• 21st centry Political Science Review
• /
• v.28 no.4
• /
• pp.105-124
• /
• 2018

In March 2017, the British Parliament voted in favor of the British government in response to a 51.9% approval for the EU withdrawal (Brexit) of about 72% of total voters in the referendum held in the UK in June 2016 (EU Referendum) Passed a bill granting EU withdrawal notification powers. In the case of the UK, EU exports accounted for 44% of the total EU exports in 2016, and the EU exports to the UK accounted for about 8% of the total exports. The UK government was burdened with the need to coordinate differences between the 27 EU member states with different interests by country or industry. Therefore, the existing research on the UK's negotiation process of the Brexit is relatively concerned with the economic aspects. In this paper, however, we examine the EU's common foreign and security policy in addition to the economic sector, We will look through the negotiation process with the focus of foreign security policy areas.

• Analyses & Alternatives
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.79-110
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this research is to explore the relation between Brexit and division in various areas within the British society. This research can lead to understanding how division of the British society and the decision of Brexit was mutually influenced. The UK's withdrawal from the EU has been explained mainly through the relations between the EU and the UK; therefore, issues of immigration, EU regulation, and the UK's EU rebate are considered as major reasons. In addition, 'British identity' or 'British exceptionalism' existing in the British society and politics for a long time has been regarded as a reason for Brexit. Although it is generally accepted that Brexit results in the division in the British society, the reasons mentioned above have limitation to explain the result of referendum and the division of the British society in the post-Brexit era. In this sense, this research explores the division in various areas - generation, social grade including income and education level, value and region, etc. - revealed in the British society is not the result of Brexit; rather, this research argues division deeply rooted in the British society before referendum is the root cause of Brexit. The division in various areas immanent in the British society for a long time is complicatedly intertwined, and the decision on Brexit by referendum has led to solidifying the division of the British society. Having considered this division in the British society has been expanded to rancour, it is necessary for the UK to establish appropriate policies for national cohesion.

• Industry Promotion Research
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.113-115
• /
• 2017

A brief analysis of the impact of the UK off Europe paper on both the positive and negative aspects. For example, in the UK after the EU referendum, out of the shackles of the UK's European Union in the short term, away from the impact of refugees. On the contrary, however, it can have a tremendous impact on the UK's foreign trade and financial industry, while the UK's International will be influenced by the West.

• The Southeast Asian review
• /
• v.27 no.2
• /
• pp.245-271
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to examine and assess the major characteristics and changes of politics, economy, and diplomacy in Thailand in 2016. Specifically, it reviewed the New Constitution that was passed in 2016, the confrontation between different political forces and the trend of military regime around the New Constitution, and the political instability caused by the accession of the new king to the throne. This study also set out to figure out changes to the economy and foreign relations of the country, including its relations with South Korea, under the military regime and make predictions for the impact and future prospects of King Bhumibol Adulyadej's death on the politics and economy of the country. In 2016, the politics of Thailand took a step further toward the transfer of power to civil government and established a foundation for an authoritarian system. The draft of the New Constitution, which does not seem to be democratic, was approved by a referendum and enabled the military authorities to continue their political interventions, even after the general election. The New Constitution, in particular, reduces the power of political parties itself in addition to simply keeping the Thaksin's party in check; thus, anticipating ongoing conflicts between the military authorities and political parties. In this situation, the absence of King Bhumibol Adulyadej, who used to play a decisive role in promoting the political stability of the country, and the accession of the new king to the throne raise concerns about the acceleration of political instability, which has continued after the coup and influenced the diplomatic relations of the country. Today, Thailand is distancing itself from Western nations that do not recognize the current military regime including the U.S.A. and EU member states and instead maintains a rapidly friendly and close relation with China. In 2016, the economy of Thailand made a gradual recovery rather than high growth. The death of King Bhumibol Adulyadej has exerted limited direct economic impacts only on individual consumption and tourism and is not likely to cause a recession. An economic crisis will, however, be unavoidable if the political confrontations escalate before the general election to transfer power to the civil government.