴보았다. 2011년부터 2019년까지 유가증권시장(KOSPI)에 상장된 제조업 중 재무 자료 이용이 가능한 5,729개 기업을 대상으로 기업 규모, 상장 기간, 외국인 지분율과 정규직, 무기 계약직, 기간제, 전체 직원 수에서 여성이 차지하는 비율, 전체 여성고용비율 중 기간제 여성비율의 관계에 대해 세 가지 가설을 검증하였다. 분석 결과 대부분의 고용 형태에서 가설이 채택되었다. 기업규모와 외국인지분율이 증가할수록 정규직과 무기계약직, 기간제, 전체 직원 수에서의 여성고용비율이 증가함을 확인할 수 있었으며, 상장기간이 길어질수록 무기계약직, 기간제, 전체 직원 수에서 여성고용비율이 감소하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 기업의 객관적 재무자료를 토대로 여성고용비율에 영향을 미치는 기업 특성을 규명함으로써 적극적 고용개선조치 등 양성 평등한 고용 정책을 위한 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.265-275
• /
• 2020

This study investigates the impact of board incentives as proxied by directors' remuneration on the financial performance of listed textile companies in Bangladesh. Using Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and data pertaining to listed textile companies of Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) during the period from 2011 to 2017 (resulting in a total of 140 firm-year observations), we have estimated the firm performance equation involving directors' remuneration and board independence as the independent variables and some other control variables like firm age, size, leverage, and operating efficiency. The results reveal that there is a negative association between board remuneration and firm performance. In addition, this study finds no significant relationship between board independence and firm performance of the sample firms. Our findings suggest that higher pay to the board does not stimulate higher firm performance and, in turn, results in shareholders getting nothing in return from this and, hence, is a matter of great concern for them. Moreover, our results indirectly indicate that currently directors' remuneration in Bangladesh is not aligned with the firm performance, which has been emphasized in extant corporate governance literature. Besides, this paper further raises questions about the effectiveness of independent directors in the boards of textile firms in Bangladesh.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.103-130
• /
• 2018

It is generally understood that clusters are the promoters of innovation and therefore, the attention of researchers has been increasingly to discern the factors driving innovation among the firms in a cluster, especially in a high-tech cluster. In this study, we identify the variables capturing the nature of a firm that possibly impact the absorptive capacity of a firm and subsequently ascertain their impact on the degree of interactions between a firm, and other firms and associated institutions within and outside a cluster, respectively. Furthermore, we probe the influence of these interactions as a whole on firm-level innovation. The study was carried out in the context of Bengaluru, which houses the densely interconnected network of innovation-intensive high-tech manufacturing firms forming a high-tech manufacturing cluster. Data were drawn from 101 high-tech manufacturing firms belonging to electronics, machine tools, electrical and pharmaceutical industries. Based on the cluster analysis and subsequent graphical analysis on each of the three profiled clusters, it was found that size and origin of a firm have significant impact on the degree of firm's interactions. In turn, higher dynamism of firms in terms of degree of interactions led to higher innovation performance.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.19-38
• /
• 2013

해운기업의 경우 선박과 같은 설비자산에 대한 타인자본의존도가 높아 자본구조를 포함한 재무건전성에 대한 관리가 여타 산업에 비해 높은 특징을 가지고 있다. 아울러 선박과 같은 자산의 확보에 거대 자본이 소요되는 만큼 조달비용을 포함한 자본비용과 장기지불능력을 동시에 고려해야 하는 특징도 가지고 있다. 즉, 투자에 따라 창출될 미래현금흐름이 자본비용뿐만 아니라 장기부채비용까지 보존되어야하는 것이다. 이를 바탕으로 본 연구는 타인자본조달이 중요한 해운기업들을 대상으로 부채 및 기업특성변수와 기업의 투자활동과의 관련성을 알아보고자 하였으며, 자산대비 부채비율, 부채만기, 금융비용 부담률이 해운기업의 투자활동 현금흐름과 관련성이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 아울러 부채가 증가할수록 투자활동현금흐름이 위축되는 결과를 보여주었으며, 기업규모가 작고 경기가 불황일수록 자본의 조달비용측면에 더욱 민감한 것으로 분석되었다. 반면 기업규모가 크고 상대적으로 호황일수록 자본조달비용측면보다는 자본구조에 더 민감한 나타났다. 결국 해운기업의 경우 부채관련 요인이 주요한 투자활동 변수임과 동시에 기업규모와 경기변화에 따라 투자의사결정요인이 다른 양상을 가짐을 시사해주고 있다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.817-825
• /
• 2020

Over the last few decades, corporate frauds have highlighted the significance of corporate governance in deriving firm performance. By using different sample data, extensive research has examined how corporate governance structure influences firm's profitability, but limited research was undertaken on the banking sector of Pakistan. This research adds to the literature by testing how board structure derives bank's performance by using sample data of 19 banks for the period from 2010 to 2017. In addition, the study analyzes the controlling part of size on the link between board governance and bank performance. Findings reveal that banks having small board size, fewer non-executive directors and minimum activity level perform better. Analysis related to bank size illustrates that board size has value in increasing benefits in large size banks in contrast to small size one, while higher participation by board members enhances performance of small size banks more. The correlation results and findings showed that there existed no multicollinearity issue between independent variables. Board size showed positive correlation with the market variable, while board activity tended to correlated negatively with the market performance. Inverse correlation between board size and independent directors indicated that Pakistani banks with greater board size had fewer independent directors.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권9호
• /
• pp.5-11
• /
• 2015

Purpose - The purpose of this research is to provide insights that can be used for deliberate decision making around challenging big data investments by measuring the economic value of such big data implementations. Research design, data, and methodology - We perform empirical research through an event study. To this end, we measure actual abnormal returns of companies that are triggered by their investment announcements in big data, or firm size information, during the three-year research period. The research period targets a timeframe after the introduction of big data at Korean firms listed on the Korea stock markets. Results - Our empirical findings discover that on the event day and the day after, the abnormal returns are significantly positive. In addition, our further examination of firm size impacts on the abnormal returns does not show any evidence of an effect. Conclusions - Our research suggests that an event study can be useful as an alternative means to measure the return on investment (ROI) for big data in order to lessen the difficulties or decision making around big data investments.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.51-66
• /
• 1999

This paper empirically investigates the impact of winning a quality award by investigating the rate of return of a firm's stock in the stock market, and by analyzing the contribution and effectiveness to a firm's competitiveness. It also compares the effect of firms winning MB(Malcolm Baldrige) award with that of firms winning Korean quality awards on the stock market. A comparative method is used to analyze the change of award-winning firms'rate of return and then they are classified by time-series, cross-sectional, firm's size, award agency, and the year of receiving the award. The number of firms employed in this study is 74, however, multiple award-winning firms are included in the analysis, which increased the sample size to 118. Results indicate that Korean quality awards improve an award-winning firms'market value but not as much as the MB award did.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.40-50
• /
• 1999

This paper empirically investigates the impact of winning a quality award by investigating the rate of return of a firm's stock in the stock market, and by analyzing the contribution and effectiveness to a firm's competitiveness. It also compares the effect of firms winning MB(Malcolm Baldrige) award with that of firms winning Korean quality awards on the stock market. A comparative method is used to analyze the change of award-winning firms'rate of return and then they are classified by time-series, cross-sectional, firm's size, award agency, and the year of receiving the award. The number of firms employed in this study is 74, however, multiple award-winning firms are included in the analysis, which increased the sample size to 118. Results indicate that Korean quality awards improve an award-winning firms'market value but not as much as the MB award did.