• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제54권4호
• /
• pp.302-309
• /
• 2021

Totally robotic esophagectomy is performed using a robotic technique without additional thoracoscopy or laparoscopy. However, most robotic esophagectomies are currently performed in a hybrid form combining robotic and other endoscopic techniques. Laparoscopic stomach mobilization and thoracoscopic esophagogastric anastomosis are commonly used methods in robotic esophagectomy. In this paper, totally robotic esophagectomy without thoracoscopic or laparoscopic assistance is presented.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제49권2호
• /
• pp.99-106
• /
• 2016

Background: Barium swallow is performed following esophagectomy to evaluate the anastomosis for detection of leaks and to assess the emptying of the gastric conduit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the barium swallow study in diagnosing anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy from January 2000 to December 2013 at our institution were investigated. Barium swallow was routinely done between days 5-7 to detect a leak. These results were compared to clinically determined leaks (defined by neck wound infection requiring jejunal feeds and or parenteral nutrition) during the postoperative period. The sensitivity and specificity of barium swallow in diagnosing clinically significant anastomotic leaks was determined. Results: A total of 395 esophagectomies were performed (mean age, 62.2 years). The indications for the esophagectomy were as follows: malignancy (n=320), high-grade dysplasia (n=14), perforation (n=27), benign stricture (n=7), achalasia (n=16), and other (n=11). A variety of techniques were used including transhiatal (n=351), McKeown (n=35), and Ivor Lewis (n=9) esophagectomies. Operative mortality was 2.8% (n=11). Three hundred and sixty-eight patients (93%) underwent barium swallow study after esophagectomy. Clinically significant anastomotic leak was identified in 36 patients (9.8%). Barium swallow was able to detect only 13/36 clinically significant leaks. The sensitivity of the swallow in diagnosing a leak was 36% and specificity was 97%. The positive and negative predictive values of barium swallow study in detecting leaks were 59% and 93%, respectively. Conclusion: Barium swallow is an insensitive but specific test for detecting leaks at the cervical anastomotic site after esophagectomy.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제54권6호
• /
• pp.454-459
• /
• 2021

According to statistics from 2017, esophageal cancer is the fifteenth most common cancer and the eleventh most common cause of cancer-related death in Korea. The most common pathology is esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Moreover, the incidence of esophageal cancer has been gradually decreasing in Korea, and the percentage of early-stage cases has gradually increased to the point that it is higher than that of other countries. The 5-year relative survival rate has improved over time. Approximately 800 esophagectomy procedures are performed annually. Using a cut-off number of 21 cases per 2 years to define high-volume centers, it was found that 70% of esophagectomies were performed by a few high-volume centers. Unfortunately, there is no nationwide registry or database on esophageal cancer and esophagectomy in Korea. Efforts to establish a nationwide database on esophageal cancer and esophagectomy should be made.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.398-405
• /
• 1992

Twenty nine adult patients underwent surgical esohpagectomy and one, bypass procedure for documented carcinoma of esophagus and cadiac portion of stomach at Chonnam National University Hospital from Jan 1986 to April 1991. There were several kinds of esophagectomies including through transhiatal, left thoracotomy only, laparotomy and thoracotomy, and laparotomy and right thoracotomy and cervical incision. Twenty five and squamous cell carcinoma and 5, adenocarcinoma. The tumor locations were the upper third in 3, middle third in 12, lower third in 10 and cardiac portion of stomach in 5. After operation, 8[27%] patients were classified in Stage IIa, 6[20%] patients in Stage IIb, 15 patients[50%] in Stage III and one patient in Stage IV. Major postoperative complications included anastomotic narrowing in 3, limited suture line leak in 2, wound infection in 2, hoarseness in 2, pseudomembraneous enterocolitis in 1 and herpes zoster in 1. There was no death within 30 days of operation. Ten months survival was 100% for patients with Stage lIa, 67% for patients with Stage IIb, 50% for patients with Stage III. Furthermore, 20 months survival was 75% in IIIa, 33% in IIb, and 40% in III. But there were no significant differences in survivals among the stage. The actuarial survival is 58% at one year and 41% at two years, The periods of average survival is 589 days after operation.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제31권11호
• /
• pp.1081-1084
• /
• 1998

연구배경 : 식도암은 근치율이 낮고, 광범위 림프절 절제후에도 그 성적이 나쁜 편이다. 따라서 경부 림프절 절제가 식도수술결과에 미치는 효과를 알아보고자 식도수술 환자에서 경부림프절 전이가 된 환자를 조사하였다 대상 및 방법 : 1994년부터 1996년 6월까지 본원에서 흉부식도암 수술을 받은 32명의 환자 중 고식적 수술을 시행받은 25명의 환자를 대상으로 하여 경부림프절 절제의 유무를 기준으로 두 그룹으로 나뉘어 연구하였다. 두 그룹 모두 흉부식도 전절제술과 동반하여 종격림프절과 복부림프절 절제를 시행하였으나 B그룹은 양측 경부림프절 절제를 추가하여 시행하였다. 결과 : 수술합병증은 두 그룹 사이에서 의미있게 차이가 나지않았다. t수술사망과 병원사망은 두 그룹 모두에서 보이지 않았다. 그러나 평균 마취시간은 B그룹에서 의밌게 더 길었다.(평균 마취시간 90분). B그룹에서 27%가 경부림프절 전이를 보였다 결론 : 그러므로 경부림프절 절제는 흉부식도암 수술에서 의미있는 수술방법이라고 할 수 있다. 장기생존율의 비교가 더 필요하리라고 생각한다.

• 대한기관식도과학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.36-41
• /
• 2009

Background : Controversy exists whether patients with esophageal carcinoma are best managed with classical Ivor Lewis esophagectomy(ILO) as combined thoracic and abdominal approach or transhiatal esophagectomy(THO). The THO approach is known to be superior with respect to operative time, morbidity and mortality, and length of stay, especially at poor pulmonary function patient, but may represent an inferior cancer operation due to inadequate mediastinal clearance compared with ILO. Accordingly, we estimated the THO role at esophageal cancer to compare each operative approach. Material and Method : From January 2002 to December 2007, we performed a retrospective review of all esophagectomies performed at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center; 36 underwent THO, and 11 underwent ILO. Result : There were all men and squamous cell carcinoma but 1 woman at ILO group, 2 women at THO group. There were no significant differences between THO and ILO with age, sex, location of tumor, mean tumor length. There were significant differences at preoperative pulmonary function test(In ILO group, average FEV1 is $2.65{\pm}0.6\;L/min$ and iIn THO group, average FEV1 is $2.07{\pm}0.7\;L/min$). The amount of blood transfusion, hospital stay, leak rates and respiratory complication, hospital mortality rate were not significantly different. Conclusion : There was no significant difference in the post-operative complication, hospital mortality rate, long-term survival of patients of both operative method. THO method had lower mobidity and mortality at poor pulmonary function patient than ILO method. Hence, THO is a valid alternative to ILO for patients with poor general condition or expected post-operative respiratory complication.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제52권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2019

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) has become the standard of care for esophageal cancer patients prior to esophagectomy. However, the optimal timing for surgery after completion of nCRT remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis for esophageal cancer at a single institution between January 2000 and June 2015. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts: those who did not receive nCRT prior to esophagectomy (no nCRT), those who underwent esophagectomy within 35 days after nCRT (${\leq}35d$), and those who underwent esophagectomy more than 35 days after nCRT (>35d). Results: A total of 366 esophagectomies were performed during the study period, and 348 patients met the inclusion criteria. Anastomotic leaks occurred in 11.8% of all patients included in the study (41 of 348). Within each cohort, anastomotic leaks were detected in 14.7% of patients (17 of 116) in the no nCRT cohort, 7.3% (13 of 177) in the ${\leq}35d$ cohort, and 20.0% (11 of 55) in the >35d cohort (p=0.020). Significant differences in the occurrence of anastomotic leaks were observed between the no nCRT and ${\leq}35d$ cohorts (p=0.044), and between the ${\leq}35d$ and >35d cohorts (p=0.007). Conclusion: Esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis within 35 days of nCRT resulted in a lower percentage of anastomotic leaks.

• 대한종양외과학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.95-101
• /
• 2018

Purpose: The standard treatment of esophageal cancer is the Ivor-Lewis operation, which consists of an abdominal phase involving gastric tube formation, and a chest phase involving esophagectomy and anastomosis. We aimed to report our experience of performing thoracic esophagectomy with the laparoscopic gastric pull up (LGPU) technique and its surgical outcomes. Methods: Clinicopathologic data and short-term surgical outcomes of 14 patients who underwent LGPU for thoracic esophageal cancer from August 2008 to May 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Mean age of the patients was 62.3 years and mean body mass index was $21.7kg/m^2$. Eleven patients had medical comorbidities. Patients' mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2. Mean operation time was 428.5 minutes, with the mean abdominal operation time being 138.9 minutes. There was no open conversion case. Three patients had pneumonia, three patients had surgical site infection, and one patient had subcutaneous emphysema within 30 days after surgery. One patient had minor anastomosis site leakage. There was one 30-day mortality case. One patient with postoperative aspiration pneumonia developed acute respiratory distress disease, and died due to sepsis. Mean postoperative intensive care unit stay was 3.5 days, and mean postoperative hospital stay was 20.6 days. Nasogastric tubes were removed on average at 3.4 days, and mean oral intake time was 3.4 days. Conclusion: If the gastrointestinal surgeon has extensive experience in laparoscopic procedures, LGPU will be a safe and feasible technique for thoracic esophagectomy in patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제57권2호
• /
• pp.160-168
• /
• 2024

Background: Data on perioperative outcomes of emergent versus elective resection in esophageal cancer patients requiring esophagectomy are lacking. We investigated whether emergent resection was associated with increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data on patients with esophageal malignancy who underwent esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Thirty-day complication and mortality rates were compared between emergent esophagectomy (EE) and non-emergent esophagectomy. Logistic regression assessed factors associated with complications and mortality. Results: Of 10,067 patients with malignancy who underwent esophagectomy, 181 (1.8%) had EE, 64% had preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, or septic shock, and 44% had bleeding requiring transfusion. The EE group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class and functional dependency. More transhiatal esophagectomies and diversions were performed in the EE group. After EE, the rates of 30-day mortality (6.1% vs. 2.8%), overall complications (65.2% vs. 44.2%), bleeding, pneumonia, prolonged intubation, and positive margin (17.7% vs. 7.4%) were higher, while that of anastomotic leak was similar. On adjusted logistic regression, older age, lower albumin, higher ASA class, and fragility were associated with increased complications and mortality. McKeown esophagectomy and esophageal diversion were associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications. EE was associated with 30-day postoperative complications (odds ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-3.43; p<0.0001). Conclusion: EE was associated with a more than 2-fold increase in complications compared to elective procedures, but no independent increase in short-term mortality. These findings may help guide data-driven critical decision-making for surgery in select cases of complicated esophageal malignancy.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.296-302
• /
• 2002

목적: 흉부식도암환자의 식도절제술 방법에 있어 표준술식은 흉부와 복부를 통한 술식으로 여겨지고 있다. 그러나 우측 개흉과 더불어 흉부와 복부를 통한 Ivor-Lewis 술식(ILO)과 식도열공을 통한 transhiatal esophagectomy술식(THO)간에 논란이 많다. THO 술식은 수술시간, 이환률, 사망률, 재원기간 등에 좀 더 좋은 결과을 얻을 수 있다고 하나, ILO술식에 비해 전이된 임파선 제거에는 부정적인 견해가 많은 것은 사실이 다. 이에 본 연구는 식도열중을 통한 식도절제술과 개흉술을 통한 식도절제술의 여러 결과들을 비교 분석하였다. 방법: 계명대학교 의과대학 흉부외과에서는 1993년 1월부터 2001년 7월까지 식도암 환자 103례에서 식도암절제를 시행한 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 그 중 식도열공을 통한 절제술을 시행(THO)한 환자 27례와 우측개흉을 통한 절제술을 시행(ILO)한 환자 45례를 각각 두 군으로 나누어 술 전, 술 후 결과를 가지고 비교 분석하였다. 결과: 남녀비는 THO군 27례와 ILO군 45례에서 각각 1명씩 여자였으며, 조직학적으로는 THO 군에서 2례, ILO군 1례에서 선암이었고 나머지 모두 편평 상피암이었다. 술 전 나이와 성별, 폐기능, 조직소견, 병기, 식도암 위치에서는 두 군간의 유의한 차이는 없었으나, 식도암 길이와 수술시간에 대해서는 THO군 3.81 cm, 354분, ILO 군 5.31 cm, 453분으로 각각 두 군간의 유의한 차이가 있었다(p<0.01, 0.001). 그리고 합병증 중 호흡기계에 관련된 합병증이 THO 군 11.1%, ILO 군 35.6%로 두 군간의 유의한 차이가 있었다. (P<0.05). 술증과 수술 직후의 수혈양, 술 후 재원일수, 합병증률, 문합부위 누출 및 문합부위 협착, 병원 사망률에서는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 두 군에서 5년 생존률은 각각 37%로 나타났다. 결론: 본 연구에서는 병원 사망률, 술 후 합병증률, 장기 생존률 등에는 두 방법간에 유의한 차이가 없다는 결론을 얻었으나, 술 후에 병원사망률과 연관 있는 중요한 합병증 중에 하나인 호흡기계 합병증은 ILO 술식에서 의미있게 높게 나타났다. 그러므로 식도열공을 통한 식도절제술은 주변 장기에 침범이 없고 암의 길이가 비교적 짧고 술 전 전신상태가 좋지 않아 호흡기계 합병증 등이 우려되는 환자에게 선택적으로 시행한다면 좋은 결과를 얻을 수 있으리라 사료된다. 그리고 두 술식은 집도외간의 기호와 경험에도 좌우될 수 있다고 하겠다.