• 한국공작기계학회논문집
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.110-116
• /
• 2002

Here are shown on stress and vibration evaluations and application of piping system in petrochemical plant with and actual example. While stress evaluation by thermal growth has no argument on the calculated results, vibrational evaluations have some different results in accordance with the evaluation methods. In case of the static stress evaluation the ASME B3l.3 code defines 7000 cycles of fatigue lift: in operating the piping system with a design condition. However, the method of vibrational evaluation on piping systems in petrochemical plants has not been established clearly, yet. In this stuffy, it is purposed to present the requirement of a vibrational evaluation method for petrochemical plant piping system, with an actual application.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.133-140
• /
• 2007

This study aims to design and implement a learning evaluation system using .NET which is developed by Microsoft. .NET technology supports higher processing speed than ASP technology. The learning evaluation system is based on the web, consists of administrator module, questioner module and student module. The functions of the system, i.e., providing test questions, performing test, and evaluating result of test are achieving on the web in real time. Even when many users use this system, the system is stable and has a speed response time.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제40권10호
• /
• pp.783-791
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 과학기술부의 21C 프론티어 사업 중 하나인 수자원의 지속적 확보기술개발사업단에서 연구 개발 중인 수자원 확보기술을 대상으로 기술평가 모형을 구축하였다. 이는 개발기술의 가치평가를 통하여 R&D가 효율적으로 사용되고 개발된 기술이 실용화 단계까지 성공적으로 갈 수 있도록 기여함에 있다. 수자원 확보기술의 성격을 반영할 수 있도록 정량적 평가뿐만 아니라 정성적 평가가 모두 가능한 2개의 계층으로 이루어진 평가틀이 구축되었다. 4개의 평가기준과 26개의 평가속성들의 가중치는 계층분석과정(AHP, Analytic Hierarchy Process)기법을 이용하여 산정되었다. 구축된 기술평가틀을 2개의 수자원 확보기술 가치평가에 적용시켜 평가틀이 어떻게 사용될 수 있는지 또한 제시하였다.

• Journal of Multimedia Information System
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.73-86
• /
• 2020

The well-known sentence, "You can't manage what you don't measure" suggests the importance of measurement. The Ministry of National Defense (MND) in Korea is measuring the effort of informatization for various dimensions such as validity, adequacy, and effectiveness using the MND evaluation system to obtain positive and significant effects from informatization. MND views the defense informatization domain as divided into the defense informatization policy, the defense informatization project, and the defense informatization level, which can measure the informatization capability of the MND and the armed forces or organizations. Furthermore, it feels there is some limitation, such as those related to ambiguity and reliability, present in the system. To overcome the limitations in the existing system to evaluate the defense informatization policy, this study proposes a revised evaluation framework for the policy of defense informatization, its indicators, and measurement methods.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.59-70
• /
• 2009

This study is the result of meta evaluation for the self evaluation of defense R&D programs in Korea by using meta evaluating indicators. The overall meta evaluation result of defense R&D programs gained 74.3 points out of 100, so it was evaluated as 'Good'. But it demonstrated that further improvement for overall system of defense R&D programs evaluation is required. And especially, it demonstrated that more alternatives are necessary in order to improve the utilizations and the feedbacks of evaluation results. The evaluation context component gained 80.2 points out of 100, so it was evaluated as 'Very Good'. The evaluation input component gained 73.1 points out of 100, so it was evaluated as 'Good'. The evaluation process component gained 74.8 points out of 100, so it was evaluated as 'Good'. And the evaluation outcome component gained 69.0 points out of 100, so it was evaluated as 'Good'. Basic model of meta evaluation was derived from the literature review and brain storming. And this meta evaluation model was determined by adopting the result of experts who performed evaluations for defense R&D programs in recent years. The reliability of components and items was verified by Cronbach's a coefficient. It was over 0.6 in evaluation components and items. And the reliability of evaluation context was 0.877, that of evaluation input was 0.755, that of evaluation process was 0.755, that of evaluation output was 0.755 respectively. From the analysis, it is attempted to identify possible problems and to find out the ways of improvements related to the self evaluation system of defense R&D programs. The ultimate objective of this study is to manage the programs effectively and improve the reliability and the objectiveness of the defense R&D programs.

• 전기학회논문지
• /
• 제64권1호
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2015

This paper proposes probabilistic reliability evaluation model of power system considering Wind Turbine Generator(WTG) integrated with Energy Storage System(ESS). Monte carlo sample state duration simulation method is used for the evaluation. Because the power output from WTG units usually fluctuates randomly, the power cannot be counted on to continuously satisfy the system load. Although the power output at any time is not controllable, the power output can be utilized by ESS. The ESS may make to smooth the fluctuation of the WTG power output. The detail process of power system reliability evaluation considering ESS cooperated WTG is presented using case study of Jeju island power system in the paper.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국벤처창업학회 2009년도 통합학술대회
• /
• pp.5-24
• /
• 2009

This study is the result of meta evaluation for the self evaluation of defense R&D programs in Korea. The overall meta evaluation result of defense R&D programs gained 74.3 points out of 100, so it was evaluated as 'Good'. But it demonstrated that further improvement for overall system of defense R&D programs evaluation is required. And especially, it demonstrated that more alternatives are necessary in order to improve the utilizations and the feedbacks of evaluation results. The evaluation context component gained 80.2 points out of 100, so it was evaluated as 'Very Good'. The evaluation input component gained 73.1 points out of 100, so it was evaluated as 'Good'. The evaluation process component gained 74.8 points out of 100, so it was evaluated as 'Good'. From the analysis, it is attempted to identify possible problems and to find out the ways of improvements related to the self evaluation system of defense R&D Programs.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.161-168
• /
• 2007

본 논문에서는 웹을 이용한 교사와 학생간의 수학 학습평가 시스템을 제안한다. 제안된 학습 평가시스템은 학습자가 학습내용을 충분히 이해하고 학습한 내용을 진단하여 평가에 응하게 함으로써 자기주도적인 보충학습이 효과적으로 이루어질 수 있도록 하였고 한글을 이용하여 웹 상에서 평가문항의 제작이 가능하도록 하였다. 이러한 웹 기반 수학학습사이트와 평가시스템을 통해 학습자들은 자기주도적인 학습활동과 다양한 문제를 접할 수 있고 정답과 함께 즉각적인 피드백이 제공됨으로서 학습내용에 대한 이해부족 문제 등을 개선할 수 있도록 하였다.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.124-132
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 균형성과지표와 6시그마 추진기업의 6시그마 프로젝트 평가시스템을 통합한 프로젝트 평가시스템의 대안을 제시하고 있다. 균형성과지표 차원의 재무, 고객, 내부 프로세스, 학습과 성장 4개의 관점에서 목표와 평가지표를 토대로 재무관점의 4개, 고객관점의 6개, 내부 프로세스 관점의 5개, 학습과 성장관점의 6개의 평가지표가 연구결과이다. 본 연구의 결과는 실무적으로 적용가능한 지표이며 향후 연구과제로는 특정기업에서 본 지표를 바탕으로 검증연구 및 전략적 체계도와 연계한 통합 시스템에 관한 연구이다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.81-97
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to analyze the level of interest in the achievement evaluation system, under the assumption that the teacher is an important element of curriculum. For this study, surveys targeting the 150 middle school teachers from 6 schools in Pusan was conducted. A questionnaire based CBAM model was used as research tools. For data analysis, mean of relative strength by teacher's level of interest was calculated. And MANOVA was used to investigate the difference among level of interest according to teachers' background such as sex, age, career, job position, and the grade they taught. The results of the analysis are summarized as follows. First, the middle school teachers' overall interest for achievement evaluation system is low. Teachers showed a typical pattern appeared in the early stages of change. They have little interest in the achievement evaluation system. And they should try to fix and change the achievement evaluation system rather than cooperate it. Second, as a result of this analysis of the difference according to teachers' background, no significant differences were found in most of the variables. Significant differences were found only in age, career, and job position from step 0. In running the post hoc, teachers who have less careers, lower positions, and younger ages had less interest in achievement evaluation system.