• 한국지진공학회논문집
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.43-50
• /
• 2012

FEMA P695은 설계지진하중에 대한 구조물의 붕괴 안전성 및 내진성능계수의 적절성을 검토할 수 있는 방법론을 제시하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 FEMA P695에 제시된 방법에 따라 6층, 12층 중복도 격간벽 구조시스템의 내진성능을 파악하였다. 구조설계기준에 따라 설계된 기본 모델의 해석결과와 중복도 상부 인방보의 춤이나 철근량을 증가시킨 모델의 해석결과를 비교하여 보강 효과를 파악하였다. 두 예제 구조물의 증분 동적해석 결과를 바탕으로 계산된 수정 붕괴 여유비 (ACMR)는 제시된 $ACMR_{20%}$ 한계상태를 만족하여 설계지진하중에 대하여 충분한 내진성능을 보유하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 인방보의 춤을 증가시킨 모델에 비해 주철근을 증가시킨 모델의 ACMR 증가량이 더 현저하여 보다 효율적인 내진성능 보강방안으로 나타났다.

• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.243-262
• /
• 2012

Nonlinear static analysis as an essential part of performance based design is now widely used especially at design offices because of its simplicity and ability to predict seismic demands on inelastic response of buildings. Since the accuracy of nonlinear static procedures (NSP) to predict seismic demands of buildings affects directly on the entire performance based design procedure, therefore lots of research has been performed on the area of evaluation of these procedures. In this paper, one of the popular NSP, FEMA356, is evaluated and compared with modal pushover analysis. The ability of these procedures to simulate seismic demands in a set of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings is explored with two level of base acceleration through a comparison with benchmark results determined from a set of nonlinear time history analyses. According to the results of this study, the modal pushover analysis procedure estimates seismic demands of buildings like inter story drifts and hinges plastic rotations more accurate than FEMA356 procedure.

• 한국지진공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지진공학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.312-319
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the strength of piers subjected to earthquake ground motion. In particular, the piers of an unreinforced masonry wall under in-plane seismic loading are considered with emphasis. For this purpose, several pier strength equations in seismic rehailitation provisions such as UCBC, FEMA 178, FEMA 273, and FEMA 306 are compared. This strength equations in different provision are applied for calculating the strength of a pier in building. According to the results of this study, it is shown that the assessment procedure based on FEMA 178 overestimated pier strengths comparing to other provisions when all piers are in Rocking-controlled mode.

• 전산구조공학
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.51-57
• /
• 2011

• 전산구조공학
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.33-40
• /
• 2011

• 한국지진공학회논문집
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.37-43
• /
• 2014

In current seismic design code, steel moment frames are classified into ordinary, intermediate, and special moment frames. In the case of special moment frames which have large R-factor, economic design is possible by reducing the design lateral force. However, there is difficulty for practical application due to constraints such as strong column-weak beam requirement. This study evaluated if steel intermediate moment frame could maintain enough seismic capacity when the R-factor is increased from 4.5 to 6. As for the analytical models, steel moment frames of 3 and 5 stories were categorized into four performance groups according to seismic design category. Seismic performances of the frames were evaluated through the procedure based on FEMA P695. FEMA P695 utilizes nonlinear static analysis(pushover analysis) and nonlinear dynamic analysis(incremental dynamic analysis, IDA). In order to reflect the characteristics of Korean steel moment frames on the analytical model, the beam-column connection was modeled as weak panel zone where the collapse of panel zone was indirectly considered by checking its ultimate rotational angle after an analysis is done. The analysis result showed that the performance criteria required by FEMA P695 was satisfied when R-factor increased in all the soil conditions except $S_E$.

• 한국강구조학회 논문집
• /
• 제20권6호
• /
• pp.807-815
• /
• 2008

1994년 노스리지 지진 이전 우수한 연성능력을 보유한 내진상세로 생각되던 WUF-B 접합부의 기둥-보플랜지 용접위치에서 발생 한 취성파괴는 WUF-B 접합부에 대한 새로운 고찰을 요구하였다. FEMA(Federal Emergency Management Agency)의 후원으로 SAC Steel Project에서는 WUF-B 접합부의 스캘럽(Weld access holes) 형상, 용접과정, 용접재료 등을 개정한 내진상세를 FEMA-350에 제안하 였다. AISC Seismic Provisions(2005)에서는 WUF-B 접합부를 OMF(Ordinary Moment Frames)로만 사용하도록 규정하고 있다. 본 연 구에서는 SM490 및 SN490 조립형강을 이용하여 FEMA-350에 제시된 WUF-B 상세 규정을 따라 강종(SM, SN), 보플랜지두께, 보의 춤을 변수로 기둥-보 접합부 실대 실험체 2개를 제작하여 실험을 수행하였으며, 내진성능 평가를 위한 가력 방법 및 내진성능을 평가하였다. JB-1, JB-2 실험체는 AISC Seismic Provisions(2005)에서 제시하고 있는 OMF와 SMF 내진성능을 만족하는 결과를 나타났으며, 보플랜지 두께와 보의 춤에 따른 WUF-B 접합부의 내진성능이 재정의 될 필요가 있는 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국지진공학회논문집
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.105-115
• /
• 2014

This paper is the sequel of a companion paper (I. Performance Evaluation) evaluating the relation between the seismic performance of steel intermediate moment frames (IMFs) and the rotation capacity of connections. The evaluation revealed that the seismic performance of IMFs having the required minimum rotation capacity suggested in the current standards did not meet the seismic performance criteria presented in FEMA 695. Therefore, thepresent study evaluates the causes of the vulnerable seismic performance for steel IMFs and proposes alternatives to satisfy the seismic performance suggested in FEMA 695. To that goal, the results of nonlinear analysis, which are the pushover analysis and the incremental dynamic analysis, are examined and evaluated. As a result, high-rise IMF systems are seen to have the lower collapse margin ratio after connection fracture than row-rise IMF systems and, the actual response isfound to compared tothedesign drift ratio acting on design load design. Finally, the minimum design load values are proposed to meet the seismic performance suggested in FEMA 695 for IMF systems having vulnerable seismic performance.

• Steel and Composite Structures
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.47-64
• /
• 2023

Due to their efficient use of materials, hybrid reinforced concrete-steel (RCS) systems provide more practical and economic advantages than traditional steel and concrete moment frames. This study evaluated the seismic design factors and response modification factor 'R' of RCS composite moment frames composed of reinforced concrete (RC) columns and steel (S) beams. The current International Building Code (IBC) and ASCE/SEI 7-05 classify RCS systems as special moment frames and provide an R factor of 8 for these systems. In this study, seismic design parameters were initially quantified for this structural system using an R factor of 8 based on the global methodology provided in FEMA P695. For analyses, multi-story (3, 5, 10, and 15) and multi-span (3 and 5) archetypes were used to conduct nonlinear static pushover analysis and incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) under near-field and far-field ground motions. The analyses were performed using the OpenSees software. The procedure was reiterated with a larger R factor of 9. Results of the performance evaluation of the investigated archetypes demonstrated that an R factor of 9 achieved the safety margin against collapse outlined by FEMA P695 and can be used for the design of RCS systems.

• 한국지진공학회논문집
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.23-31
• /
• 2011

국내에서 1990년대 설계된 철근콘크리트 내력벽시스템으로 설계된 공동주택에 대한 내진 성능평가를 연구하기 위하여 실제 시공된 13개 건물의 도면을 수집하고 해석을 수행하였다. 내진성능을 평가하기 위하여 FEMA 356과 FEMA 440에 따라 산정하였다. 요구곡선을 위하여 내진설계 스펙트럼은 건축구조설계기준(2009년)에서 정한 값을 사용하였다. 각 건물에 대하여 인명안전과 붕괴방지의 수준에 대한 성능점을 산정하였다. 붕괴방지수준에 대하여 성능점에 도달할 때의 부재의 상태를 확인하여 본 결과, 총 13개중 9개(약70%)의 건물의 연결보와 벽체에 붕괴방지 수준 이상의 손상이 발생하였으며, 내력벽보다 연결보에서 손상이 더 크게 나타났다. 또한 본 연구에서 산정한 성능점과 주기의 상관성을 고찰한 결과, 반비례의 상관성이 있음을 알 수 있었다.