단수수(Sorghum vulgare PERS) 품종의 생태변이 및 유용형질의 유전에 관한 연구 (Studies on Ecological Variation and Inheritance for Agronomical Characters of Sweet Sorghum Varieties (Sorghum vulgare PERS) in Korea)
-
- 한국작물학회지
- /
- 제10권
- /
- pp.1-43
- /
- 1971
실험 I. : 본 실험은 단수수에 대하여 재배시기를 이동함에 따르는 실용 제형질의 변화를 구명하기 위하여 1968~1969년까지 2개년에 거쳐 작물시험장 특용작물 연구실(수원)에서 시행되었으며 품종은 조만생, 초형, Syrup형, Sugar형 등 생태적 특성을 달리한 17개품종이 공시되었으며 묘종기 양년 모두 4월 5일부터 8월 25일까지 20일 간격으로 8회에 걸쳐 파종하여 조사한 바 그 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 발아기(발아일수)는 파종기를 앞당겨 저온하에 파종하면 발아에 소요되는 일수가 많고 파종기가 늦어서 기온이 상승됨에 따라 발아 일수가 직선적으로 단축되다가 8월 25일 이후의 파종부터는 다시 지연되는 경향이었다. 발아기간의 일평균온도와 발아일수간에는 높은 부상관관계가 있으나 이와는 반대로 발아일수와 적산온도간에는 고도의 정상관이 인정되었다. 2. 파종기의 지연에 따라 출수일수는 거의 직선적으로 단축된다. 공시된 품종간에 평균출수일수차는 30.2일이란 큰 차이가 있었다. 이들을 10일간격으로 조, 중, 만생군으로 구별하면 조생군은 평균출수일수가 78.5
The wall shear stress in the vicinity of end-to end anastomoses under steady flow conditions was measured using a flush-mounted hot-film anemometer(FMHFA) probe. The experimental measurements were in good agreement with numerical results except in flow with low Reynolds numbers. The wall shear stress increased proximal to the anastomosis in flow from the Penrose tubing (simulating an artery) to the PTFE: graft. In flow from the PTFE graft to the Penrose tubing, low wall shear stress was observed distal to the anastomosis. Abnormal distributions of wall shear stress in the vicinity of the anastomosis, resulting from the compliance mismatch between the graft and the host artery, might be an important factor of ANFH formation and the graft failure. The present study suggests a correlation between regions of the low wall shear stress and the development of anastomotic neointimal fibrous hyperplasia(ANPH) in end-to-end anastomoses. 30523 T00401030523 ^x Air pressure decay(APD) rate and ultrafiltration rate(UFR) tests were performed on new and saline rinsed dialyzers as well as those roused in patients several times. C-DAK 4000 (Cordis Dow) and CF IS-11 (Baxter Travenol) reused dialyzers obtained from the dialysis clinic were used in the present study. The new dialyzers exhibited a relatively flat APD, whereas saline rinsed and reused dialyzers showed considerable amount of decay. C-DAH dialyzers had a larger APD(11.70
전작물(田作物)에 대(對)한 가리비료(加里肥料)의 효과(效果)를 검토(檢討)하고 그 결과(結果)를 다음과 같이 요약(要約)하였다. 1. 작물(作物)의 종류별(種類別) 가리(加里)의 10a당(當) 평균(平均) 시비적량(施肥適量)은 각각(各各) 목초(牧草) 32, 채소(菜蔬) 22.5, 과수(果樹) 17.3, 서류(薯類) 13.3, 화곡류(禾穀類) 6.5kg이다. 최근(最近) 경제성장(經濟成長)과 더부러 목초(牧草), 채소(菜蔬) 및 과수(果樹)의 재배면적(栽培面積)이 급격(急激)히 증가(增加)하고 있어 영후(令後)의 가리비료(加里肥料) 수요(需要)는 크게 증대(增大)될 것이다. 2. 주요(主要) 전작물(田作物)에 대(對)한 평균(平均) 적정가리(適正加里) 시비량(施肥量)은 보리 6.5, 밀 6.9, 콩 4.5, 옥수수 8.1, 감자 8.9, 고구마 17.7kg/10a이다. 가리성분(加里成分) 1kg/10a당(當) 평균(平均) 증수량(增收量)은 화곡류(禾穀類)에서 4~5kg이고 서류(薯類) 46kg로서 수익성(收益生)은 서류(薯類)에서 높다. 3. 전국(全國)의 치환성(置換性) 가리(加理) 함량(含量)의 분포(分布)는 해안지대(海岸地帶) 특(特)히 남해안(南海岸)에서 높고 내륙지대(內陸地帶)에서 낮으며 산악지대(山岳地帶)는 그 중간(中間)이다. 도별(道別)로는 제주(濟州)>전남(全南)>강원(江原)>경남(慶南)의 순(順)이고 경북도(慶北道)에서 가장 낮다. 대 맥(大 麥) : 4. 월동맥류(越冬麥類에) 대(對)한 가리(加里)의 비효(肥效) 및 적량(適量)은 l차적(次的)으로 기온(氣溫)의 영향(影響)을 받으며 토양인자(土壞因子)는 제(第)2차적(次的)인 것으로 생각할 수 있다. 따라서 토양별(土壞別) 또는 토양검정(土壞檢定)에 따른 시비량(施肥量) 결정기준(決定基準)은 기존지대별(氣候地帶別)로 설정(設定)함이 합리적(合理的)일 것이다. 5. 고온(高溫)에서는 토양(土壞) 중(中)의 가리(加里)의 방출(放出)이 촉진(促進)되어 가리(加里)에서 시용효과(施用效果)와 시비적량(施肥適量)이 남부(南部)에서 적고 저온인 북부(北部)에서 높으나 시비(施肥) 인산(燐酸)은 고온에서 고정(固定)이 촉진(促進)되어 남부(南部)에서 시비적량(施肥適量)이 많으며 질소(窒素)는 온도요인(溫度要因)보다는 강수량(降水量)의 영향이 커서 강수량(降水量)이 많은 남부(南部)에서 시비적량(施肥適量)이 극히 높은 것으로 풀이되었다. 6. 도별(道別) 평균(平均) 가리비효(加里肥效)는 남부(南部)로 갈수록 떨어지는 경향(傾向)을 보였고 경북(慶北)만이 예외적(例外的)으로 높다. 경북(慶北)은 치환성(置換性) 가리함량(加里含量)이 가장 낮을 뿐 아니라 산간지역(山間地域)의 저온권 전작지대(田作地帶)가 많은 것이 원인(原因)인 것 같다. 7. 가리(加里)의 비효(肥效)와 시비적량(施肥適量)은 연차별(年次別) 변이(變異)가 크다. 가리(加里)의 비효(肥效)는 저온의 해에 컸고(평년(平年)의 2~3배(倍)) 조해(早害)와 습해(濕害)가 있었던 해에는 적었으며 시비적량(施肥適量)은 저온으로 동해(凍害)가 있었던 해보다는 조해(早害)와 습해(濕害)가 있었던 해에서 더욱 많다. 8. 모암별(母岩別) 치환성(置換性) 가리(加里) 함량(含量)은 결정편암(結晶片岩)>화강암(花崗岩)>수성암(水成岩)>현무암(玄武岩)의 순(順)이나 가리(加里)의 비효(肥效)는 이와 반대(反對)의 순(順)이어서 모암별(母岩別) 가리(加里) 함량(含量)과 비효간(肥效間)에는 뚜렷한 역상관(逆相關)이 있다. 9. 모재별(母材別) 치환성(置換性) 가리(加里) 함량(含量)은 충적토(沖積土)>잔적토(殘積土)>홍적토(洪積土)>곡간충적토이며 가리비효(加里肥效)는 곡간충적토에서 만이 현저히 클 뿐 그 외(外)의 모재간(母材間)에 는 분명(分明)한 차이(差異)가 없다. 10. 가리(加里)의 비효(肥效)와 적량(積量)은 토성(土性) 차이(差異)에 의(依)하여 크게 달라서 가리비효(加里肥效)는 사질(砂質)쪽에서 높고 가리적량(加里適量)은 식질(埴質) 쪽에서 높다. 특(特)히 사질(砂質)인 양토(壤土)와 사양토(砂壤土)에서는 적량(適量)을 초과(超過) 시비(施肥)했을 때 감수(減收)가 크다. 11. 가리시용(加里施用)에 의(依)해서 평균적(平均的)으로 출수일(出穗日)이 1.7일(日) 지연되고 간장(稈長)은 4.4cm가 증대(增大)되며 주당수수(株當穗數)(0.3)와 1,000립중(粒重) 및 저엽비율(租葉比率)이 증대(增大)된다. 콩 : 12. 콩의 가리비효(加里肥效)는 곡류작물(穀物作物) 중(中)에서 가장 적으나 신개간지(新開墾地)에서는 가리(加里) 8kg/10a 시용(施用)으로 자실중(子實重)이 28kg/10a까지 증수(增收)된다. 13. 모암별(母岩別) 가리비효(加里肥效)는 현무암(玄武岩)제주(濟州)>수성암(水成岩)>화강암(花崗岩) 및 석회암(石灰巖)의 순(順)이며 연차별(年次別) 변이폭(慶異幅)도 크다. 옥수수 : 14. 치환성(置換性) 가리함량(加里含量)이 많은 토양(土壞)에서는 옥수수의 가리비효(加里肥效)는 떨어지나 절대수량(絶對收量)이 높기 때문에 오히려 가리(加里)의 시비적량(施肥適量)은 가리함량(加里含量)이 높은 경우에 높다. 15. 옥수수에 대(對)한 가리비효(加里肥效)는 인산(燐酸)의 시비수준(施肥水準)과 교호작용(交互作用)이 인정(認定)되어 인산(燐酸)의 적량(適量) 시용하(施用下)에서 가리(加里)의 비효(肥效)도 크고 적량(適量)도 높다. 서 류(薯類) : 16. 감자는 가리(加里)보다도 질소(窒素)의 요구량(要求量)이 더 많으며 이 때문에 감자가 스스로 토양가리(土壤加里)의 흡수능력(吸收能力)이 큰 것 같다. 17. 감자의 수량(收量)은 식양토(埴壤土) 보다는 사양토(砂壤土)에서 높고 치환성(置換性) 가리(加里) 함량(含量)이 높을수록 높다. 그러나 가리(加里)의 비효(肥效)는 사질토(砂質土)보다는 식양토(埴壤土)에서 높고 전토양(田土壤)보다는 답토양(畓土壤)과 같은 불량환경(不良環境) 조건(條件)에서 더욱 크다. 18. 고구마에서는 질소(窒素)와 인산(燐酸)의 요구량(要求量)은 비교적 낮고 흡비력(吸肥力)이 강(强)하여 불량토양(不良土壤)에서도 상당히 높은 수량(收量)을 얻을수 있으나 가리(加里)의 시비적량(施肥適量)과 시비효과(施肥效果)가 매우 크다는 것이 특징(特徵)이다. 19. 고구마에 대(對)한 가리(加里)의 시비효과(施肥效果)는 토성별(土性別)로 차이(差異)가 크며 치환성(置換性) 가리(加里) 함량(含量)이 낮은 사질토(砂質土)에서도 충분량(充分量)의 가리(加里)를 시용(施用)했을 때는 비효(肥效)가 크게 나타나 수량(收量)이 토양(壤土) 및 식양토(埴壤土)에 비하여 높아진다. 20. 신개간지(新開墾地)와 같이 척박한 토양(壤土)에서도 충분량(充分量)의 가리(加里)를 시용(施用)했을 때는 숙전(熟田)과 대등(對等)한 수량(收量)을 올릴 수 있다.
Just before the Korean War, the total number of the North Korean troops was 198,380, while that of the ROK(Republic of Korea) army troops 105,752. That is, the total number of the ROK army troops at that time was 53.3% of the total number of the North Korean army. As of December 2008, the total number of the North Korean troops is estimated to be 1,190,000, while that of the ROK troops is 655,000, so the ROK army maintains 55.04% of the total number of the North Korean troops. If the ROK army continues to reduce its troops according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the total number of its troops will be 517,000 m 2020. If North Korea maintains the current status(l,190,000 troops), the number of the ROK troops will be 43.4% of the North Korean army. In terms of units, just before the Korean War, the number of the ROK army divisions and regiments was 80% and 44.8% of North Korean army. As of December 2008, North Korea maintains 86 divisions and 69 regiments. Compared to the North Korean army, the ROK army maintains 46 Divisions (53.4% of North Korean army) and 15 regiments (21.3% of North Korean army). If the ROK army continue to reduce the military units according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of ROK army divisions will be 28(13 Active Division, 4 Mobilization Divisions and 11 Local Reserve Divisions), while that of the North Korean army will be 86 in 2020. In that case, the number of divisions of the ROK army will be 32.5% of North Korean army. During the Korean war, North Korea suddenly invaded the Republic of Korea and occupied its capital 3 days after the war began. At that time, the ROK army maintained 80% of army divisions, compared to the North Korean army. The lesson to be learned from this is that, if the ROK army is forced to disperse its divisions because of the simultaneous invasion of North Korea and attack of guerrillas in home front areas, the Republic of Korea can be in a serious military danger, even though it maintains 80% of military divisions of North Korea. If the ROK army promotes the plans in [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of military units of the ROK army will be 32.5% of that of the North Korean army. This ratio is 2.4 times lower than that of the time when the Korean war began, and in this case, 90% of total military power should be placed in the DMZ area. If 90% of military power is placed in the DMZ area, few troops will be left for the defense of home front. In addition, if the ROK army continues to reduce the troops, it can allow North Korea to have asymmetrical superiority in military force and it will eventually exert negative influence on the stability and peace of the Korean peninsular. On the other hand, it should be reminded that, during the Korean War, the Republic of Korea was attacked by North Korea, though it kept 53.3% of troops, compared to North Korea. It should also be reminded that, as of 2008, the ROK army is defending its territory with the troops 55.04% of North Korea. Moreover, the national defense is assisted by 25,120 troops of the US Forces in Korea. In case the total number of the ROK troops falls below 43.4% of the North Korean army, it may cause social unrest about the national security and may lead North Korea's misjudgement. Besides, according to Lanchester strategy, the party with weaker military power (60% compared to the party with stronger military power) has the 4.1% of winning possibility. Therefore, if we consider the fact that the total number of the ROK army troops is 55.04% of that of the North Korean army, the winning possibility of the ROK army is not higher than 4.1%. If the total number of ROK troops is reduced to 43.4% of that of North Korea, the winning possibility will be lower and the military operations will be in critically difficult situation. [Military Reform Plan 2020] rums at the reduction of troops and units of the ground forces under the policy of 'select few'. However, the problem is that the financial support to achieve this goal is not secured. Therefore, the promotion of [Military Reform Plan 2020] may cause the weakening of military defence power in 2020. Some advanced countries such as Japan, UK, Germany, and France have promoted the policy of 'select few'. However, what is to be noted is that the national security situation of those countries is much different from that of Korea. With the collapse of the Soviet Unions and European communist countries, the military threat of those European advanced countries has almost disappeared. In addition, the threats those advanced countries are facing are not wars in national level, but terrorism in international level. To cope with the threats like terrorism, large scaled army trops would not be necessary. So those advanced European countries can promote the policy of 'select few'. In line with this, those European countries put their focuses on the development of military sections that deal with non-military operations and protection from unspecified enemies. That is, those countries are promoting the policy of 'select few', because they found that the policy is suitable for their national security environment. Moreover, since they are pursuing common interest under the European Union(EU) and they can form an allied force under NATO, it is natural that they are pursing the 'select few' policy. At present, NATO maintains the larger number of troops(2,446,000) than Russia(l,027,000) to prepare for the potential threat of Russia. The situation of japan is also much different from that of Korea. As a country composed of islands, its prime military focus is put on the maritime defense. Accordingly, the development of ground force is given secondary focus. The japanese government promotes the policy to develop technology-concentrated small size navy and air-forces, instead of maintaining large-scaled ground force. In addition, because of the 'Peace Constitution' that was enacted just after the end of World War II, japan cannot maintain troops more than 240,000. With the limited number of troops (240,000), japan has no choice but to promote the policy of 'select few'. However, the situation of Korea is much different from the situations of those countries. The Republic of Korea is facing the threat of the North Korean Army that aims at keeping a large-scale military force. In addition, the countries surrounding Korea are also super powers containing strong military forces. Therefore, to cope with the actual threat of present and unspecified threat of future, the importance of maintaining a carefully calculated large-scale military force cannot be denied. Furthermore, when considering the fact that Korea is in a peninsular, the Republic of Korea must take it into consideration the tradition of continental countries' to maintain large-scale military powers. Since the Korean War, the ROK army has developed the technology-force combined military system, maintaining proper number of troops and units and pursuing 'select few' policy at the same time. This has been promoted with the consideration of military situation in the Koran peninsular and the cooperation of ROK-US combined forces. This kind of unique military system that cannot be found in other countries can be said to be an insightful one for the preparation for the actual threat of North Korea and the conflicts between continental countries and maritime countries. In addition, this kind of technology-force combined military system has enabled us to keep peace in Korea. Therefore, it would be desirable to maintain this technology-force combined military system until the reunification of the Korean peninsular. Furthermore, it is to be pointed out that blindly following the 'select few' policy of advanced countries is not a good option, because it is ignoring the military strategic situation of the Korean peninsular. If the Republic of Korea pursues the reduction of troops and units radically without consideration of the threat of North Korea and surrounding countries, it could be a significant strategic mistake. In addition, the ROK army should keep an eye on the fact the European advanced countries and Japan that are not facing direct military threats are spending more defense expenditures than Korea. If the ROK army reduces military power without proper alternatives, it would exert a negative effect on the stable economic development of Korea and peaceful reunification of the Korean peninsular. Therefore, the desirable option would be to focus on the development of quality of forces, maintaining proper size and number of troops and units under the technology-force combined military system. The tableau above shows that the advanced countries like the UK, Germany, Italy, and Austria spend more defense expenditure per person than the Republic of Korea, although they do not face actual military threats, and that they keep achieving better economic progress than the countries that spend less defense expenditure. Therefore, it would be necessary to adopt the merits of the defense systems of those advanced countries. As we have examined, it would be desirable to maintain the current size and number of troops and units, to promote 'select few' policy with increased defense expenditure, and to strengthen the technology-force combined military system. On the basis of firm national security, the Republic of Korea can develop efficient policies for reunification and prosperity, and jump into the status of advanced countries. Therefore, the plans to reduce troops and units in [Military Reform Plan 2020] should be reexamined. If it is difficult for the ROK army to maintain its size of 655,000 troops because of low birth rate, the plans to establish the prompt mobilization force or to adopt drafting system should be considered for the maintenance of proper number of troops and units. From now on, the Republic of Korean government should develop plans to keep peace as well as to prepare unexpected changes in the Korean peninsular. For the achievement of these missions, some options can be considered. The first one is to maintain the same size of military troops and units as North Korea. The second one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea in terms of military force index. The third one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea, with the combination of the prompt mobilization force and the troops in active service under the system of technology-force combined military system. At present, it would be not possible for the ROK army to maintain such a large-size military force as North Korea (1,190,000 troops and 86 units). So it would be rational to maintain almost the same level of military force as North Korea with the combination of the troops on the active list and the prompt mobilization forces. In other words, with the combination of the troops in active service (60%) and the prompt mobilization force (40%), the ROK army should develop the strategies to harmonize technology and forces. The Korean government should also be prepared for the strategic flexibility of USFK, the possibility of American policy change about the location of foreign army, radical unexpected changes in North Korea, the emergence of potential threat, surrounding countries' demand for Korean force for the maintenance of regional stability, and demand for international cooperation against terrorism. For this, it is necessary to develop new approaches toward the proper number and size of troops and units. For instance, to prepare for radical unexpected political or military changes in North Korea, the Republic of Korea should have plans to protect a large number of refugees, to control arms and people, to maintain social security, and to keep orders in North Korea. From the experiences of other countries, it is estimated that 115,000 to 230,000 troops, plus ten thousands of police are required to stabilize the North Korean society, in the case radical unexpected military or political change happens in North Korea. In addition, if the Republic of Korea should perform the release of hostages, control of mass destruction weapons, and suppress the internal wars in North Korea, it should send 460,000 troops to North Korea. Moreover, if the Republic of Korea wants to stop the attack of North Korea and flow of refugees in DMZ area, at least 600,000 troops would be required. In sum, even if the ROK army maintains 600,000 troops, it may need additional 460,000 troops to prepare for unexpected radical changes in North Korea. For this, it is necessary to establish the prompt mobilization force whose size and number are almost the same as the troops in active service. In case the ROK army keeps 650,000 troops, the proper number of the prompt mobilization force would be 460,000 to 500,000.