• Title/Summary/Keyword: F-function

Search Result 2,864, Processing Time 0.031 seconds

MULTIPLICATIVE FUNCTIONS COMMUTABLE WITH BINARY QUADRATIC FORMS x2 ± xy + y2

  • Poo-Sung, Park
    • Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.60 no.1
    • /
    • pp.75-81
    • /
    • 2023
  • If a multiplicative function f is commutable with a quadratic form x2 + xy + y2, i.e., f(x2 + xy + y2) = f(x)2 + f(x) f(y) + f(y)2, then f is the identity function. In other hand, if f is commutable with a quadratic form x2 - xy + y2, then f is one of three kinds of functions: the identity function, the constant function, and an indicator function for ℕ \ pℕ with a prime p.

A CHARACTERIZATION OF CONCENTRIC HYPERSPHERES IN ℝn

  • Kim, Dong-Soo;Kim, Young Ho
    • Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.51 no.2
    • /
    • pp.531-538
    • /
    • 2014
  • Concentric hyperspheres in the n-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^n$ are the level hypersurfaces of a radial function f : $\mathbb{R}^n{\rightarrow}\mathbb{R}$. The magnitude $||{\nabla}f||$ of the gradient of such a radial function f : $\mathbb{R}^n{\rightarrow}\mathbb{R}$ is a function of the function f. We are interested in the converse problem. As a result, we show that if the magnitude of the gradient of a function f : $\mathbb{R}^n{\rightarrow}\mathbb{R}$ with isolated critical points is a function of f itself, then f is either a radial function or a function of a linear function. That is, the level hypersurfaces are either concentric hyperspheres or parallel hyperplanes. As a corollary, we see that if the magnitude of a conservative vector field with isolated singularities on $\mathbb{R}^n$ is a function of its scalar potential, then either it is a central vector field or it has constant direction.

SOME PROPERTIES OF F-FUNCTION OF SET

  • Kim, Jupil
    • Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.26 no.3
    • /
    • pp.557-569
    • /
    • 2013
  • In this paper we shall introduce the $f$-function in a set, and give some properties of $f$-function of a set. In particular, we establish a relation between $f$-function of a set and fuzzy equivalence relation. We also introduce the notion of $f$-homomorphism on a semigroup S, and prove the generalized fundamental homomorphism theorem of semigroup.

CERTAIN INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS OF EULER TYPE FOR THE EXTON FUNCTION X5

  • Choi, June-Sang;Hasanov, Anvar;Turaev, Mamasali
    • Honam Mathematical Journal
    • /
    • v.32 no.3
    • /
    • pp.389-397
    • /
    • 2010
  • Exton introduced 20 distinct triple hypergeometric functions whose names are Xi (i = 1,$\ldots$, 20) to investigate their twenty Laplace integral representations whose kernels include the confluent hypergeometric functions $_0F_1$, $_1F_1$, a Humbert function $\Psi_2$, a Humbert function $\Phi_2$. The object of this paper is to present 25 (presumably new) integral representations of Euler types for the Exton hypergeometric function $X_5$ among his twenty $X_i$ (i = 1,$\ldots$, 20), whose kernels include the Exton function X5 itself, the Exton function $X_6$, the Horn's functions $H_3$ and $H_4$, and the hypergeometric function F = $_2F_1$.

CERTAIN INTEGRAL REPRESENTATIONS OF EULER TYPE FOR THE EXTON FUNCTION $X_2$

  • Choi, June-Sang;Hasanov, Anvar;Turaev, Mamasali
    • The Pure and Applied Mathematics
    • /
    • v.17 no.4
    • /
    • pp.347-354
    • /
    • 2010
  • Exton [Hypergeometric functions of three variables, J. Indian Acad. Math. 4 (1982), 113~119] introduced 20 distinct triple hypergeometric functions whose names are $X_i$ (i = 1, ..., 20) to investigate their twenty Laplace integral representations whose kernels include the confluent hypergeometric functions $_oF_1$, $_1F_1$, a Humbert function ${\Psi}_2$, a Humbert function ${\Phi}_2$. The object of this paper is to present 16 (presumably new) integral representations of Euler type for the Exton hypergeometric function $X_2$ among his twenty $X_i$ (i = 1, ..., 20), whose kernels include the Exton function $X_2$ itself, the Appell function $F_4$, and the Lauricella function $F_C$.

A GENERALIZED ADDITIVE-QUARTIC FUNCTIONAL EQUATION AND ITS STABILITY

  • HENGKRAWIT, CHARINTHIP;THANYACHAROEN, ANURK
    • Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.52 no.6
    • /
    • pp.1759-1776
    • /
    • 2015
  • We determine the general solution of the generalized additive-quartic functional equation f(x + 3y) + f(x - 3y) + f(x + 2y) + f(x - 2y) + 22f(x) - 13 [f(x + y) + f(x - y)] + 24f(y) - 12f(2y) = 0 without assuming any regularity conditions on the unknown function f : ${\mathbb{R}}{\rightarrow}{\mathbb{R}}$ and its stability is investigated.

STUDY OF BRÜCK CONJECTURE AND UNIQUENESS OF RATIONAL FUNCTION AND DIFFERENTIAL POLYNOMIAL OF A MEROMORPHIC FUNCTION

  • Pramanik, Dilip Chandra;Roy, Jayanta
    • Korean Journal of Mathematics
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.249-261
    • /
    • 2022
  • Let f be a non-constant meromorphic function in the open complex plane ℂ. In this paper we prove under certain essential conditions that R(f) and P[f], rational function and differential polynomial of f respectively, share a small function of f and obtain a conclusion related to Brück conjecture. We give some examples in support to our result.

A NOTE ON THE VALUE DISTRIBUTION OF f2(f')n FOR n≥2

  • Jiang, Yan
    • Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.53 no.2
    • /
    • pp.365-371
    • /
    • 2016
  • Let f be a transcendental meromorphic function in the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$, and a be a nonzero constant. We give a quantitative estimate of the characteristic function T(r, f) in terms of $N(r,1/(f^2(f^{\prime})^n-a))$, which states as following inequality, for positive integers $n{\geq}2$, $$T(r,f){\leq}\(3+{\frac{6}{n-1}}\)N\(r,{\frac{1}{af^2(f^{\prime})^n-1}}\)+S(r,f)$$.

Degree of Cognitive function, Self-esteem and Depression of the Elderly by Aging (노인의 인지기능, 자아존중감과 우울정도)

  • 성기월
    • Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
    • /
    • v.27 no.1
    • /
    • pp.36-48
    • /
    • 1997
  • This survey was performed to evaluate and compare cognitive function, self-esteem and depression in the elderly related to aging. The data were collected from 200 elders in eight homes for the elderly in Taegu. Data collection was done from June 1 to 31, 1996. The scale used to measure cognitive function was the MMSE-K(Mini-Mental State Examination-Korea), Self-esteem was measmed using Rosenberg's self-esteem scale and depression using SDS(Self-rating Depression Scale). A comparison of cognitive function, self-esteem and depression by aging were summarised as follows : 1. There were significant differences on the cognitive function score in the elderly according to age group(F=24.81, P<.01). 2. There were significant differences on the self-esteem score in the elderly according to age group(F=3.84, P<.5). 3. There were significant differences on the depression score in the elderly according to age group (F=5.90, P<.1). 4. The general characteristics which affected the cognitive function scores of the elders were sex (F=8.45, P<.5), educational level(F=8.86, P<.5), spousing(F=34.59. P<.01), and the perception of health(F=4.63, P<.5). 5. The general characteristic which affected the self-esteem scores of the elders was the perception of health(F=3.81. P<.5). 6. The general characteristic which affected the depression scores was the educational level(F=3.96, P<.5).

  • PDF

The Early Wittgenstein on Russell's Paradox (전기 비트겐슈타인과 러셀의 역설)

  • Park, Jeong-il
    • Korean Journal of Logic
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.163-196
    • /
    • 2017
  • Wittgenstein declares in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus that he resolved Russell's Paradox. According to him, a function cannot be its own argument. If we assume that a function F(fx) can be its own argument, a proposition "F(F(fx))" will be given, where the outer function F has a meaning different from the inner function F. In consequence, "F(F(fx))" will not be able to have a definite sense. Why, however, does Wittgenstein call into question a function F(fx) and "F(F(fx))"? To answer this question, we must examine closely Russell's own resolution of Russell's Paradox. Only when we can understand Russell's resolution can we do Wittgenstein's resolution. In particular, I will endeavor to show that the idea in Wittgenstein's 1913 letter to Russell provides a decisive clue for this problem.

  • PDF