• Title/Summary/Keyword: FOXQ1

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Nuclear Akt promotes neurite outgrowth in the early stage of neuritogenesis

  • Park, Ji-Hye;Lee, Sang-Bae;Lee, Kyung-Hoon;Ahn, Jee-Yin
    • BMB Reports
    • /
    • v.45 no.9
    • /
    • pp.521-525
    • /
    • 2012
  • In addition to its pivotal role in neuronal survival, PI3K/Akt signaling is integral to neuronal differentiation and neurite outgrowth. However, the exact role of Akt in neuronal differentiation is still controversial. Here, we found that nuclear expression of CA-Akt resulted in unusual rapid neurite outgrowth and overexpression of KD-Akt caused multiple dendrite growth without specific axon elongation. Moreover, microarray data revealed that the expression of FOXQ1 expression was about 10-fold higher in cells with nuclear, active Akt than in control cells. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that mRNA levels were upregulated in NLS-CA-Akt cells as compared to KD or EV cells. Furthermore, our FACS analysis demonstrated that overexpression of NLS-CA-Akt accumulate cells in the G1 phase within 24 h, fitting with the rapid sprouting of neuritis. Thus, our data implied that at least in this early time frame, the overexpression of nuclear, active Akt forced cells into neurite development through probably FOXQ1regulation.

Genetic Features of Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity: What Causes the Invasiveness of Lung Adenocarcinoma?

  • Kim, Dohun;Lee, Jong-Young;Yoo, Jin Young;Cho, Jun Yeun
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.53 no.5
    • /
    • pp.250-257
    • /
    • 2020
  • Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with ground-glass opacity (GGO) can become aggravated, but the reasons for this aggravation are not fully understood. The goal of this study was to analyze the genetic features and causes of progression of GGO LUAD. Methods: LUAD tumor samples and normal tissues were analyzed using an Illumina HiSeq 4000 system. After the tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated, the identified mutations were classified as those found only in GGO LUAD, those present only in nonGGO LUAD, and those common to both tissue types. Ten high-frequency genes were selected from each domain, after which protein interaction network analysis was conducted. Results: Overall, 227 mutations in GGO LUAD, 212 in non-GGO LUAD, and 48 that were common to both tumor types were found. The TMB was 8.8 in GGO and 7.8 in non-GGO samples. In GGO LUAD, mutations of FCGBP and SFTPA1 were identified. FOXQ1, IRF5, and MAGEC1 mutations were common to both types, and CDC27 and NOTCH4 mutations were identified in the non-GGO LUAD. Protein interaction network analysis indicated that IRF5 (common to both tissue types) and CDC27 (found in the non-GGO LUAD) had significant biological functions related to the cell cycle and proliferation. Conclusion: In conclusion, GGO LUAD exhibited a higher TMB than non-GGO LUAD. No clinically meaningful mutations were found to be specific to GGO LUAD, but mutations involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition or cell cycle were found in both tumor types and in non-GGO tissue alone. These findings could explain the non-invasiveness of GGO-type LUAD.