• Title/Summary/Keyword: Elman network

Search Result 34, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

A Study on the Reliability Improvement of Partial Discharge Pattern Recognition using Neural Network Combination (NNC) Method (Neural Network Combination (NNC) 기법을 이용한 부분방전 패턴인식의 신뢰성 향상에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Seong-Il;Jeong, Seung-Yong;Koo, Ja-Yoon;Lim, Yun-Sok;Koo, Sun-Geun
    • Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
    • /
    • 2005.11a
    • /
    • pp.9-11
    • /
    • 2005
  • 본 연구는 GIS 진단신뢰성 향상기술 개발을 목적으로, 16개의 인위적 결함을 이용하여 부분방전 신호를 발생시키고 검출하여 그 패턴인식 확률을 높이기 위하여 신경망에 Genetic Algorithm (GA) 을 적용하였다. 이를 위하여 다음과 같은 5가지 서로 다른 신경망 모델을 선택하였다: Back Propagation (BP), Jordan-Elman Network (JEN), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Self-Organizing Feature Map (SOFM) 및 Support Vector Machine (SVM). 이와 같이 선택된 모델에 동일한 데이터를 학습 시키고 패턴인식 확률을 비교 및 분석하였다. 실험 결과에 의하면, BP의 인식률이 가장 높고 다음으로 JEN의 인식률이 높이 나타났으며, 후자의 경우 모든 결함에 대하여 정확한 패턴분류를 한 반면에 전자의 경우 1.8% 의 분류 오차가 발생하였다. 따라서 인식률이 높은 신경망이 더 정확한 패턴분류를 보장하지 못한다는 실험적 결과를 고려 할 때, 인식률이 높은 두 개의 모델을 선정하여 각각의 출력에 일정한 가중치를 주고 합산하여 새로운 출력을 얻는 방법을 제안한다.

  • PDF

Fault Diagnosis in Semiconductor Etch Equipment Using Bayesian Networks

  • Nawaz, Javeria Muhammad;Arshad, Muhammad Zeeshan;Hong, Sang Jeen
    • JSTS:Journal of Semiconductor Technology and Science
    • /
    • v.14 no.2
    • /
    • pp.252-261
    • /
    • 2014
  • A Bayesian network (BN) based fault diagnosis framework for semiconductor etching equipment is presented. Suggested framework contains data preprocessing, data synchronization, time series modeling, and BN inference, and the established BNs show the cause and effect relationship in the equipment module level. Statistically significant state variable identification (SVID) data of etch equipment are preselected using principal component analysis (PCA) and derivative dynamic time warping (DDTW) is employed for data synchronization. Elman's recurrent neural networks (ERNNs) for individual SVID parameters are constructed, and the predicted errors of ERNNs are then used for assigning prior conditional probability in BN inference of the fault diagnosis. For the demonstration of the proposed methodology, 300 mm etch equipment model is reconstructed in subsystem levels, and several fault diagnosis scenarios are considered. BNs for the equipment fault diagnosis consists of three layers of nodes, such as root cause (RC), module (M), and data parameter (DP), and the constructed BN illustrates how the observed fault is related with possible root causes. Four out of five different types of fault scenarios are successfully diagnosed with the proposed inference methodology.

Leveraging Deep Learning and Farmland Fertility Algorithm for Automated Rice Pest Detection and Classification Model

  • Hussain. A;Balaji Srikaanth. P
    • KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.959-979
    • /
    • 2024
  • Rice pest identification is essential in modern agriculture for the health of rice crops. As global rice consumption rises, yields and quality must be maintained. Various methodologies were employed to identify pests, encompassing sensor-based technologies, deep learning, and remote sensing models. Visual inspection by professionals and farmers remains essential, but integrating technology such as satellites, IoT-based sensors, and drones enhances efficiency and accuracy. A computer vision system processes images to detect pests automatically. It gives real-time data for proactive and targeted pest management. With this motive in mind, this research provides a novel farmland fertility algorithm with a deep learning-based automated rice pest detection and classification (FFADL-ARPDC) technique. The FFADL-ARPDC approach classifies rice pests from rice plant images. Before processing, FFADL-ARPDC removes noise and enhances contrast using bilateral filtering (BF). Additionally, rice crop images are processed using the NASNetLarge deep learning architecture to extract image features. The FFA is used for hyperparameter tweaking to optimise the model performance of the NASNetLarge, which aids in enhancing classification performance. Using an Elman recurrent neural network (ERNN), the model accurately categorises 14 types of pests. The FFADL-ARPDC approach is thoroughly evaluated using a benchmark dataset available in the public repository. With an accuracy of 97.58, the FFADL-ARPDC model exceeds existing pest detection methods.

Hydrological Forecasting Based on Hybrid Neural Networks in a Small Watershed (중소하천유역에서 Hybrid Neural Networks에 의한 수문학적 예측)

  • Kim, Seong-Won;Lee, Sun-Tak;Jo, Jeong-Sik
    • Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
    • /
    • v.34 no.4
    • /
    • pp.303-316
    • /
    • 2001
  • In this study, Radial Basis Function(RBF) Neural Networks Model, a kind of Hybrid Neural Networks was applied to hydrological forecasting in a small watershed. RBF Neural Networks Model has four kinds of parameters in it and consists of unsupervised and supervised training patterns. And Gaussian Kernel Function(GKF) was used among many kinds of Radial Basis Functions(RBFs). K-Means clustering algorithm was applied to optimize centers and widths which ate the parameters of GKF. The parameters of RBF Neural Networks Model such as centers, widths weights and biases were determined by the training procedures of RBF Neural Networks Model. And, with these parameters the validation procedures of RBF Neural Networks Model were carried out. RBF Neural Networks Model was applied to Wi-Stream basin which is one of the IHP Representative basins in South Korea. 10 rainfall events were selected for training and validation of RBF Neural Networks Model. The results of RBF Neural Networks Model were compared with those of Elman Neural Networks(ENN) Model. ENN Model is composed of One Step Secant BackPropagation(OSSBP) and Resilient BackPropagation(RBP) algorithms. RBF Neural Networks shows better results than ENN Model. RBF Neural Networks Model spent less time for the training of model and can be easily used by the hydrologists with little background knowledge of RBF Neural Networks Model.

  • PDF