• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.503-512
• /
• 2017

임신 중 임부가 경험하는 스트레스는 출생하는 신생아에게 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 알려져 있다. 임신부의 심리사회적 안녕이 중요함에도 불구하고, 국내에서 임부의 스트레스를 측정하는 도구는 매우 부족한 상태이다. 본 연구는 1984년에 개발되어 사용되고 있는 26문항의 안황란의 임부스트레스 측정 도구의 신뢰도와 타당도를 확인하기 위해 수행하였다. 산전교육에 참석하는 200명의 임신부를 대상으로 임부스트레스, 우울과 일반적 특성에 대한 질문으로 구성된 설문지를 사용하여 2013년 3월과 5월에 자료수집을 하였다. 주요인 성분분석과 확인적 요인분석으로 구성타당도를 검증하였고, 우울점수와의 상관관계분석으로 동시타당도를 검증하였다. 원도구의 탐색적 요인분석 결과, 6개 문항이 제외되고, 5개 요인(신체적 불편감, 태아, 양육, 배우자 관계, 가사일)이 추출되었고, 57.25%의 설명력을 보였다. 도구의 모형 적합도 지수는 수용할만하였으며, Cronbach's alpha는 .89였다. 우울점수와 상관관계는 유의하게 나타났다(r=.48, p <.001). 본 연구에서 시대적 변화를 반영하여 제시한 20문항의 임부스트레스 도구는 산전 진찰과 간호사정에서 임부의 스트레스 정도를 측정하는데 유용하게 사용될 것으로 기대된다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.97-107
• /
• 1996

Nursing standards determine the type and extent of services that are delivered to the patients and define quality care and communicate the institution's expectations of care. Thus, taking the standard of care and incorporating it into a welldefined indicator of excellent patient care becomes one of the first activities in setting up the nursing service's quality assurance process. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of using a nursing care standards for the quality of nursing care in gastrectomy patients. The subjects were composed of fourty-two under going gastrectomy patients with stomach cancer in general surgery nursing care unit of K University Hospital in Pusan. The data was collected from January 3 to April 13,1996. The subjects were divided into a control group - those admitted from Jan.3 to Feb.12 and an experimental group those admitted from Feb.18 to April 13. The instruments used for this study were a nursing care standards in gastrectomy patients developed by the investigator and an evaluation tool for the quality of nursing care in abdominal surgery patients developed by Byoung-Sook Lee in 1995. The data was analized by means of chi-square test, t-test and Cronbach-alpha test with the SAS System. The result was as follows : The hypothesis, that scores of the quality of nursing care in the experimental group would be higher than that of the control group. was supported(t=-6.12, p=0.00). The detailed results of each standards of evaluation tool were as follows : The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit standard 1:'Collection of basic data of the patients', (t=-3.76, p=0.00). The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit standard 2 : 'Defining nursing diagnoses(or nursing problems)', (t= (-), p= (-) ). The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit standard 3:'Estabilishment of nursing care plan according to nursing diagnoses(or nursing problems)',(t= (-), p= (-) ). The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit stndard 4:'Implimentation of nursing care plan', (t=-2.38, p=0.01). The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit standard 8 : 'Increase of the knowledge of health related to surgery',(t=-2.40, p=0.01). No significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental group and that of the control group in audit standard 5 : 'Recover and maintain of the physical function', audit standard 6:'Prevention of the post-operative complication', audit standard 7 : 'Decrease of discomfort caused by operation', and audit standard 9 : 'Patient satisfaction in nursing care' were found. The standards of evaluation tool were devided into two dimension. One was process dimension which contains four standards(audit standard 1 to 4), the other was outcome dimension which contains five standards(audit standard 5 to 9). The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in process dimension (t=-12.30, p=0.00), but no significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental group and that of the control group in outcome dimension was found. From these results, it is concluded that using a nursing care standards in gastrectomy patients promotes quality of nursing care and nursing care standards of various fields are necessary for effective nursing care.