• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 1990년도 춘계공동학술대회논문집; 한국과학기술원; 28 Apr. 1990
• /
• pp.335-343
• /
• 1990

The traditional economic evaluation methods do not seem to consider derivative efforts-productivity improvement, quality improvement.-which may be occured by AMS introduction. Current evaluation methods are based on mass production with known characteristic and stable technology. Recently, expert suggest that these assumption-stable production and mass production-are realized to be a limited in substantial economic evaluation analysis. Therefore, the problem of traditional evaluation methods suggested in this thesis and decision in the case studies are derived using two complementary economic analysis methods-AHP method, modified economic evaluation model- and traditional evaluation method. After three methods are compared and evaluated in the view of practical economic evaluation, AHP method is intended to be introduced as a new economic evaluation method.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2001년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.261-266
• /
• 2001

개발의 시각이 보존으로 바뀌면서 리모델링의 개념이 도래하였다. 경험이 부족한 국내 리모델링사업에서 경제성 검토단계는 사업주체에게 있어서 정확한 분석이 필요한 분야라 할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구는 리모델링 사업수행 시 경제성검토 단계에서 리모델링 전과 후의 가치를 비교할 수 있는 방법들을 다양한 시각으로 고찰하여 건물의 실제가치를 평가할 수 있는 방안제시를 목적으로 수행하였다. 이를 위해 기존의 건축분야와 부동산분야의 경제성 평가기법들을 조사하고 그 문제점 및 장·단점을 분석하였다. 이를 바탕으로 건축분야에서 사용되고 있는 기존의 경제성 평가기법에 부동산분야의 감정평가기법을 응용한 혼합형 평가 기법을 구축하여 그 절차와 방법을 제시하고, 실제 사례에 적용하여 타당성을 검토하였다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.49-56
• /
• 2002

Recently, building remodeling has been of more importance than ever, and it has become necessary to consider the economic efficiency in building remodeling. This study is intended to investigate the various aspects of remodeling and their comparative importance, based on the responses by building owners and remodeling constructors, and eventually the development of evaluation method of economic efficiency in building remodeling. The survey of office building constructors and building owners shows that. the need of remodeling is commonly stressed but their concerns differ. The proposed evaluation method may be useful to resolve the difference of economic concerns between demand and supply parts of remodeling, and give practical and reasonable guidelines to them.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2009년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.3-7
• /
• 2009

Construction projects are being the skyscraper and the large size by limited site condition and developing construction technology. Therefore, Steel structure work is steadily increasing caused by easy to work and structural safety. However, steel-frame work has the large incidence of heavy accident potentially. Recently a research group has recently developed newly designed self-supported steel joint for enhancing safety of steel erection work. Before applying the steel joint in a construction site, economic evaluation should be performed. Thus, we proposed the method for measuring economic efficiency of the new steel joint and verified economic feasibility of the steel joint method through a case study. As a result, Steel erection method using by self-supported steel joint showed economic rather than the one using by H-beams.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.122-128
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this paper is to propose an appropriate evaluation scheme for improvement activities, based on a simple model comprising cash inflow by sales as well as variable and fixed cost expenditures. The paper distinguishes capacity surplus and capacity shortage situations, and examines economic benefits gained by yield increase improvement and capacity increase. The paper then proposes a basic rule of thumb for economic evaluation of improvement activities. The logic is simple but useful in practice, being conducive towards improvement activities under current economic conditions with uncertainties.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2005년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1276-1280
• /
• 2005

The Maglav system project affects communities and are usually funded by public agencies. Evaluation of this project that considerably impact whole communities requires public involvement. This specific requirement of transportation projects determines the method of their evaluation as the impacts are estimated from the transportation economic point of view. Especially evaluation criteria must reflect the needs of the interested parties and should consider all foreseeable benefits and losses caused by the Maglav project. To select evaluation criteria and evaluation method may help a decision--maker in making a best selection for a Maglav project.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.741-747
• /
• 2003

There are many method to evaluate the economic value and non-economic value for information service. But we have a difficult problem to estimate the economic value of information objectively because we don't have a comparable value correspondent to the value of information service. Here, we proposed a method to evaluate for the value of information with the survey and discussed the model of the measure of non-economic value with weighted wages.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.187-200
• /
• 2020

Despite the eco-friendly route plan, road slopes were collapsed due to road construction, resulting in human and property damage. To solve this problem, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs established guidelines in 2009 to conduct a test-bed for slope recording considering the conditions of the site and the ecological environment, and divided them into recording quality and economic evaluation. The following results were obtained by analyzing 183 construction methods of cut-soil sections at 60 sites from 2012 to 2018 for road slope afforestation research. Straw net+seedspray, vegetation media spray method 1T, 3T were used the most, and vegetation media spray method 3T(patent) was excellent in quality, and straw net+seedspray was excellent in economics. As a result of analyzing the market unit price and the construction unit price, vegetation media spray method submitted the construction unit price at up to 60% lower than the market unit price. As a result of the analysis of the key factors of the greening method evaluation, the economic assessment had the greatest influence on all evaluation items. Problems in the evaluation method of revegetation were first identified as problems in the allocation of points and secondly as problems in the evaluation criteria. As for the improvement of the economic assessment criteria, the method was proposed to evaluate the same method based on market unit price when the same method was constructed, and not to conduct an economic assessment if there was a difference in market unit price between methods, or to add weight to the scores. Based on the monitoring data of 60 road slopes, this study drew up problems and improvement measures. However, with regard to scoring, research on appropriate scoring is needed by examining the current status.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.37-51
• /
• 1993

The Objects of this study are: 1. To compare the housework time of housewives by region and employment status. 2. To compare the economic value of housework by region and employment status. 3. To evaluate the economic value of housework by each method. The subjects of this study were 815 housewives living in Taegu and Kyungsangpookdo. The statistics used for data analysis were frequency, percentile, T-test, ANOVA and Seheffe test by SPSS PC programs: 1) The average housework time was 7.8hours per day. Full-time housewives spent 8.2hours and employed housewives spent 6.7hours to housework. 2) Partially there were significant difference in economic value of housework by employment status. 3) Estimates of economic value of housework by each method of evaluation are : (unit : won) sample mean method monthly (1) Specialized substitute method 587,080 (2) Overall substitute method 760,640 (3) Opportunity cost method 556,060 (4) Reservation wage method 534,070 (5) Subjective evalution method 644,540

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.37-44
• /
• 2017

This research is devoted to the development of methods general and standard methodological approaches and approbation those for the evaluation of economic potential and level of concentration of the regions of Kazakhstan. This paper presents the results of development of the authors on the selection and justification of the methodological approaches for quantitative evaluation of the economic potential (the degree of territorial differentiation of the profile) and concentration of regions. In this study, we used scientific methods: method of analysis the main trends of economic development, and method of evaluation of concentration of the region. Based on the analysis of foreign techniques developed and tested methodical approaches to the assessment of the economic potential (index and coefficient methods). Proposed methodological approaches to the assessment profile of the territory and developed a system of indicators, which includes an aggregated index of spatial concentration, which accurately reflects the concentration of production in the region. This study shows the results of the analysis of the potential regional disparities and trends of economic development of Kazakhstan. By using, the proposed methodology shows the possibility of their use; we calculated the indicators of integrated assessment of the economic potential and indicators of spatial concentration.