• 복식
• /
• 제23권
• /
• pp.45-52
• /
• 1994

The aim of this study was to inspect the change of the evaluation scores of the clothing according to the numbers of simple exposure. Two cuts of slides representing a 29-years old female figure clothed either in formal suits or in casual were shown to 41 college female students majoring in clothing and textiles. Questionnaire consisted of 9-point bipolar semantic differentials was given out at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 times of slide exposure. Results were : 1. The evaluation score was the highest after 3 times of exposure . At after 5 times of exposures the score decreased abruptly and increased slightly thereafter. 2. Th evaluation score of the formal suit was higher at the first exposure , but the casual acquired higher score after 3 times of exposure and maintained the superiority thereon. 3. The final score of evaluation of clothing was most similar with the score of after-7-times of exposure, but was almost similar with that of after -5-times of exposure.

• 여성건강간호학회지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2018

Purpose: To develop educational material about nutrition during antepartum period for women pregnant with twins by using smartphone applications. Methods: A series of steps according to ADDIE model, including Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation were used to develop smartphone application of antepartum nutrition care for women pregnant with twins. Results: Based on experts' evaluation, the average score was $4.6{\pm}0.39$ in total. Content score was $4.7{\pm}0.40$. Interface design score was $4.5{\pm}0.55$. Content score was higher than interface design score. User evaluation was conducted in the form of interview. Results of interviews revealed that users generally responded positively to the accuracy, understanding, and objectivity for content items of the smartphone app. As for the evaluation of consistency for the evaluation item of interface design, users answered "ordinary" or "generally yes". For design suitability and accuracy of vocabulary, they answered 'generally suitable'. Conclusion: The smartphone app developed through this study is expected to aid antepartum care for women pregnant with twins. It will also contribute to health promotion of both pregnant women and twin fetus.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.76-84
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation criteria for students' portfolios in an annual intramural contest. To accomplish the purpose, evaluation categories and their questions were developed after previous literature, ABEEK's evaluation guidelines, and eight Universities' evaluation forms were analyzed. Furthermore, experts' validity tests were completed by showing that the evaluation criteria form was validated with a mean score of 4.24. Also, the inter-rater reliability was turned out with a high score of .86. The interview results by evaluators of students' portfolios made the final version of evaluation criteria form include five evaluation criteria categories and their allotted score portions: overall organization(40), personal information(15), certificates and awards(5), curriculum(15), and extra-curriculum(15). The importance of overall organization was discussed from the perspectives of teachers as well as students.

• 부동산연구
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.63-76
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 울산시를 대상으로 하여 중학교 및 고등학교의 전국 단위 학력평가의 결과가 해당 지역 아파트 가격에 미치는 효과를 헤도닉 가격결정모형을 활용하여 실증 분석하였다. 중학교와 고등학교의 학업성취도평가 결과, 고등학교의 수학능력시험 점수 및 전국연합학력평가 점수, 그리고 명문대학교 합격자 수는 해당 지역의 아파트 가격 형성에 정의 관계를 가지고 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 여러 가지 학력평가 성적들은 아파트 매매가격 결정에 있어서 비대칭적 효과를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 중학교 학업성취도평가 결과보다는 고등학교 학업성취도평가 결과가 아파트 매매가격 결정에 더 중요하게 영향을 미치고 있으며, 학업성취도평가 결과 중에서도 기초학력 미달 학생의 비율보다는 보통학력 이상 학생 비율이 더 중요하게 작용하고, 그리고 고등학교의 수능 인문계 점수보다는 자연계 점수 수준이 더 중요하게 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.815-829
• /
• 1996

A physician survey was done by mailing for the purpose of performing hospital services evaluation and ranking. A slightly over one thousand samples were drawn from the list of professional societies, and 324 physicians(about 32 percent) replied. This study has focused on developing easy and simple method to evaluate hospital services, and providing patients with useful information. Hospital service structure and process were evaluated without outcome evaluation, because it is difficult to obtain reliable data regarding health services outcome indicators. Clinical specialty was targeted to evaluate, and three specialties were chosen, that is obstetrics & gynecology, cardiology, and proctology. Among 16 structural indicators, four indicators were finally chosen in each specialty by respondent specialists. And then using these indicators, structural score was calculated for study hospitals. For process evaluation, physicians were requested to nominate five most famous hospitals. The nomination score and structural score were summed up to produce final score and hospital ranking. This method is very easy to conduct rather than other hospital services evaluation methods prevailing in Korea. And it is more useful for patients to choose hospitals, according to his/her own purpose, because it gives high ranking hospitals with specific clinical specialty.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.365-372
• /
• 2006

Purpose: OSCE, Objective Structured Clinical Examination, is a good way to evaluate clinical skills of nursing students. To do this, we need modules, evaluators, persons to run the examination, as well as models and standardized patients if necessary. Author coached nursing students to develop modules and ran the examination by themselves. Method: 24 third-year and 4 first-year students volunteered; third-year students developed 5 modules, and organized and ran the examination. First-year students played patient role. 60 2nd-year students participated as examinees. Modules were duplicated to finish examination in a given time. The relationship between OSCE score, conventional clinical evaluation score and credit of students was compared. Effect of module duplication on score was tested. And responses of examinees were collected. Results: There was no correlation between OSCE and conventional clinical evaluation score (r=0.07), and credit (r=0.27), And there was no difference of OSCE score between duplicated modules $(53.77{\pm}7.61$ vs $55.33\pm7.74).$ Response of examinees to OSCE was favorable. Examinee did not expressed resistance for the evaluation by OSCE developed and ran by students. Conclusion: Nursing students successfully developed and ran OSCE, which was accepted favorably by examinees. Student-developed OSCE may play a role in evaluation of clinical performance.

• International journal of advanced smart convergence
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.52-61
• /
• 2020

The AHP method was used in 30 provinces of China to construct the index system of creative space efficiency evaluation and determine the weight of each index. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was further used to score the indexes at all levels, and then the total efficiency score was sorted. The purpose of this study is to adjust the regional layout of creative space reasonably and implement financial policies accurately through the evaluation of the efficiency of creative space. The results is ranking top in weight of several indicators, which include the number of incubated Startups, the number of innovation and entrepreneurship mentors, the survival rate of incubator, the innovative training activities, etc. It was also found that Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Guangdong and Zhejiang ranked first in the score of creative space efficiency. This study is meaningful in that it was In order to effectively solve the problem of the imbalance of the creative space efficiency in China's province, by coordinating the regional pattern, establishing a sound service system and improving the efficiency evaluation system.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.41-47
• /
• 2019

In this paper, we propose a new batter evaluation model that reflects the skill of the opponent pitcher in Korean professional baseball. The model consists of evaluation factors such as Run Value, Contribution Score and Ball Consumption considering the pitcher grade. These evaluation factors are calculated as different data. In order to include the evaluation factors having different characteristics into one model, each evaluation factor is weighted and added. The genetic algorithms were used to calculate the weights, and the data were based on the 2016 records of Korea Professional Baseball and the salary data of the players of 2017. As a result of calculation of the weight, the weight of the Run Value was high and the weight of the Contribution Score was very low. This means that when calculating the annual salary, it reflects much of the expected score according to the batting result of the batter. On the other hand, the contribution score indicating the degree to which the batting result contributed to the victory of the team according to the state of the economy is not reflected in the salary or point system.

• 한국농공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농공학회 1998년도 학술발표회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.198-203
• /
• 1998

This study, a sub-one of comprehensive research works titled under “Rural Resources Evaluation System”, tried to verify utility/applicability of the developed model system through the case study works on 3 sample villages, Backya, Uyan and Suyu, representing the lowland, upland and seashore villages respectively. From the various surveying and collecting works including the official/statistical data collection, map analysis, insitu investigation, field survey and written material review, the original data set were obtained and manipulated into final input data for resources grading. After then, by the automatized calculation procedure of “Rural Resources Evaluation System”, score results for resources evaluation were finally produced with the total maximum score being 1,000. Through comparing works among score results of 3 case villages and between score results and areal characteristics of each case village, the applicability of the system developed in this study was well confirmed.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.77-92
• /
• 2004

It is difficult but very necessary to measure the productivity of container terminals as logistics service provider. It is meaningful to find the appropriate inputs and outputs of the logistics service delivery systems and to measure the relationship between these inputs and outputs. This study proposes a model of evaluating the efficiency of container terminals. The evaluation consists of three phases. First, DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis) phase, determines the efficiency score and weights of DMUs(Decision Making Unit). This phase performs through four steps : selection of DMU, selection of DEA model, determination of input and output factors, calculation of efficiency score and weights for each DMU. Secondly, CEM (Cross Evaluation Model) phase, is to calculate the cross-efficiency scores of DMUs. This phase performs through three steps: selection of CEM, determination of cross-efficiency score for each DMU and development of cross-efficiency matrix. Finally, average cross-efficiency analysis phase is to compute the average cross-efficiency score. The proposed model discriminates among DMUs and ranks DMUs, whether they are efficient or inefficient.