• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2016

고속도로 망의 지속적인 확장과 교통량 증대로 인해 고속도로에 인접하여 서식하는 야생동물의 생활권은 축소되거나 단절된다. 이는 먹이를 찾거나 번식지로 이동하는 야생동물들의 교통사고 가능성을 높인다. 야생동물 교통사고는 운전자의 안전 및 도로 시설의 위험 요소일 뿐만 아니라 야생동물 자체의 생명에도 위협이 된다. 야생동물의 서식지 분절을 막기 위한 다양한 방법 중 생태통로와 야생동물 유도 울타리가 대표적이다. 이러한 야생동물 교통사고 예방사업의 시설 설치비용은 명확하게 측정되지만, 편익의 경제적 가치를 측정하기는 어렵다. 본 연구에서는 조건부가치측정법을 사용하여 고속도로 상의 야생동물 교통사고 예방사업의 경제적 가치를 추정하였다. 추정결과에 따르면, 우리나라 전체 가구의 약 43.88%가 이 사업에 대한 양(+)의 지불의사를 가진 것으로 나타났다. 이와 더불어 환경문제의 인식이나 동 사업에 대한 사전 인지 정도가 높을수록 지불의사 확률과 지불의사액이 높아지는 것이 확인되었다. 따라서 해당 사업에 대한 적극적인 홍보는 야생동물 교통사고 예방사업에 긍정적인 여론을 형성하고, 동 사업에 양(+)의 금액을 지불할 의사가 있는 가구를 늘리는 데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 보인다.

• 교육시설 논문지
• /
• 제25권5호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to examine the degree of appropriateness of using design quality indicators for the educational building, and complements for design quality indicators. For doing this, each items of the Korean educational building design indicator was validated by teachers, school staff and an education officer. First, School Personnel and Teachers considered indicators for the classroom designed for general subjects as being valid. However, in terms of indicators for the outside space, they thought of them as not being valid. In particular, it seemed that school staff would have a passive attitude toward the open of the school facility for the local society. It is judged that there happens an adverse effect caused by the open of the school facility for the local society in the educational environment of the school. Second, Education Office Supervisors thought that eco-friendly indicators, LED lighting, an outer wall, and widows and doors had a high validity. On the contrary, he viewed the validity of a rainwater retention basin as being low, which was likely because he rarely had expertise on the construction. When it comes to the indicator of technology capability, ultrahigh-speed information network was seen as being valid, and the indicator of economic feasibility had high validity on maintenance and durability. Third, compared to groups of Teachers and School Personnel, the group of education officers presented high validity of indicators. Validity of indicators might be differently showed because different items on indicators were measured. However, it is speculated that Education Office Supervisors mostly acknowledged the validity of indicators. Fourth, a majority of Teachers, School staff, and Education Office Supervisors were favor of the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities since it played a guide role in improving the quality of school. In order to settle the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities, it is most important that institutions in the local society which are publicly reliable should participate in the phase of designing the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities. In sum, overall respondents agreed with the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities but were aware that reliable organizations in public would need to take part in planning the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities from the beginning.